중소기업의 원활한 사업승계를 위한 방안 - 2011년 개정상법 및 개정신탁법을 중심으로 -
A study on business succession of small company - Mainly focus on revised commercial law and trust law for 2011 -
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This Study has reviewed business succession methods of small company:multi-class share structure and trust structure, both of which are employed for smooth succession. To use multi-class share structure is very effective. However, in Korea, as there exist only a few multi-class shares, and as even those shares have not been considered being used as a tool for business succession, business succession based on multi-class share structure is significantly limited. On the other hand, trust structure enables the business succession to be done more simply. In terms of the establishment of trust, self-settled trust only requires the self-declaration of trust, and for other trust structures,trust agreement with trustee is sufficient. Also, with respect to the company’s decision, the successor, as a beneficiary status, can actively intervene with the company, e.g. by instructing the trustee to execute its voting right. Finally, trust agreement is valid even though the settlor(business manager) is deceased. Accordingly, the trust structure has a lots more advantages than the multi-class share structure as a method of business succession. However,there are some huddles to use the trust structure for business succession as its relationship with other positive laws such as the Commercial Law, the Civil Law and the Tax law. This Study suggests recommendations to remove possible barriers under the Commercial Law and the Capital Markets Act when multi-class share structure and trust structure are used for business succession.
Abstract
This Study has reviewed business succession methods of small company:multi-class share structure and trust structure, both of which are employed for smooth succession. To use multi-class share structure is very effective. However, in Korea, as there exist only a few multi-class shares, and as even those shares have not been considered being used as a tool for business succession, business succession based on multi-class share structure is significantly limited. On the other hand, trust structure enables the business succession to be done more simply. In terms of the establishment of trust, self-settled trust only requires the self-declaration of trust, and for other trust structures,trust agreement with trustee is sufficient. Also, with respect to the company’s decision, the successor, as a beneficiary status, can actively intervene with the company, e.g. by instructing the trustee to execute its voting right. Finally, trust agreement is valid even though the settlor(business manager) is deceased. Accordingly, the trust structure has a lots more advantages than the multi-class share structure as a method of business succession. However,there are some huddles to use the trust structure for business succession as its relationship with other positive laws such as the Commercial Law, the Civil Law and the Tax law. This Study suggests recommendations to remove possible barriers under the Commercial Law and the Capital Markets Act when multi-class share structure and trust structure are used for business succession.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김정수, "자본시장법원론" (2011), 서울파이낸스앤로그룹
- 법무부, "신탁법개정안해설", ~ (2010)
- 이재욱, "신탁법해설" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제19판)" (2011), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제13판)" (2010), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제19판)" (2011), 박영사
- 최동식, "신탁법" (2006), 법문사
- 江頭憲治郎, "株式会社法" (2009)
- 新井誠, "信託法" (2008)
- 新井誠, "新信託法の基礎と運用" (2007)
- 木内清章, "事業承継と信託" (2009)
- 安藤朝, "信託と事業活動" (2010), 信託の実務Q&A
- 권종호, "방어수단으로서 종류주식 ― 2006년 개정안과 2008년 개정안을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.51~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 권종호, "적대적 M&A방어수단의 도입 필요성 - 2008년 경영권방어법제 개선위원회의 입법초안을 중심으로", 상사판례연구, 22(4), pp.257~288 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
- 김은집, "유언대용신탁 및 수익자연속신탁 관련 자본시장법상 쟁점검토", 금융투자협회신탁포럼 발표자료 (2011)
- 김태진, "기업형태로서의 신탁 -사업신탁, 수익증권발행신탁 및 유한책임신탁을 중심으로", 법학논총, 31(2), pp.119~151 (2011), 법학연구소
- 송종준, "소수주주 강제퇴출법제의 국제적 신조류와 그 입법론적 수용 가능성 -미국,영국,독일법의 비교분석을 중심으로", 증권법연구, 6(1), pp.1~38 (2005), 한국증권법학회
- 심인숙, "수익권에 관한 「신탁법」 개정시안", 선진상사법률연구, (48), pp.53~91 (2009), 법무부
- 이준봉, "유언대용신탁 및 수익자연속신탁에 대한 과세", 금융투자협회신탁포럼 발표자료 (2011)
- 임채웅, "遺言信託 및 遺言代用信託의 硏究", 인권과 정의, (397), pp.124~143 (2009), 대한변호사협회
- 중소제조업 CEO 경영의욕 및 경영승계 의견조사 결과, "중소기업중앙회 조사통계팀", ~ (2006)
- 최봉길, "중소기업사업승계의 문제점과 개선방안 - 상속세 및 증여세를 중심으로", 기업법연구, 21(2), pp.67~96 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 최수정, "신탁법 및 민법상 논의 이슈", 금융투자협회신탁포럼 발표자료 (2011)
- 神作裕之, "事業信託としての自己信託の可能性", 事業信託の展望, 60 (2011), 公益財団法人 トラスト
- 尾本太郎, "新信託法の活用可能性ー改正概要と実務上の論点", 経理情報, (1140) (2007)
- 寺本昌広, "新信託法の解説(4)", 金融法務事情, (1796) (2007)
- 早坂文高, "事業信託について", 事業信託の展望, 60 (2011), 公益財団法人トラスト
- 後安治, "信託を活用した事業承継のしくみを知ろう", 税務広報 (2008)
