본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Importance of Pragmatic Equivalence in Translation

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

It is important to translate a source language into a target language with syntactic and semantic equivalence. However, it is not enough. There may arise various kinds of translation problems due to the pragmatic and sociocultural differences between source and target language. It is important to capture and convey the pragmatic and sociocultural equivalence between source and target language in translation. In this paper I discuss illocutionary acts and the maxims of the cooperative principle coming into play in communication, explaining how they function in conveying non-literal messages. I suggested various examples of Korean and English expressions the meaning of which cannot be correctly communicated in case they are literally translated. I showed how they must be translated. I argued that it is important to translate a source language into a target language so that a writer’s/speaker’s communicative intention can be properly conveyed without distortion. This paper shows how important it is for translators to be careful to communicate the writer’s/speaker’s communicative intention maintaining the pragmatic and sociocultural equivalence between source and target language expressions, especially when the source and target languages are so different linguistically and non-linguistically like Korean and English.

Abstract

It is important to translate a source language into a target language with syntactic and semantic equivalence. However, it is not enough. There may arise various kinds of translation problems due to the pragmatic and sociocultural differences between source and target language. It is important to capture and convey the pragmatic and sociocultural equivalence between source and target language in translation. In this paper I discuss illocutionary acts and the maxims of the cooperative principle coming into play in communication, explaining how they function in conveying non-literal messages. I suggested various examples of Korean and English expressions the meaning of which cannot be correctly communicated in case they are literally translated. I showed how they must be translated. I argued that it is important to translate a source language into a target language so that a writer’s/speaker’s communicative intention can be properly conveyed without distortion. This paper shows how important it is for translators to be careful to communicate the writer’s/speaker’s communicative intention maintaining the pragmatic and sociocultural equivalence between source and target language expressions, especially when the source and target languages are so different linguistically and non-linguistically like Korean and English.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Austin, J., "How to Do Things with Words" (1962), Oxford University Press
  2. Chomsky, N, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  3. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  4. Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use" (1986), Prager
  5. Chomsky, N., "Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  6. Fromkin, V., "An Introduction to Language" (2003), Wardsworth
  7. Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts", pp.43~58 (1975), Academic Press
  8. Haegeman, L., "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" (1994), Blackwell
  9. Kӧvecses, Z., "Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feelings" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  10. Kӧvecses, Z., "Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  11. Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1990), University of Chicago Press
  12. Lakoff, G., "Metaphors We live By" (1980), University of Chicago Press
  13. Lakoff, G., "Cultural Models in Language and Thought", pp.195~221 (1987), Cambridge University Press
  14. 이광호, "A Comparative Study of American English and Korean Metaphoric", 현대영미어문학, 24(2), pp.173~192 (2006), 현대영미어문학회
  15. 이광호, "한", 영 통사 구조 차이와 통ㆍ번역의 문제 - 하위범주화, 2015, pp.13(1), 1~18[DOI]
  16. 이광호, "한", 영 의문사 의문문의 통ㆍ번역, 2016, pp.14(1), 163~185[DOI]
  17. Nida, E. A., "Toward a Science of Translating" (1964), E. J. Brill
  18. O’Grady, W., "Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction" (2012), Pearson Canada
  19. O’Grady, W., "Contemporary Linguistics:An Introduction" (1991), St. Martin’s Press
  20. Radford, A., "Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  21. Saeed, J., "Semantics" (2009), Wiley-Blackwell
  22. Searl, J., "Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language" (1969), Cambridge University Press
  23. Yule, G., "Pragmatics" (1996), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)