2010년 改正商法에 대한 管見
Some Thoughts on the 2010 Amendments to the Commercial Code
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In January 2009, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) proposed and submitted the bill to amend the parts of the general provisions and the commercial activities of the Commercial Code to the National Assembly. On April 21, 2010, the National Assembly finally passed the bill, which entered into effect as Law No. 10281 on December 15, 2010. The Commercial Code has been revised many times since its enactment in 1962, however, the most significant changes have been brought to two parts of the previous code in 2010. These amendments were a much more comprehensive package purported to achieve several goals: First of all, the amendments were intended to get rid of legislative errors which have been neglected since the law is established. For example, Article 55 was applied only to a loan “between merchants” under the previous code and now is revised to apply even to a loan between a merchant and a non-merchant. Secondly, the amendments tried to promote the integrity between the Commercial Code and the Civil Code. For instance, Article 52 regarding the binding force of offer of contract inter absentees was repealed in order to remove its difference with the Civil Code. Thirdly, Article 31 providing for the principles for valuation of assets was delisted from the Code for the adoption of global standard in the field of accounting. Fourthly, the payment and settlement business is newly classified in line with changes in commercial environment as one of basic commercial activities which are enumerated in Article 46. Fifthly, the liability of public entertainment businessman under the previous code was regarded as impractical and is thus mitigated with purpose of invigorating the tourism. Finally, articles concerning businesses of finance lease, franchise and factoring are newly provided in chapters 12, 13 and 14 of Part II.
Abstract
In January 2009, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) proposed and submitted the bill to amend the parts of the general provisions and the commercial activities of the Commercial Code to the National Assembly. On April 21, 2010, the National Assembly finally passed the bill, which entered into effect as Law No. 10281 on December 15, 2010. The Commercial Code has been revised many times since its enactment in 1962, however, the most significant changes have been brought to two parts of the previous code in 2010. These amendments were a much more comprehensive package purported to achieve several goals: First of all, the amendments were intended to get rid of legislative errors which have been neglected since the law is established. For example, Article 55 was applied only to a loan “between merchants” under the previous code and now is revised to apply even to a loan between a merchant and a non-merchant. Secondly, the amendments tried to promote the integrity between the Commercial Code and the Civil Code. For instance, Article 52 regarding the binding force of offer of contract inter absentees was repealed in order to remove its difference with the Civil Code. Thirdly, Article 31 providing for the principles for valuation of assets was delisted from the Code for the adoption of global standard in the field of accounting. Fourthly, the payment and settlement business is newly classified in line with changes in commercial environment as one of basic commercial activities which are enumerated in Article 46. Fifthly, the liability of public entertainment businessman under the previous code was regarded as impractical and is thus mitigated with purpose of invigorating the tourism. Finally, articles concerning businesses of finance lease, franchise and factoring are newly provided in chapters 12, 13 and 14 of Part II.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강정혜, "금융리스에 대한 개정 상법안의 쟁점", 상사법연구, 28(2), pp.39~59 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 김교창, "표현지배인", 법정, 22(3) (1967), 법정사
- 김권회, "상법총칙 및 상행위편 개정안에 대한 토론문(3)", 상법 총칙 및 상행위편개정안 상법 항공운송편 제정안 공청회 자료집 (2008), 법무부
- 김선광, "상행위개념의 변화와 상법개정 -방송·지급결제업무를 중심으로-·", 상사법연구, 28(2), pp.9~33 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 김성태, "강론" (2002), 법문사
- 김홍기, "채권매입업(factoring)의 법적 쟁점과 상법개정안의 검토", 상사법연구, 28(2), pp.107~150 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 김화진, "상법입문" (2010), 박영사
- 상사법무과, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위 개정이유" (2008), 법무부
- 신현윤, "상법총칙·상행위법 개정안의 주요쟁점", 상사판례연구, 21(3), pp.3~30 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
- 심영, "우리나라 회사회계제도의 현황과 발전방향", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.349~376 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 이철송, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위" (2010), 박영사
- 이형규, "상법총칙 및 상행위편 개정안에 대한 토론문(1)", 상법 총칙 및 상행위편개정안 상법 항공운송편 제정안 공청회 자료집 (2008), 법무부
- 임재호, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법의 입법체계", 상사판례연구, (14) (2003), 한국상사판례학회
- 정경영, "상법총칙, 상행위편 개정의견", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 정병덕, "상행위법의 현대화과제", 기업법연구, 24(3), pp.9~34 (2010), 한국기업법학회
- 조동관, "상법 총칙·상행위편 개정 과정과 주요 쟁점 - 국회 법제사법위원회 심사 과정을 중심으로 -", 선진상사법률연구, (51), pp.137~164 (2010), 법무부
- 지급결제연구회, "지급결제제도의 이해" (2006), 금융연구원
- 진정구, "(정부 제출) 검토보고" (2009), 법제사법위원회
- 최영홍, "프랜차이즈 관련 상법 개정안의 고찰", 상사법연구, 28(2), pp.69~105 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 최준선, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법" (2009), 삼영사
- Gary Slapper, "English Law", ~ (2000)
