예비화학교사들이 제작한 정적 모델의 특성 분석
Analysis of Characteristics of Static Models Produced by Pre-service Chemistry Teachers
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 표상적 측면과 설명적 측면에서 예비화학교사들이 제작한 정적 모델에서 나타난 모델의 본성을 분석하고, 이를 선행연구의 테크놀로지를 활용하여 제작한 동적 모델에서 나타난 모델의 본성과 비교 논의하였다. 또한 정적 모델의 목적을 분석하고 모델의 본성이 모델의 목적과 일치하는지 분석하였다. 정적 모델은 그림, 글, 수식 등을 활용하여 제작하였다. 본연구를 위하여 충청북도 지역에 있는 사범대학 3학년에 재학 중인 예비화학교사 18명을 선정하고, 이들에게 정적 모델을 제작하도록 요구하였으며, 제작한 모델에서 나타난 모델의 본성을 분석하고 모델의 목적을 알아보았다. 연구 결과, 정적 모델에 나타난 모델의 본성은 동적 모델에 비해 표상적 측면보다 설명적 측면을 적게 포함하고 있었다. 하지만 정적 모델의 목적은 표상적 측면보다 설명적 측면을 많이 포함하고 있었다. 또한 정적 모델에서 표상적 측면의 모델의 목적과 모델의 본성이 일치하였지만, 설명적 측면의 모델의 목적과 모델의 본성이 대부분 불일치하였다.
Abstract
In this study, the nature of model shown in the static models produced by pre-service chemistry teachers in terms of representational and explanatory aspects was analyzed, and this was compared and discussed with the nature of model shown in the dynamic models produced using the technology of previous studies. We also analyzed the purpose of the static model and analyzed whether the nature of model matches the purpose of model. A static model was produced using pictures, texts, and formulas. For this study, 18 pre-service chemistry teachers enrolled in the third year of a teacher's college in Chungcheongbuk-do were selected, and they were asked to produce a static models, and the nature of model shown in the produced model was analyzed, and the purpose of model was investigated. As a result of the study, the nature of model in the static model contained fewer explanatory aspects than the representational aspect compared to the dynamic model. However, the purpose of the static model included more explanatory aspects than the representational aspect. In addition, in the static model, the purpose of model in the representational aspect and the nature of model were consistent, but most of the purpose of model in the explanatory aspect and the nature of model were inconsistent.
참고문헌 (31)
- Cha, J. H., , Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 48, pp.638~ (2004)
- Gilbert, J. K., , International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, pp.115~ (2004)
- Oh, P. S., , Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28, pp.450~ (2009)
- Windschitl, M., , Science Education, 92, pp.941~ (2008)
- National Research Council, "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
- Penner, D. E., , Review of Research in Education, 25, pp.1~ (2001)
- Schwarz, C. V., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, pp.632~ (2009)
- Devi, R., , Instructional Science, 24, pp.259~ (1996)
- Gilbert, J. K., , International Journal of Science Education, 20, pp.83~ (1998)
- Luisi, P. L., , Naturwissenschaften, 77, pp.67~ (1990)
- NGSS Lead States, "Next Generation Science Standards:For States, By States" (2013), The National Academies Press
- The Ministry of Education, "Science curriculum", The Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
- The Ministry of Education, "Science curriculum", The Ministry of Education, ~ (2022)
- Osborne, R. J., , Journal of research in Science Teaching, 20, pp.825~ (1983)
- Cho, H. S, , Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37, pp.539~ (2017)
- Kim, J. H., , Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers Academic Presentation Papers, 29, pp.415~ (2012)
- Kim, S. K., , Journal of Chemical Education, 96, pp.2926~ (2019)
- Kim, E. J., "An Analysis of the Effect of Programming Teaching Based on the Procedural Viewpoint About Acid Base of 10th Grade Students", Master, pp.2019
- Lee, S. J., , Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 67, pp.241~ (2023)
- Kim, S. K., , Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 63, pp.102~ (2019)
- Jeong, N. J., , Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 67, pp.378~ (2023)
- Cho, H. S., , Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37, pp.239~ (2017)
- Forbes, C. T., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, pp.895~ (2015)
- Mendonca, P. C. C., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, pp.192~ (2014)
- Rouse, W. B., , Psychological Bulletin, 100, pp.349~ (1986)
- Zhang, B., , Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association of Educational Assessment (IAEA)on “Assessment in an Era of Rapid Change: Innovations and Best Practices” (2006)
- Hogan, K., , Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10, pp.319~ (2001)
- Sins, P. H. M., , International Journal of Science Education, 27, pp.1695~ (2005)
- Windschitl, M., , Science Education, 92, pp.941~ (2008)
- Hestenes, D., , A presentation at the NSF Modeling Conference (1993)
- Kozma, R. B., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, pp.949~ (1997)