본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

변론주의 보완책으로서 석명권 - 민사소송법 제103조 제1항, 제4항 법적 성질과 관련하여 -

Eclaircissement Authority as Complementary Measures about the Principle of Pleading - A Study on the Nature of Legal on the Article 103 ⑴, ⑷ of the Civil Proceedings Act -

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

For engaging the legal relations between privates, the process of Right actualizing procedure must be fair. That is, a fair judgement would be made within the guarantee of self-pleading chances and speaking one's assertions in the process of pleading, interpretation and application of law founded on the justifiable principal of law. This pleading process institutes the rational suit with taking a one's assertion and collecting the corroborative facts which is based on the one's egoistic mind But in the present court, there are lots of cases which make a alternative conclusion on the trial due to the lack of legal knowledge or false examination. It makes people distrust the court and damage the people's belief about the legal emotion. Therefore the Civil Proceeding Acts 136 text 1 which is to make the lawsuit relation clear asks the legal and actual facts in the suit process, and text 4 confirms that give a chance to a person who have surly missed his speaking chances or connived over the legal facts at the court. But there are a lot of theories and disputes for this text on the interpretation and application. This paper is to find a way to conquest this shortcomings of principals of oral proceeding and, as a complement, the principal of explication for the fair suit. On the bases of this principals I will discuss about the CPA 136 text 1 and 4's legal natures. Also I'll discriminate whether we admit positive pleading duty relate to the range of the oral pleading, as a core of this dispute or not. At last, I'll analyse the legislation process of indication duty at the newly revised CPA in 1990, and the Deutch's debates over this principals. In the process of the suit, for understandng the ideology of the once settlement in dispute and concentrated inquiry, I'll analyse the pattern of indication and the interpretation of text on the legal point of view. And I'll catch the leading cases which the court positively leads the one's opinion expression at the beginning of the oral proceeding. In conclusion, this paper is to make up for the weak point of the principal of pleading rights, and to make clear the lawsuit relation with the purpose of this text, to study its legal character and the essential issue of the pleading right and indication duty approved to the rational lawsuit.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2009), 박영사
  2. 칼 라렌츠, "정당한 법의 원리" (1995), 박영사
  3. 전병서, "민사소송법강의" (2003), 법문사
  4. 호문혁, "민사소송법" (2006), 법문사
  5. 법무부, "민사소송법 개정위원회 회의록 제1권", ~ (1989)
  6. 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 민사소송Ⅱ" (2005), 법원행정처
  7. 정동윤, "민사소송법" (2005), 법문사
  8. 한국민사소송법학회, "민사소송" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
  9. 김상원, "석명권의 행사와 그 기능", 법조 (1979)
  10. 양병회, "석명권의 범위", 고시연구 (1997)
  11. 김홍규, "석명권의 성질·범위와 석명불응 및 석명권남용의 소송법상 효력", 고시연구 (1983)
  12. 호문혁, "민사소송에 있어서의 법률적 사항에 관한 법관의 시사의무", 고시연구 (1996)
  13. 홍기문, "주요사실과 간접사실의 구별", 고시연구 (1991)
  14. 오용호, "법원의 석명권과 민사소송을 지배하는 원칙과의 관계, in: 민사판례연구" (1983)
  15. 홍기문, "독일 민사소송법상 지적의무", 전남대학교 법학논총 (1997), 전남대학교 법률행정연구소
  16. 최은희, "석명권에 관한 연구", 법조 (1997)
  17. Baumgärtel, "Einführung in das Zivilprozeϐecht, 9. Aufl.", ~ (2001)
  18. Baur, "Zivilprozeϐrecht, 10. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
  19. Bruns, "Zivilprozeϐrecht, 3. Aufl.", ~ (1987)
  20. Jauernig, "Zivilprozeϐrecht, 27. Aufl.", ~ (2002)
  21. Musielak, "Grundkurs ZPO, 6. Aufl.", ~ (2002)
  22. Paulus, "Zivilprozeϐrecht, 2. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
  23. Peters, E., "Zivilprozeϐrecht, 5. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
  24. Schilken, "Zivilprozeϐrecht, 3. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
  25. Stein, "ZPO" (1990), C. B. Beck

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)