특허권의 정당성에 관한 이론의 전개와 전망
Patent Theories of Justification and its Current Development
0
조회
0
다운로드
28
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Justification of patent has long been debated by scholars. The debates would be divided into two class at large. One is based on the natural rights. The other is based on the Utilitarian aspect. The first possession, Lockean and Hegelian theories are categorized as the natural law justification, whereas economic based reward theory, contract theory, law and economics, prospect theory, patent-induced theories, rent-dissipation theory, race-to-invent theory are utilitarian and economic based theories. Historically, the debates had been focused on the justification of monopoly on the intangible property. In recent, however, the debates have been changed the justification to the proper patent institution under civil society. Thus, we might understand the reason that the non-obviousness requirement for the acquiring patent came on a hop-pot. The natural rights perspective is still alive. Whenever the new paradigm of intellectual properties such as data base, business model, comes, we call the natural rights justification for the protection of those matters. In the western jurisprudence of intellectual property law, the justification of monopoly on the intangible property begins as the first step to scholastic approach. The western jurisprudence has a strong point to this work.
Abstract
The Justification of patent has long been debated by scholars. The debates would be divided into two class at large. One is based on the natural rights. The other is based on the Utilitarian aspect. The first possession, Lockean and Hegelian theories are categorized as the natural law justification, whereas economic based reward theory, contract theory, law and economics, prospect theory, patent-induced theories, rent-dissipation theory, race-to-invent theory are utilitarian and economic based theories. Historically, the debates had been focused on the justification of monopoly on the intangible property. In recent, however, the debates have been changed the justification to the proper patent institution under civil society. Thus, we might understand the reason that the non-obviousness requirement for the acquiring patent came on a hop-pot. The natural rights perspective is still alive. Whenever the new paradigm of intellectual properties such as data base, business model, comes, we call the natural rights justification for the protection of those matters. In the western jurisprudence of intellectual property law, the justification of monopoly on the intangible property begins as the first step to scholastic approach. The western jurisprudence has a strong point to this work.
참고문헌 (48)
- 한지영, "지적재산의 철학에 관한 연구-로크의 노동이론을 중심으로-", 산업재산권, (20), pp.1~28 (2006), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 한지영, "헤겔의 법철학과 지적재산", 산업재산권, (23), pp.649~674 (2007), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 나종갑, "특허의 본질에 관한 연구", 산업재산권, (17), pp.31~72 (2005), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 나종갑, "周波數資源의 法的本質 및 周波數政策에 대한 意味 - 比較法的 檢討 -", 저스티스, (91), pp.26~62 (2006), 한국법학원
- 신동룡, "特許法理論에 對한 硏究", 중앙법학, 8(4), pp.391~426 (2006), 중앙법학회
- Alfred C. Yen, "Restoring the Natural Law: Copyright as Labor and Possession", Ohio St. L. J., 517 (1990)
- A. Samuel Oddi, "An Uneasier Case for Copyright Than for Patent Protection of Computer. Programs", Neb. L. Rev., 351 (1993)
- A. Samuel Oddi, "Beyond Obviousness: Invention Protection in the Twenty-First Century", Am. U. L. Rev., (1097) (1989)
- A. Samuel Oddi, "Trips--Natural Rights and a Polite form of Economic Imperialism", Vand. J. Transnat'l L., (415) (1996)
- A. Samuel Oddi, "Un-unified Economic Theories of Patents-- the Not-Quite-Holy Grail", Notre Dame L. Rev., 267 (1996)
- Amnon Lehavi, "The Property Puzzle", GEO. L.J., 1987 (2008)
- Andrew Blair-Stanek, "Profits as Commercial Success", Yale L.J., 642 (2008)
- David B. Conrad, "Mining the Patent Thicket: the Supreme Court's Rejection of the Automatic Injunction Rule in Ebay v. Mercexchange", Rev. Litig., 119 (2007)
- Donald G. Mcfetridge, "Patents, Prospects, and Economic Surplus: A Comment", J. L & Eco., 197 (1980)
- Donald L. Martin, "Reducing Anticipated Rewards from Innovation Through Patents: Or Less is More", Va. L. Rev., 351 (1992)
- Edmund W. Kitch, "The Nature and Function of the Patent System", J. L. & Eco., 256 (1977)
- Edwin C. Hettinger, "Justifying Intellectual Property", Phil & Pub. Aff., 31 (1989)
- Garett Hardin, "The Tragedy of the Commons", Science, 1243 (1968)
- Harold Demsetz, "Toward a Theory of Property Rights", Am. Econ. Rev., (347) (1967)
- J.P. Day, "Locke on Property", Philosophical Quarterly, 207 (1966)
- John F. Duffy, "Rethinking the Prospect Theory of Patents", U. Chi. L.R., 439 (2004)
- John T Cross, "Justifying Property Rights In Native American Traditional Knowledge", Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev., 257 (2009)
- Justin Hughes, "The Philosophy of Intellectual Property", Geo. L.J., 287 (1988)
- Lawrence C. Becker, "Deserving to Own Intellectual Property", Chi.-Kent L. Rev., 609 (1993)
- Margaret Jane Radin, "Property and Personhood", Stan. L. Rev., 957 (1982)
- Mark F. Grady, "Patent Law and Rent Dissipation", Va. L. Rev., 305 (1992)
- Michael A. Heller, "The Tragedy of the Anticommons", Harv. L. Rev., 621 (1998)
- Morris R. Cohen, "Property and Sovereignty", Cornell L. Q., 8 (1927)
- Nari Lee, "Toward A Pluralistic Theory on an Efficacious Patent Institution", J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L., 220 (2007)
- Rebecca S. Eisenberg, "Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use", U. Chi. L. Rev., 1017 (1989)
- Richard A. Epstein, "Possession as the Root of Title", Ga. L. Rev., 1221 (1979)
- Robert P. Merges, "On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope", Colum. L. Rev., 839 (1990)
- Steven Shavell, "Rewards Versus Intellectual Property Rights", J.L. & Econ., 525 (2001)
- Wendy J. Gordon, "A Property Right in Self-Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property", Yale L. J., 1533 (1993)
- F.M. Scherer, "Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance" (1980)
- "Hegel's Philosophy of Right", translated with notes by T. M. Knox, 1967
- Jeremy Waldron, "The Right to Private Property", ~ (1990)
- John Locke, "Second Treatise of Government" (1988)
- Lawrence C. Becker, "Property Rights Philosophic Foundations", ~ (1977)
- Margaret Jane Radin, "Reinterpreting Property", ~ (1993)
- Melville B. Nimmer, "Nimmer on Copyright", ~ (1990)
- Richard A. Posner, "Economic Analysis of Law", ~ (1992)
- Richard A. Posner, "Economics of Justice", ~ (1981)
- Robert Nozick, "Anarchy, State, and Utopia", ~ (1974)
- Stephen R. Munzer, "A Theory of Property", ~ (1990)
- Ward S. Bowman, Jr., "Patent and Antitrust Law: A Legal and Economic Appraisal", ~ (1973)
- William B. Stoebuck, "The Law of Property", ~ (2000)
- "Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Isaac McPherson"[URL]