본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조세법과 형평법의 조화 - 민법상 한정승인제도에 있어 조세법률주의와 실질과세원칙의 조화를 중심으로 -

Harmony of Tax Law and Equity

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to point out the issues arising from the relationship between taxing regulations and limited authorization regulation. However the specific goal is to seek a harmonious interpretation of legal tax policy and egalitarian tax policy as well as practical tax policy. This can be summarized as the issue of taxing regulation and equality regulations. Reflecting from the actual legal tax policy, egalitarian tax policy and practical tax policy, duties levied on inheritance, profit from succession and acquisition should all be categorized as 'expenses on inheritance' on civil law article 998 section 2 as 'expenses required for management and liquidation fee'. If so, above mentioned duties are 'successee payable' under civil law article 1028, therefore payment duty will be borne within the range of inheritance property acquired by the limited successor herself. This interpretation seems to be a harmonious interpretation of taxing regulation and equality regulations. However this issue will have to be resolved at a fundamental level through legislation. Which means, that in order to prevent the inconvenience of having one's rights be protected through court decision with regards to duties already levied, the legislation of following regulations will be necessary. First, to enable filing claiming for refund on duties that are paid in excess of inherited property within a certain period(3 years) from the point of inheritance, when duties are levied to the limited inheritor in forms of inheritance, profit from succession and acquisition duties.Second, by coming up with relevant regulations within basic national tax law etc. to limit the levying within the price of the inherited property by the limited inheritor through interpreting the tax duty as the payable for successee, seeing inheritance to be the cause in the case of limited inheritance authorization

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to point out the issues arising from the relationship between taxing regulations and limited authorization regulation. However the specific goal is to seek a harmonious interpretation of legal tax policy and egalitarian tax policy as well as practical tax policy. This can be summarized as the issue of taxing regulation and equality regulations. Reflecting from the actual legal tax policy, egalitarian tax policy and practical tax policy, duties levied on inheritance, profit from succession and acquisition should all be categorized as 'expenses on inheritance' on civil law article 998 section 2 as 'expenses required for management and liquidation fee'. If so, above mentioned duties are 'successee payable' under civil law article 1028, therefore payment duty will be borne within the range of inheritance property acquired by the limited successor herself. This interpretation seems to be a harmonious interpretation of taxing regulation and equality regulations. However this issue will have to be resolved at a fundamental level through legislation. Which means, that in order to prevent the inconvenience of having one's rights be protected through court decision with regards to duties already levied, the legislation of following regulations will be necessary. First, to enable filing claiming for refund on duties that are paid in excess of inherited property within a certain period(3 years) from the point of inheritance, when duties are levied to the limited inheritor in forms of inheritance, profit from succession and acquisition duties.Second, by coming up with relevant regulations within basic national tax law etc. to limit the levying within the price of the inherited property by the limited inheritor through interpreting the tax duty as the payable for successee, seeing inheritance to be the cause in the case of limited inheritance authorization

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "주석 민법, 상속법 ⑵, 2002.8", ~ (2002)
  2. 법원실무제요, (2003), 법원행정처
  3. Fukuda Moritosh, "American Law and Legal English" (2009), 박영사
  4. Sarah Aorthington, "Equity" (2009), 소화
  5. -, "법조", 2008, 284~307, pp.법조협회
  6. 김웅희, "조세법의 기본원칙에 관한 헌법적 연구", 박사, pp.2003
  7. 박재범, "위헌결정사례로 본 조세법률주의 내용과 위헌판단기준에 관한 연구", 석사, 세무학과, pp.2003
  8. 이창희, "세법의 헌법적 기초에 관한 시론", 조세법연구, 6 (2000)
  9. 이회창, "조세법률주의-그 권리보장적 기능과 관련하여, 조세사건에 관한 제문제(상)", 재판자료, 60 (1993), 법원행정처
  10. 정하중, "공법상 부당이득반환청구권의 독자성", 법률신문, ~ (2010)
  11. 최철환, "특별한정승인에 의하여 부동산을 상속받은 자에 대한 취득세 부과처분의 적법 여부", 대법원판례해설, (69) (2008), 법원도서관
  12. 허부열, "상속의 한정승인에 있어서 상속재산이 없거나 그 상속재산이 상속채무의 변제에 부족한 경우 상속채무 전부에 대한 이행판결을 선고하여야 하는지 여부", 대법원 판례해설, (46), 법원도서관

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)