민사소송의 목적을 통해 살펴 본 민사재판의 현대적 의미
Civil Trials and Their Modern Implications in Light of the Objectives of Civil Procedure
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In terms of functions, the meaning of trials in a modern society has changed from a strike to claim rights to a process for delivering results in accordance with legal procedures. This has led us to seek alternative ways of resolving legal matters and alternative dispute resolution organizations. The objectives of civil procedure should be understood from multiple perspectives including protection of rights, contribution to dispute resolution, procedural due process in practice and embodiment of laws etc.. If they are understood in such a way, the right to a trial should have a broad definition. In other words, the right to a trial should include rights to all private civil actions related to a civil dispute. Since the objectives of a civil trial are ultimately related to the judge’s decision, it is required that a new approach to the functions and implications of the civil trial be introduced. Theoretical discussions on the modern implications of civil trials have focused on justification for the trials. The justification should be found on the ground whether the parties to the case had given equal opportunities in arguing against each other and providing evidences, not whether the judge had been given full authority to determine the case and deliver the final decision.
Abstract
In terms of functions, the meaning of trials in a modern society has changed from a strike to claim rights to a process for delivering results in accordance with legal procedures. This has led us to seek alternative ways of resolving legal matters and alternative dispute resolution organizations. The objectives of civil procedure should be understood from multiple perspectives including protection of rights, contribution to dispute resolution, procedural due process in practice and embodiment of laws etc.. If they are understood in such a way, the right to a trial should have a broad definition. In other words, the right to a trial should include rights to all private civil actions related to a civil dispute. Since the objectives of a civil trial are ultimately related to the judge’s decision, it is required that a new approach to the functions and implications of the civil trial be introduced. Theoretical discussions on the modern implications of civil trials have focused on justification for the trials. The justification should be found on the ground whether the parties to the case had given equal opportunities in arguing against each other and providing evidences, not whether the judge had been given full authority to determine the case and deliver the final decision.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 김건호, "기판력의 물적 범위에 관한 소고: 소송물이론을 중심으로", 법조, 56(9), pp.132~169 (2007), 법조협회
- 김용진, "소송상 쟁점사항과 소송물이론", 법학연구, 12(1) (2001), 충남대법학연구소
- 김용진, "민사소송법" (2008), 신영사
- 홍기문, "민사소송법" (2005), 대명출판사
- 김홍규, "민사소송법" (2011), 삼영사
- 류승훈, "법관의 법적 결정이 갖는 의미와 그 정당성 확보 문제 - 현대 법이론의 관점에서 살펴 본 판결의 정당성 논의 -", 외법논집, 33(1), pp.285~310 (2009), 법학연구소
- 류승훈, "로스쿨 신민사소송법" (2010), 한국학술정보
- 박준석, "The Concept of Authority" (2007), 경인문화사
- 박태신, "민사소송의 목적은 무엇인가", 변호사 제31집 (2001), 대한변호사협회
- 송상현, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 송상현, "민사소송법" (2011), 박영사
- 박은정, "법철학의 문제들" (2007), 博英社
- 오세혁, "법철학사" (2005), 세창출판사
- 오세혁, "법철학의 관점에서 본 민사소송법 -민사소송의 목적과 관련하여-", 법철학연구, 8(1), pp.85~112 (2005), 한국법철학회
- 이상돈, "법이론" (1997), 박영사
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2011), 박영사
- 장석조, "헌법과 민사소송법", 민사소송, 9(1), pp.40~85 (2005), 한국민사소송법학회
- 전병서, (2003), 법문사
- 호문혁, "민사소송법 제9판" (2011), 법문사
- 호문혁, "민사소송에 있어서의 이념과 변론주의에 대한 고찰", 민사소송(1) (1998), 한국민사소송법학회
- 호문혁, "민사소송법 제8판" (2010), 법문사
- 홍기문, "헌법과 민사소송", 민사소송, 9(2), pp.11~39 (2005), 한국민사소송법학회
- Robert Alexy, "법적 논증이론" (2007), 고려대학교 출판부
- Walter. J. Habscheid, "민사소송에 있어서의 소송물이론의 발전", 법학, 31(1ㆍ2) (1990), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- Christoph Althammer, "Die Streitgegenstandslehre von Karl Heinz Schwab im Zivilprozess des 21. Jahrhunderts" (2010), ZZP 123
- Fasching, "Lehrbuch des oesterreichischen Zivilprozessrechts" (1990), 2. Aufl., Wien
- Lueke, "Muenchener Kommentar ZPO" (2002), C.H.Bcck
- Otmar Jauernig, "Zivilprozessrecht" (2002), 27. Aufl., C.H.Bcck
- "Rosenberg", Schwab, pp.2010, ~
- "Stein", Jonas, pp.2004, ~
- 다나카 시게아키, "현대법이론" (2007), 동국대학교 출판부
- 홍기문, "민사소송법" (2005), 대명출판사