논의-기반 모델링 전략을 이용한 일반화학실험에서 글쓰기 대상에 따른 예비화학교사들의 모델링 능력 및 모델링에 대한 인식 분석
Analysis of Preservice Chemistry Teachers’ Modelling Ability and Perceptions in Science Writing for Audiences of General Chemistry Experiment Using Argument-based Modeling Strategy
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 논의-기반 모델링 전략을 적용한 일반화학실험 수업에서 글쓰기 대상에 따른 과학 글쓰기가 예비 화학교사 들의 모델링 능력 및 모델링에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 또한 이와 함께 예비 화학교사들의 화학개념 이해에 미치는 영향도 알아보았다. 이를 위해서 사범대학 화학교육과에 재학 중인 예비 화학교사 1학년 18명을 대상 으로 11개 주제의 논의-기반 모델링 전략을 적용한 일반화학실험 수업을 진행하였다. 화학개념 이해는 사전과 사후의 화학개념 이해 검사 점수에 대한 효과크기를 비교하였다. 모델링 능력은 예비 화학교사들이 제시하는 모델을 설명, 표상화, 의사소통의 3 가지 영역으로 구분하여 집단의 효과크기를 분석하였으며, 모델링에 대한 인식을 알아보기 위해서 설문조사를 실시하였다. 분 석결과, 예비 화학교사의 화학개념 이해와 모델링 능력은 글쓰기 대상인 독자의 수준이 낮은 경우, 효과가 더 큰 것으로 나타났 으며 글쓰기 대상에 따른 집단에서 모델링에 대한 인식은 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만 모델링 과정을 경험함에 따라 예 비 화학교사들의 응답이 더 구체적으로 변해가는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of science writing for different audiences on preservice chemistry teachers’ chemistry concept understanding and modeling ability in general chemistry experiment activities using Argument-based Modeling (AbM) strategy. And we also examined preservice chemistry teachers’ perceptions of modeling in different audience groups. The participants of the study were 18 university students in the first grade of preservice chemistry teachers taking a general chemistry experiment course. They completed eleven topics of general chemistry experiment using argumentbased modeling strategy. The understanding of chemistry concept was compared with the effect size of pre- and post-chemistry concept test scores. To find out modeling ability, we analyzed level of model by each preservice chemistry teacher. Analytical framework for the modeling ability was composed of three elements, explanation, representation, and communication. The questionnaire was conducted to check up on preservice chemistry teacher’s recognition of modeling. The result of analyzing the effect of modeling for different audience on the understanding of chemistry concept and modeling ability, the preservice chemistry teachers’ were found to be more effective when the level of audience was low. There was no difference in the recognition of modeling between the groups for audience. However, we could confirm that the responses of preservice chemistry teachers are changed in concrete when they have an experience in succession on modeling.
참고문헌 (43)
- Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development, "2015 Revised national curriculum", Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Notice No. 2015-74, ~ (2015)
- Brown, J S., , Educational Researcher, 18, pp.32~ (1989)
- Lee, S Y., , Korean Language Education Research, 4, pp.67~ (1994)
- Vygotsky, L S., "Language and Thought" (1962), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press
- Gilbert, S W., "Understanding Models in Earth & Space Science" (2003), NSTA press
- Redish, E F., , American Journal of Physics, 62, pp.796~ (1994)
- Chamizo, J A., , Science & Education, 22, pp.1613~ (2013)
- Boulter, C J., "Developing models in science education", pp.41~57 (2000), Springer
- Lehrer, R., "Handbook of child psychology, 4", pp.153~ (2006)
- Halloun, I A., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, pp.1019~ (1996)
- Oh, P S., , International Journal of Science Education, 33, pp.1109~ (2011)
- Harrison, A G., , International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp.1011~ (2000)
- Justi, R S., , International Journal of Science Education, 24, pp.1273~ (2002)
- Windschitl, M, , Science Education, 87, pp.112~ (2003)
- Windschitl, M, , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, pp.481~ (2004)
- 조혜숙, "과학교육에서 모델 및 모델링에 대한 고찰 －메타모델링 지식을 중심으로－", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(2), pp.239~252 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Talanquer, V., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, pp.189~ (2013)
- Schwarz, C V., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, pp.632~ (2009)
- Passmore, C M., , International Journal of Science Education, 34, pp.1535~ (2012)
- Romberg, T A., "Understanding Mathematics and Science Matters", pp.3~26 (2005), Routledge
- Bybee, R W., , Science Teacher, 78, pp.34~ (2011)
- 조혜숙, "중학교 과학수업에 적용한 글쓰기를 활용한 논의-기반 모델링 전략의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(6), pp.583~592 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Kim, M C., "Trends in Research Studies on Scientific Writing", Master, pp.2015
- Prain, V., , Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, pp.609~ (2016)
- Midgette, E., , Reading and Writing, 21, pp.131~ (2008)
- Chen, Y., , Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10, pp.747~ (2009)
- Porter, J E, "Audience and Rhetoric: An Archaeological Composition of the Discourse Community" (1992), Prentice Hall
- McDermott, M., "Teaching Science", The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 58, pp.53~ (2012)
- Gunel, M., , Learning and Instruction, 19, pp.354~ (2009)
- Keys, C W., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, pp.1065~ (1999)
- 남정희, "논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), pp.922~936 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 허은아, "읽기틀을 이용한 탐구적 일반화학실험이 대학생의 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향", 박사, 화학교육학, pp.2011
- Lee, D W., "Investigation about the cognitive process of student’s modeling at modeling emphasized argument-based general chemistry experiment", Doctor, pp.2015
- Lesh, R A., "Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching", pp.159~173 (2003), Routledge
- Schwarz, C V., , Cognition and Instruction, 23, pp.165~ (2005)
- Sins, P H., , International Journal of Science Education, 27, pp.1695~ (2005)
- dos Santos, A K., , Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 10, pp.182~ (1994)
- White, B Y., , Cognition and Instruction, 16, pp.3~ (1998)
- Ingham, A M., , International Journal of Science Education, 13, pp.193~ (1991)
- Chabalengula, V M., , International Journal of Biology Educatio, 2, pp.1~ (2012)
- McDermott, M., , Journal of College Science Teaching, 41, pp.1~ (2011)
- Sampson, V., , Science Education, 92, pp.447~ (2008)
- Duschl, R A., , Studies in Science Education, 28, pp.39~ (2002)