사업신탁에 관한 입법론적 고찰
A Study on Legislative Direction of Business Trust
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the year 2011, the Korean trust law revised on the whole and adopted a variety of provisions which opened doors to the formation of business trust. However, although the objective of the revised law is to promote the trust system in various areas, it might be still captured by the traditional mind-set and fail to highlight the unique features of business trust as a form of business organization. So, in order to realize the potential advantages of business trust, considering the recent legislative trends in the two most advanced legislation of business trust, the United States and Singapore, it seems to be supported by its own legislation reflecting the characteristics of the organizational law. According to the review of the policy trends in the two counties mentioned above, this comparative analysis gives an instinctive idea that the independent legislative scope of the business trust, apart from traditional trust, should include a provision that grant the business trust its own legal entity. On top of that, the legislative authority would better consider adopting various promotion policies as follows; (1) securing flexibility in fiduciary duties and rights, (2) reinforcing the protection of the rights of the beneficiary, (3) modifying the succession system of negative properties and employment, (4) introducing the unprecedented concepts such as series trust, conversion and merger of trust, (5) reorganizing the tax system, etc. From now on, further studies are needed to demonstrate the plausible benefits and distinctive characteristics of business trust and the proper legislative system should be ready for implementing this system more effectively. Last but definitely not least, with regard to business trust, paradigm shift, viewing it not as a mere contract but as an business organization, is positively required.
Abstract
In the year 2011, the Korean trust law revised on the whole and adopted a variety of provisions which opened doors to the formation of business trust. However, although the objective of the revised law is to promote the trust system in various areas, it might be still captured by the traditional mind-set and fail to highlight the unique features of business trust as a form of business organization. So, in order to realize the potential advantages of business trust, considering the recent legislative trends in the two most advanced legislation of business trust, the United States and Singapore, it seems to be supported by its own legislation reflecting the characteristics of the organizational law. According to the review of the policy trends in the two counties mentioned above, this comparative analysis gives an instinctive idea that the independent legislative scope of the business trust, apart from traditional trust, should include a provision that grant the business trust its own legal entity. On top of that, the legislative authority would better consider adopting various promotion policies as follows; (1) securing flexibility in fiduciary duties and rights, (2) reinforcing the protection of the rights of the beneficiary, (3) modifying the succession system of negative properties and employment, (4) introducing the unprecedented concepts such as series trust, conversion and merger of trust, (5) reorganizing the tax system, etc. From now on, further studies are needed to demonstrate the plausible benefits and distinctive characteristics of business trust and the proper legislative system should be ready for implementing this system more effectively. Last but definitely not least, with regard to business trust, paradigm shift, viewing it not as a mere contract but as an business organization, is positively required.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김병일, "신탁법 개정에 따른 신탁세제 개편 방향에 관한 연구", 조세연구, 10(2), pp.303~350 (2010), 한국조세연구포럼
- 김종해, "개정신탁법 시행에 따른 신탁과세구조의 개선방안", 세무와회계저널, 13(3), pp.421~448 (2012), 한국세무학회
- 노혁준, "사업신탁을 통한 기업재편의 가능성과 그 한계 – 시리즈 신탁을 중심으로", 통일사업을 위한 유한책임신탁의 활용방안 학술대회 발표자료 (2014), 전남대학교 법학연구소
- 법무부 상사법무과, "신탁법해설", 법조협회, ~ (2012)
- 성희활, "신탁법과 자본시장법의 바람직한 관계 설정에 대한 연구", 비교사법, 20(3), pp.637~674 (2013), 한국비교사법학회
- 손상호, "자본시장통합법(안)의 가능성과 한계", 주간 금융 브리프, 15(24) (2006), 한국금융연구원
- 안성포, "信託의 基本構造와 그 法理", 중앙법학, 9(2), pp.709~732 (2007), 중앙법학회
- 오성근, "사업신탁의 기업조직적 특징과 수익자책임법리", 기업법연구, 22(1), pp.419~454 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 이준봉, "세법 상 법적 실체인 신탁의 도입에 관한 검토", 성균관법학, 23(2), pp.415~453 (2011), 법학연구소
- 이중기, "신탁업무의 외부위탁에 대한 규제방안 : 개정방안을 중심으로", 홍익법학, 11(1), pp.355~375 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이중기, "기업의 분할과 자금조달수단으로서의 사업신탁 - 싱가포르와 홍콩의 경험을 중심으로", 신탁법제와 유동화법제 관련 최근 쟁점 학술대회 발표자료 (2014), 건국대학교 법학연구소
- 한원식, "信託稅制에 대한 硏究 : 納稅義務者를 中心으로", 박사, 조세법전공, pp.2013
- Carter G. Bishop, "Forgotten Trust: A Check-the-Box Achilles’ Heel", Suffolk University Law Review, 43 (2010)
- Steven L. Schwarcz, "Commercial Trusts as Business Organizations: An Invitation to Comparatists", DUKE J. COMP. & INT‘L L, 13, pp.321~ (2003)
- 法務省 民事局参事官室, "信託法改正要綱試案 補足説明", ~ (2005)
- 財務省, "法人税法の改正", 信託法の制定等に伴う税制上の措置(所得税関係), 平成19年度 税制改正の解説, 2007
- 中野正俊, "改正信託法評論", 亞細亞法學, 41(2) (2007), 亜細亜大学法学研究所
