朱子와 胡宏의 工夫論

Abstract

This Treatise grounds on the Hu Hong's problems of raising the feature and the difference on the Zhu Xi's and Hu Hong's Theory of study in chihyani-i. Here, I will solve the origin of the problem of the Hu Hong's theory of study and the beginning of the solution of the Zhu Xi's theory. The origin of this problem can be brought by two kind of theories, which Zhu xi study, namely zhonghejiushuo and zhonghexinshuo. Zhonghejiushuo is the theory that Zhu xi establishes as HuNanXue. But, as soon as the problem of jiushuo is revealed in Zhonghejiushuo, Zhu xi establishes Zhonghexinshuo by separating from Zhonghejiushuo. The alteration of Zhu xi's theory of study becomes the starting point that Zhu xi has strongly doubt about the Hu Hong's theory of study. But, thinking about Zhonghejiushuo that Zhu xi establishes at the outset, Zhu xi already has preserved the key that solve this problem. The xin, xing and qing that Zhu xi presents in zhonghexinshuo is determined by the activity of the intentionality, qing, or perception as xing of xin which grounds on the ZhangZai's xintongxingqingshuo. This Zhu xi's argument is presupposed by the intension that xing and qing are supervised by xin. But Hu Hong suggests that xin is not supervised by xing, but that, from the activity of the perception of xin itself, only the lasting practise is an important point. From this objection, Zhu xi and Hu hong differ from their own theory of study. Namely, from the argument of xintongxingqingshuo, Zhu xi suggests that the study of the cultivation of the pre-intentional state and of the self-reflection about the already-intentional state is supervissed by xin, the other side, Hu hong limits the self-reflection and the cultivation in the study of the already-intentional state. Thus the key-point of the question and the objection about Hu hong's theory of study is confirmed by the Zhu xi's chihyani-i.