본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한정승인을 할 경우 부동산에 관하여 발생할 수 있는 몇 가지 조세 문제에 관한 검토

A study on tax issues that may arise in relation to real estate in case of qualified acceptance

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

There are lots of practical and theoretical problems in case of qualified acceptance, especially in relation to real estate. For exemple, think about that question ; After the inheritee set a mortgage on real estate A and died, one of inheritors filed a report of qualified acceptance. Discretionary auction on real estate A proceeded, and successful bidder paid price at official auction. Then inheritee’s creditor received dividend from that auction. Should inheritors pay for transfer income tax of real estate A, despite qualified acceptance of one of inheritors? Jugements of lower courts and decisions of Tax Tribunal are lack of consistency and not unified. For the reason that qualified Acceptance is under the condition of repaying the obligation of inheritee, it is important to know when the transfer is in terms of transfer income tax. If there was a transfer prior to the inheritee’s death, the obligation of transfer income tax is that of inheritee. On the other hand, if there was a transfer after the inheritee’s death, the obligation of transfer income tax is that of inheritor. That is due to the text of Civil Act Article 1028. In this case, Civil Act Article 998-2 can be applied to transfer income tax. Expenses for inheritance on Civil Act Article 998-2 can include liquidation cost that is for settling the liability of transfer income tax of inheritee. There is an acquisition tax when an inheritor acquires real estate due to inheritance. However, since inheritors are already required to pay inheritance tax, there is a double taxation for inheritors to pay the acquisition tax. Inheritance tax shall be included in the expense of inheritance under Article 998-2 of Civil Act because the estate tax method is adopted and the estate tax method levies on the property of inheritee. Since the inheritance tax is the obligation of the inheritee, it is reasonable to assume that inheritors should not be liable for the qualified acceptance. A renunciation of an inheritance may be used to exempt all obligations arising from inheritance. If there is a risk of tax liability incurred despite filing a report of qualified acceptance, a renunciation of an inheritance should be considered within the statutory period.

Abstract

There are lots of practical and theoretical problems in case of qualified acceptance, especially in relation to real estate. For exemple, think about that question ; After the inheritee set a mortgage on real estate A and died, one of inheritors filed a report of qualified acceptance. Discretionary auction on real estate A proceeded, and successful bidder paid price at official auction. Then inheritee’s creditor received dividend from that auction. Should inheritors pay for transfer income tax of real estate A, despite qualified acceptance of one of inheritors? Jugements of lower courts and decisions of Tax Tribunal are lack of consistency and not unified. For the reason that qualified Acceptance is under the condition of repaying the obligation of inheritee, it is important to know when the transfer is in terms of transfer income tax. If there was a transfer prior to the inheritee’s death, the obligation of transfer income tax is that of inheritee. On the other hand, if there was a transfer after the inheritee’s death, the obligation of transfer income tax is that of inheritor. That is due to the text of Civil Act Article 1028. In this case, Civil Act Article 998-2 can be applied to transfer income tax. Expenses for inheritance on Civil Act Article 998-2 can include liquidation cost that is for settling the liability of transfer income tax of inheritee. There is an acquisition tax when an inheritor acquires real estate due to inheritance. However, since inheritors are already required to pay inheritance tax, there is a double taxation for inheritors to pay the acquisition tax. Inheritance tax shall be included in the expense of inheritance under Article 998-2 of Civil Act because the estate tax method is adopted and the estate tax method levies on the property of inheritee. Since the inheritance tax is the obligation of the inheritee, it is reasonable to assume that inheritors should not be liable for the qualified acceptance. A renunciation of an inheritance may be used to exempt all obligations arising from inheritance. If there is a risk of tax liability incurred despite filing a report of qualified acceptance, a renunciation of an inheritance should be considered within the statutory period.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 구욱서, "사법과 세법" (2010), 유로
  2. 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2020), 법문사
  3. 법무법인 율촌 조세판례연구회, "조세판례연구Ⅱ" (2009), 세경사
  4. 송덕수, "친족상속법" (2018), 박영사
  5. 안대희, "조세범처벌법" (2015), 평안
  6. 윤진수, "친족상속법 강의" (2019), 박영사
  7. 윤진수, "상속법 개정론" (2020), 박영사
  8. 이태로, "조세법강의" (2020), 박영사
  9. 임승순, "조세법" (2020), 박영사
  10. 민유숙, (2020), 한국사법행정학회
  11. 윤진수, "주해 상속법 제1권" (2019), 박영사
  12. 한국세법학회, "조세판례백선2" (2015), 박영사
  13. 김주미, "상속재산파산의 실무상 쟁점 연구- 파산재단과 자유재산, 상속비용과 재단채권, 민사소송과의 관계 등을 중심으로 -", 법조, 68(1), pp.307~355 (2019), 법조협회[DOI]
  14. 김형석, "한정승인의 효과로서 발생하는 재산분리의 의미", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.495~536 (2008), 한국가족법학회
  15. 민유숙, "2012년 민사(친족, 상속법) 중요 판례", 인권과 정의, (432), pp.50~63 (2013), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  16. 박동섭, "개정민법과 상속의 한정승인·포기", 법조, 51(4) (2002), 법조협회
  17. 송인권, "한정승인의 요건 및 효과에 관한 실무상 문제", 사법논집, 55 (2012), 법원도서관
  18. 송효진, "상속의 승인과 포기에 관한 연구", 법학논집, 14(1), pp.313~330 (2009), 법학연구소
  19. 이전오, "2012년 조세법 중요 판례", 인권과 정의, (432), pp.151~166 (2013), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  20. 최원, "세우칼럼―상속에 대한 취득세 부과는 부당하다", 한국세정신문, ~ (2002)
  21. 최철환, "특별한정승인에 의하여 부동산을 상속받은 자에 대한 취득세 부과처분의 적법여부", 대법원 판례해설, (69) (2007)
  22. 최현숙, "상속에 있어서 청산법리의 확대에 관한 소고", 법학연구, (54), pp.241~261 (2014), 한국법학회
  23. 현소혜, "한정승인 제도의 개선방안에 관하여", 국제법무, 11(1), pp.141~173 (2019), 법과정책연구원[DOI]
  24. 홍춘의, "상속재산의 강제집행절차에 있어서 상속채권자와 한정승인을 한 상속인의 조세채권자 사이의 우열관계 - 대법원 2016. 5. 24. 선고 2015다250574 판결을 중심으로 -", 동북아법연구, 10(3), pp.947~985 (2017), 동북아법연구소[DOI]
  25. 中川善之助, "新版注釋民法(26), 相續(1)" (1992), 有斐閣
  26. 谷口知平, "新版注釋民法(27), 相續(2)" (2000), 有斐閣
  27. 金子宏, "租稅法" (2019), 弘文堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)