금융위기와 자본시장법 - 금융소비자보호를 중심으로 -
Paper on Financial Crisis And Capital Market and Financial Investment Services Provider Act – Focused on Financial Consumer
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Financial crisis which started in 2007 is being continued for several years. In the effect of crisis, there are many debates on its cause and solutions. However,traders of financial products who are known as investors are divided into professional investors and normal investors under Financial Investment Services Provider Act. Normal investors have characters of consumers. These consumers equip characteristics such as weak position in the market, lack of information and professionalism and reliance to professional financier. Then normal investors may belong to consumers who are protected under Constitution Law Article 124. Including financial consumers into subject of consumer protection, this can be one of the methods to confront with financial crisis such as strengthening financial network. Protection of investors under Capital Market and Financial Investment Services Provider Act has critical defect that it was incompetent in its role as protection of individuals’ property and social financial network, due to too much emphasis on contract principle, which was proven during international financial crisis. In order to supplement this weakness, if we adopt the concept of ‘financial consumer protection’, and strengthen the area which is covered by it, this can be the backbone of prevention of transaction of toxic assets which is the evident of failure of financial market which is caused by market failure of individual with lack of information (for example, subprime mortagage situation) or market failure due to cut-throat competition of financial companies. This theory can be proven by the case in Canada where Financial Agency of Canada has limited the transaction of subprime by large banks to financial consumers, was able to avoid the Canada financial crisis. There foreth is paper will suggest on several things as a solution for financial crisis: first, the adoption of concept of financial consumer, second, a demand for supplemental system which concentrates on protection of investors’assets by applying the concept of financial consumer under Capital Market and Financial Investment Services Provider Act rather than protecting the rights of investors’, third, there is a need to build an exclusive responsible organization for financial consumer protection
Abstract
Financial crisis which started in 2007 is being continued for several years. In the effect of crisis, there are many debates on its cause and solutions. However,traders of financial products who are known as investors are divided into professional investors and normal investors under Financial Investment Services Provider Act. Normal investors have characters of consumers. These consumers equip characteristics such as weak position in the market, lack of information and professionalism and reliance to professional financier. Then normal investors may belong to consumers who are protected under Constitution Law Article 124. Including financial consumers into subject of consumer protection, this can be one of the methods to confront with financial crisis such as strengthening financial network. Protection of investors under Capital Market and Financial Investment Services Provider Act has critical defect that it was incompetent in its role as protection of individuals’ property and social financial network, due to too much emphasis on contract principle, which was proven during international financial crisis. In order to supplement this weakness, if we adopt the concept of ‘financial consumer protection’, and strengthen the area which is covered by it, this can be the backbone of prevention of transaction of toxic assets which is the evident of failure of financial market which is caused by market failure of individual with lack of information (for example, subprime mortagage situation) or market failure due to cut-throat competition