테크놀로지를 활용한 모델의 평가와 수정 과정에서 나타난 예비화학교사의 모델의 본성에 대한 인식 변화: 보일 법칙을 중심으로
Changes in Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Cognition of the Nature of Model in the Evaluation and Modification Process of Models Using Technology: Focusing on Boyle’s Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 테크놀로지를 활용한 모델의 평가와 수정 과정에서 나타난 예비화학교사들의 모델의 본성에 대한 인식 변화를 분석하는 것이다. 모델의 본성에 대한 인식 변화는 선행연구에서 예비화학교사들에게 부족하다고 판단된 표상적 측면의 함축화와 간단화, 설명적 측면의 해석, 추론, 설명, 정량화를 중심으로 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 충청북도에 있는 사범대학의 3학년 예비화학교사 19명을 대상으로 테크놀로지를 활용하여 개발한 보일 법칙 관련 모델을 평가하고, 평가 결과를 바탕으로 모델을 수정하여 최종 평가하도록 요구하였다. 연구 결과, 표상적 측면의 간단화, 설명적 측면의 해석, 설명, 정량화에 대한 예비화학교사들의 인식이 모델의 평가와 수정 과정을 통해 긍정적으로 변화되었음을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서 모델의 본성에 대한 인식이 변화하기 위해서는 모델의 평가와 수정 과정이 핵심적인 역할을 하는 것을 알 수 있었다. 하지만 표상적 측면의 함축화와 설명적 측면의 추론에 대한 인식 변화는 거의 나타나지 않았다. 이러한 요소들에 대한 인식은 다른 요소들의 인식보다 변화하기 어려운 것으로 볼 수 있다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해서는 예비화학교사들을 위한 보다 정교한 교육 설계가 필요하다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze changes in pre-service chemistry teachers’ cognition of the nature of model in the evaluation and modification process of model using technology. Changes in cognition of the nature of model were analyzed focusing on the ‘Abstraction’ and ‘Simplification’ of the ‘Representational aspect’, ‘Interpretation’, ‘Reasoning’, ‘Explanation’ and ‘Quantification’ of the ‘Explanatory aspect’ that were deemed insufficient for pre-chemistry teachers in previous study. For this purpose, 19 third-year pre-service chemistry teachers at a teacher’s college in Chungcheongbuk-do were asked to evaluate the model related to Boyle’s law developed using technology, revise the model based on the evaluation results, and make a final evaluation. As a result of the study, it was confirmed that pre-service chemistry teachers’ cognition of ‘Simplification’ of the ‘Representational aspect’ and ‘Interpretation’, ‘Explanation’, and ‘Quantification’ of the ‘Explanatory aspect’ changed positively through the evaluation and modification process of the model. Therefore, it was found that the evaluation and modification process of the model plays a key role in changing the cognition of the nature of model. However, there was little change in cognition of ‘Abstraction’ of the ‘Representational aspect’ and ‘Reasoning’ of the ‘Explanatory aspect’. The cognition of these factors can be seen as more difficult to change than the cognition of other factors. To solve this problem, more sophisticated educational design for pre-service chemistry teachers is needed.
참고문헌 (31)
- Morrison, M., "Models as mediators", pp.10~ (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Gobert, J. D., , International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp.891~ (2000)
- Chamizo, J. A., , Science and Education, 22, pp.1613~ (2013)
- National Research Council, "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
- Oh, W. J., , Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21, pp.849~ (2021)
- Treagust, D. F., , International Journal of Science Education, 18, pp.213~ (1996)
- Gilbert, J. K., "Learning Science Through Models and Modelling", pp.53~66 (1998), wer Academic Publishers
- Treagust, D. F., "Chemistry: In A Matter of Understanding Representations, Subject-specific Instructional Methods and Activities", pp.239~267 (2001), Elsevier
- NGSS Lead States, "Next Generation Science Standards:For States, By States" (2013), The National Academies Press
- Cho, H. S., , Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37, pp.539~ (2017)
- The Ministry of Education, "Science Curriculum", The Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
- The Ministry of Education, "Science Curriculum", The Ministry of Education, ~ (2022)
- Kim, S. K., , Journal of Chemical Education, 96, pp.2926~ (2019)
- Schwarz, C. V., , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, pp.632~ (2009)
- Kang, N. H., , Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37, pp.143~ (2017)
- Schwarz, C. V., , Cognition and Instruction, 23, pp.165~ (2005)
- Zhang, B., , Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association of Educational Assessment (IAEA) on “Assessment in an Era of Rapid Change:Innovations and Best Practices” (2006)
- Clement, J. J., "An Instructional Model Derived from Model Construction and Criticism Theory", pp.23~43 (2008), Kluwer Academic
- Gobert, J. D., , International Journal of Science Education, 33, pp.653~ (2011)
- Baek, H., "Models and modeling", pp.195~218 (2011), Springer
- Cho, H. S., , Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37, pp.239~ (2017)
- Stewart, J., , Educational Psychologist, 27, pp.317~ (1992)
- Uhm, J. H., , Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40, pp.543~ (2020)
- Jeong, N. J., , Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 67, pp.378~ (2023)
- Gilbert, J. K., , International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, pp.115~ (2004)
- Gilbert, J. K., "Visualization: In An Emergent Field of Practice and Enquiry in Science Education", pp.3~24 (2008), Springer
- Hogan, K., , Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10, pp.319~ (2001)
- Vosniadou, S., , Learning and Instruction, 4, pp.45~ (1994)
- Sins, P. H. M., , International Journal of Science Education, 27, pp.1695~ (2005)
- Windschitl, M., , Science Education, 92, pp.941~ (2008)
- Hestenes, D., , American Journal of Physics, 55, pp.440~ (1987)