「諺文字母」와 『訓民正音』 字母의 차이에 대하여
On the difference of Eonmun letters and Huminjeongeum letters
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, I tried to reveal the difference between Eonmun letters and Hunminjeongeum letters. In our academia, we generally see Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum as the same. Eonmun is considered the name attached importance to the Korean writing function or commonly used name, while Hunminjeongeum is considered the name emphasizing the function to write the Chinese phonetic value or formally used name. However, Eonmun, which means letters, and Hunminjeongeum, which means sound, can be seen as distinctive. There is also a discussion that Hunminjeongeum was first created and that the Eonmun was made by selecting only the words needed to spell Korean. But Eonmun was made in 1443, Hunminjeongeum was made in 1446. Various sources point to the fact that Eonmun was first created and that Hunminjeongeum, which complemented the Chinese phonetic alphabet, was created when the appeal against it was posted. Shin Sook-ju, Sung Sam-mun and others went to meet and question the phonetic value of Chinese characters to Hwang Chan in Liaodong Province after 1445 for the completion of Hunminjeongeum and the compiling of Donggukjeongun(東國正韻). The Eonmun Office had already been installed since December 1443 and before February 1444, and which is also the logical basis that Eonmun was created before Hunminjeongeum. Also, the fact that the name of the Eonmun consonants is pronounced completely differently in the Hunminjeongeum system also provides ground for the fact that Eonmun was made before Hunminjeongeum. Meanwhile, the Korean translation of Lăoqĭdà(老乞大), Samun Seong-hwi(三韻聲彙), Gyujangjeon-un(奎章全韻), and others used Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum together. The decisive difference between Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum lies in the precision of phonetic transcription. Even if the Korean language can be perfectly written with Eonmun, it cannot accurately represent the sound of a foreign language such as Chinese or Mongolian. It's no different from the situation where we can't properly represent the pitch of English in Korean. Only by accurately recognizing the difference between Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum, it will be possible to correctly mark the current foreign language pronunciation.
Abstract
In this article, I tried to reveal the difference between Eonmun letters and Hunminjeongeum letters. In our academia, we generally see Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum as the same. Eonmun is considered the name attached importance to the Korean writing function or commonly used name, while Hunminjeongeum is considered the name emphasizing the function to write the Chinese phonetic value or formally used name. However, Eonmun, which means letters, and Hunminjeongeum, which means sound, can be seen as distinctive. There is also a discussion that Hunminjeongeum was first created and that the Eonmun was made by selecting only the words needed to spell Korean. But Eonmun was made in 1443, Hunminjeongeum was made in 1446. Various sources point to the fact that Eonmun was first created and that Hunminjeongeum, which complemented the Chinese phonetic alphabet, was created when the appeal against it was posted. Shin Sook-ju, Sung Sam-mun and others went to meet and question the phonetic value of Chinese characters to Hwang Chan in Liaodong Province after 1445 for the completion of Hunminjeongeum and the compiling of Donggukjeongun(東國正韻). The Eonmun Office had already been installed since December 1443 and before February 1444, and which is also the logical basis that Eonmun was created before Hunminjeongeum. Also, the fact that the name of the Eonmun consonants is pronounced completely differently in the Hunminjeongeum system also provides ground for the fact that Eonmun was made before Hunminjeongeum. Meanwhile, the Korean translation of Lăoqĭdà(老乞大), Samun Seong-hwi(三韻聲彙), Gyujangjeon-un(奎章全韻), and others used Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum together. The decisive difference between Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum lies in the precision of phonetic transcription. Even if the Korean language can be perfectly written with Eonmun, it cannot accurately represent the sound of a foreign language such as Chinese or Mongolian. It's no different from the situation where we can't properly represent the pitch of English in Korean. Only by accurately recognizing the difference between Eonmun and Hunminjeongeum, it will be possible to correctly mark the current foreign language pronunciation.
참고문헌 (33)
- "『訓民正音』 解例本ㆍ諺解本", ~
- "東國正韻", ~
- "東文選", ~
- "世宗實錄", ~
- "四家集", ~
- "三灘集", ~
- "燃藜室記述", ~
- "五洲衍文長箋散稿", ~
- "四聲通解", ~
- "三韻聲彙", ~
- "靑莊館全書", ~
- "奎章全韻", ~
- "論語", ~
- "孟子", ~
- "禮記", ~
- "春秋左氏傳", ~
- 강남욱, "‘諺文’과 ‘正音’의 文獻 記錄 樣相으로 본 새 문자 創製 意義에 대한 再解釋", 어문연구, 44(4), pp.9~11 (2016), 한국어문교육연구회
- 강창석, "「諺文字母」의 작성 주체와 시기에 대하여", 언어와 정보사회, 22, pp.41~46 (2014), 서강대 언어정보연구소
- 구현아, "『奎章全韻』의 華音 體系 硏究", 석사, pp.2008
- 김슬옹, "조선시대 언문의 제도적 사용 연구", pp.22~ (2005), 한국문화사
- 김영미, "훈민정음ㆍ정음ㆍ언문의 명칭 의미", 인문과학연구, 44, pp.211~233 (2015), 강원대학교 인문과학연구소
- 이근우, "훈민정음은 한글인가", pp.76~79 (2016), 어문학사
- 이근우, "언문청의 창제시기와 정음청의 위치", 인문사회과학연구, 17(1), pp.349~374 (2016), 부경대학교 인문사회과학연구소
- 이근우, "언문과 훈민정음의 성립시기에 대하여", 한국어학, 75, pp.189~222 (2017), 한국어학회
- 이동림, "훈민정음의 창제경위에 대하여 – 언문자모 27자는 최초 원안이다", 국어국문학논집, 64, pp.10~ (1974), 국어국문학회
- 이상규, "≪세종실록≫분석을 통한 한글 창제 과정의 재검토", 한민족어문학, 65, pp.31~51 (2013), 한민족어문학회
- 이상혁, "언문과 국어의식", 국어국문학, 121, pp.55~73 (1998), 국어국문학회
- 이준환, "『삼운성휘』 한자음 성모체계 고찰", 석사, 국어학, pp.2003
- 정광, "훈민정음의 사람들", pp.34~36 (2006), 제이앤씨
- 정광, "『몽고자운연구』 자료편", pp.207~ (2009), 박문사
- 홍윤표, "한글이야기1", pp.23~25 (2013), 태학사
- 홍현보, "우리 사전의 왜곡된 ‘언문’ 뜻풀이에 관한 연구", 한글, 298, pp.81~82 (2012), 한글학회