of financial companies. This theory can be proven by the case in Canada where Financial Agency of Canada has limited the transaction of subprime by large banks to financial consumers, was able to avoid the Canada financial crisis. There foreth is paper will suggest on several things as a solution for financial crisis: first, the adoption of concept of financial consumer, second, a demand for supplemental system which concentrates on protection of investors’assets by applying the concept of financial consumer under Capital Market and Financial Investment Services Provider Act rather than protecting the rights of investors’, third, there is a need to build an exclusive responsible organization for financial consumer protection
참고문헌 (40)
- 국가발전정책연구원, "경제회복과 국가경쟁력 강화를 위한 재정정책 방향과 전략" (2009), (사) 국가발전정책연구원
- "금융위원회 보도자료, ｢금융위기 극복방안｣, 2009.12.18", ~ (2009)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2008), 법문사
- 김건식, "증권거래법(제4판)" (2006), 두성사
- 김동환, "자본시장통합법과 금융소비자 보호", 주간금융브리프, 16(26) (2007), 한국금융연구원
- 김정환, "리만 브라더스 사태와 글로벌 금융충격", 주간금융브리프, 17(36) (2008), 한국금융연구원
- 김병연, "증권투자권유규제에 대한 소고 - 자본시장통합법(안)과 관련하여 -", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.471~500 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
- 금융소비자보호제도의 주요 이슈와 개선방안, "김병연", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2009)
- 김병연, ",“금융소비자보호 전문 감독기관의 설립 필요성”, ｢주간 금융브리프｣, 제18권제28호(2009.7), 한국금융연구원; 同, “금융기관의 사회적 책임의식 고양을 통한소비자보호운동의 필요성”, ｢주간 금융브리프｣, 제18권 제37호(2009.9), 한국금융연구원; 同, “금융선진화의 과제와 금융소비자보호”, ｢주간 금융브리프｣, 제18권제49호(2009.12), 한국금융연구원; 同, “금융소비자보호 관련 법체계의 정비를 위한 제언”, ｢주간 금융브리프｣, 제19권 제3호(2010.1), 한국금융연구원", ~ (2010)
- 김원규, "21C 세계금융위기의 원인과 자본시장법의 과제", 경영법률, 19(3), pp.197~238 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
- 맹수석, "자본시장통합법상 금융투자자보호제도의 문제점과 예금보험제도의 개선방안", 금융안정연구, 9(2), pp.105~144 (2008), 예금보험공사
- SERI 보고서로 읽는 글로벌 경제위기, "삼성경제연구소", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2009)
- 성승제, "자본시장통합법과 미국법상 적합성 원칙", 법제연구, (36), pp.375~405 (2009), 한국법제연구원
- 재정사업에 있어 정책금융의 효율성 제고를 위한 법제개선방안, "성승제", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2008)
- 안수현, "(가칭)자본시장통합법과 소비자보호법의 접점 - ‘금융소비자의 보호’", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.199~248 (2006), 한국증권법학회
- 안수현, "금융소비자 보호와 자본시장법의 과제", 기업법연구, 22(4), pp.73~122 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 양석완, "판례로 본 증권투자권유에 따른 적합성원칙", 기업법연구, 12, pp.299~330 (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 유정석, "서브프라임 파장과 세계경제불안", SERI 경제 포커스, (178) (2008), 삼성경제연구소
- 주요국 금융규제개혁에 관한 비교연구, "이종한", 한국행정연구원, ~ (2006)
- 재정경제부, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률안 설명자료", ~ (2006)
- 전창환, "2008년 미국의 금융위기와 오바마 정부의 새로운 뉴딜?: 금융안정화 및 금융규제 개혁정책을 중심으로", 동향과 전망, (78), pp.250~293 (2010), 한국사회과학연구회
- 정순섭, "자본시장통합법의 구조와 내용" (2006)
- 정후식, "대공황 이후 주요 금융위기 비교-위기의 원인 및 영향을 중심으로-" (2009), 한국은행
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제16판)" (2009), 박영사
- 정순섭, "금융규제개혁과 금융소비자 보호", 한국상사판례학회 정기총회 및 제101회 정기학술대회 자료집 (2010)
- 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법(주석서Ⅰ)" (2009), 박영사
- 자본시장연구원, "미국금융소비자보호청(CFPA)법안(해외입법동향)", ~ (2009)
- 高木仁外, "金融システムの國際比較分析" (2000), 東洋經濟新報社
- 櫻井健夫, "金融商品取引法ハンドブック-證券ㆍ保險ㆍ預金の法律と裁判實務" (2002), 日本評論社
- Anna J. Schwartz, "Origins of the Financial Market Crisis of 2008" (2009), CATO
- Barry Bosworth, "America's Financial Crisis : The End of An Era, The Brookings Institution", Paper to be Presented at ADBI Conferece: Global Financial and Economic Crisis: Impacts, Lessons and Growth Prebalancing (2009)
- Cary, William L., "Corporations, unabridged, 7th ed" (1995), The Foundation Press, Inc.
- Llewellyn, David, "The Economic Rational for Financial Regulation", FSA Occasional Paper Series, (1) (1999)
- Thomas Lee Hazen, "The Law of Securitites Regulation" (2005), St. Paul Thomson West
- U.S.Department of the Treasury,Financial regulatory reform:A New foundation:Rebuilding financial supervision and regulation, "U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial regulatory reform: A New foundation: Rebuilding financial supervision and regulation", ~ (2009)