2011년 改正商法(會社編)의 主要內容 및 向後 課題
A Study on the Major Contents and Tasks to be Improved in the Revised Commercial Code of 2011
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, the Commercial Code was dynamically amended or enacted for internationalization and advancement, and revised Commercial Code promulgated on 14 April 2011 and entered into force on April 15, 2012. The Commercial Code of 2011 which was amended or newly made more than 260 provisions is evaluated as the biggest one since the enactment of the Commercial Code in 1962. The revised Commercial Code mainly introduced new corporate forms such as the Limited Partnership(LP) and Limited Liability Companies(LLC) for promoting free and creative corporate management. Furthermore, it diversified and refined a class of shares, as well as introducing non par value share system for the facilitation of funding. It also simplified the inspector’ investigation and report procedure about investment in kind, and allowed set-off the payment of share with the consent of the corporate and acquisition of corporate’s own stock within the profit available for dividends. Moreover, it restricted the limit of a reserve fund and liberalized decision procedure of dividends. This revised Commercial Code not only diversified the kinds of bond but also abolished the limit of total amount of bond issuance. And it softened the merger consideration and exempted director’s liability. In addition, the amended Commercial Code introduced officer as well as compliance officer system, expanded the application scope of self-dealing and incorporated usurption of corporate opportunity for management transparency. Besides, the amended Commercial Code accorded accounting-related provisions with the International Financial Reporting Standard(IFRS) in order to allow the introduction of global standards for the advancement of the company’s management and adopted the electronic registration system of stocks and bonds. However, it still needs the complementary work for consistency between the provisions or systems which were mismatched because of lack of thorough examination before the amendment. Moreover the maintenance of provisions regarding corporate social responsibility(CSR) and business ethics for achieving economic democratization. And aside from this, there are some necessary parts to be considered such as modernization of penal provisions on the Code, reform of cumulative voting system, introduction of multiple derivative suit assuming of a holding company, improvement ways of electronic voting system, officer system reform for efficient corporate governance and introduction of the warrant and leveraged buy out(LBO).
Abstract
Recently, the Commercial Code was dynamically amended or enacted for internationalization and advancement, and revised Commercial Code promulgated on 14 April 2011 and entered into force on April 15, 2012. The Commercial Code of 2011 which was amended or newly made more than 260 provisions is evaluated as the biggest one since the enactment of the Commercial Code in 1962. The revised Commercial Code mainly introduced new corporate forms such as the Limited Partnership(LP) and Limited Liability Companies(LLC) for promoting free and creative corporate management. Furthermore, it diversified and refined a class of shares, as well as introducing non par value share system for the facilitation of funding. It also simplified the inspector’ investigation and report procedure about investment in kind, and allowed set-off the payment of share with the consent of the corporate and acquisition of corporate’s own stock within the profit available for dividends. Moreover, it restricted the limit of a reserve fund and liberalized decision procedure of dividends. This revised Commercial Code not only diversified the kinds of bond but also abolished the limit of total amount of bond issuance. And it softened the merger consideration and exempted director’s liability. In addition, the amended Commercial Code introduced officer as well as compliance officer system, expanded the application scope of self-dealing and incorporated usurption of corporate opportunity for management transparency. Besides, the amended Commercial Code accorded accounting-related provisions with the International Financial Reporting Standard(IFRS) in order to allow the introduction of global standards for the advancement of the company’s management and adopted the electronic registration system of stocks and bonds. However, it still needs the complementary work for consistency between the provisions or systems which were mismatched because of lack of thorough examination before the amendment. Moreover the maintenance of provisions regarding corporate social responsibility(CSR) and business ethics for achieving economic democratization. And aside from this, there are some necessary parts to be considered such as modernization of penal provisions on the Code, reform of cumulative voting system, introduction of multiple derivative suit assuming of a holding company, improvement ways of electronic voting system, officer system reform for efficient corporate governance and introduction of the warrant and leveraged buy out(LBO).
참고문헌 (24)
- 김건식, "회사법 제4판" (2013), 박영사
- 법무부, "개정상법(회사법)해설서", ~ (2012)
- 이철송, "회사법강의 제21판" (2013), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법 제8판" (2013), 삼영사
- 권재열, "개정상법상 주식관련제도의 개선내용과 향후과제", 선진상사법률연구, (56), pp.1~30 (2011), 법무부
- 권재열, "개정상법 제446조의2의 의의", 상사법연구, 30(3), pp.305~336 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 김순석, "미국의 배당규제와 자기주식 제도", 비교사법, 13(2), pp.251~283 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 김재호, "개정상법상 자기주식취득·처분제도", 상장 (2012)
- 김홍기, "2011년 개정상법 및 동법시행령상 회사재무분야의 주요쟁점과 해석 및 운용상의 과제", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.107~146 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 김태진, "개정 상법하의 집행임원제 운용을 위한 법적 검토", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.295~384 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 남유선, "개정상법 및 시행령상 기업지배구조변화에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.47~78 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 법무부, "법무부, 중소기업은 준법지원인 두지 않도록 시행령안 확정", ~ (2012)
- 박세화, "준법지원인제도의 안정적이고 효율적인 운용을 위한 법적 과제", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.253~293 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 손영화, "내부통제와 준법지원인제도", 선진상사법률연구, (60)통권 : 60, pp.146~172 (2012), 법무부
- 송양호, "상장회사특례규정 및 동시행령에 관한 검토 및 개선방안", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.147~184 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 송종준, "소수주식 전부취득제의 입법의도와 해석방향", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.79~106 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 안성포, "자기주식취득의 허용에 따른 법적 쟁점", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.73~104 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 정동윤, "개정상법의 해석에 관한 몇 가지 문제에 관하여 -보통주와 종류주의 개념을 중심으로 -", 상장 (2012)
- 정준우, "2011년 개정상법상 집행임원의 법적 지위에 관한 비판적 검토", 한양법학, (35), pp.449~482 (2011), 한양법학회
- 천경훈, "개정상법상 회사기회유용 금지규정의 해석론 연구", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.143~213 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 최문희, "주식회사 이사의 책임제한에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2004
- 최준선, "자기주식의 취득과 처분에 관한 약간의 문제", 상장 (2012)
- 최준선, "개정이 시급한 상법(회사법) 규정에 대한 연구", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.15~45 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 한국상장회사협의회, "상장회사 준법통제기준 표준모델", ~ (2012)
