금강경의 당위성 연결어 하이고(何以故)의 한역, 한글, 영역본의 번역양상에 대한 비교연구
A Comparative Study on the Diamond Sutra’s Translation of Reasoning Connector ‘何以故’ to Korean and English
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at studying Diamond Sutra and its translations. Diamond Sutra is one of the most influential Buddhist teachings to reach nirvana, the perfection of wisdom. When the standard translation of Diamond Sutra in Korean was completed by Korean Buddhism headquarter in 2009, the comparative analysis on the Diamond Sutra with different languages–the Chinese, the Korean, and the English translation are available. This study will compare the negation logic and the reasoning connectors in Chinese translation of 何以故 with those of Korean translation and English versions. Interestingly Diamond Sutra in the Chinese transition is composed of 275 sentences, but Korean has 289, and English has 546 sentences, which is a technical device to achieve the dynamic equivalence in Nida’s sense between the low context languages and high context ones. Of those 50 negation structures found in the Diamond Sutra, 何以故 is used 39 times to provide the reasons for negation in Chinese; Korean translation contains 35 counterparts and similar other expressions; English translation shows more diverse counter expressions, which also verifies how culture is incorporated in the process of translation.
Abstract
This study aims at studying Diamond Sutra and its translations. Diamond Sutra is one of the most influential Buddhist teachings to reach nirvana, the perfection of wisdom. When the standard translation of Diamond Sutra in Korean was completed by Korean Buddhism headquarter in 2009, the comparative analysis on the Diamond Sutra with different languages–the Chinese, the Korean, and the English translation are available. This study will compare the negation logic and the reasoning connectors in Chinese translation of 何以故 with those of Korean translation and English versions. Interestingly Diamond Sutra in the Chinese transition is composed of 275 sentences, but Korean has 289, and English has 546 sentences, which is a technical device to achieve the dynamic equivalence in Nida’s sense between the low context languages and high context ones. Of those 50 negation structures found in the Diamond Sutra, 何以故 is used 39 times to provide the reasons for negation in Chinese; Korean translation contains 35 counterparts and similar other expressions; English translation shows more diverse counter expressions, which also verifies how culture is incorporated in the process of translation.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김무봉, "금강경언해의 번역에 관련된 몇 가지 문제", 한국사상과 문화, (40), pp.267~299 (2007), 한국사상문화학회
- 김무봉, "불경언해와 간경도감(刊經都監)", 동아시아불교문화, (6), pp.3~49 (2010), 동아시아불교문화학회
- 김언주, "금강경언해에 나타난 부정문의 양상", 우리말연구, (30), pp.145~171 (2012), 우리말학회
- 김영일, "『금강경』의 구조에 대한 시론 ―소위 ‘3주ㆍ7절의 문답구조’―", 불교연구, (30), pp.121~153 (2009), 한국불교연구원
- 김용철, "15세기 후반 조선의 불경번역운동과 “왕의 형상”", 동양문화연구, 18, pp.215~237 (2014), 동양문화연구원
- 김호귀, "금강경 의 판본고찰: 구마라집본을 중심으로", 조계종 표준금강경 편찬관련 학술회의 자료 모음집 (2002)
- 민명진, "기독교 경전번역의 이론과 실제: 팔리 대장경 우리말 옮김" (1990), 팔리 대장경 우리말 옮김. 경전연구소
- 박윤철, "A Study on Chinese Character-Korean Translation of Causeand Effect in the Text of the Diamond Sutra", 통번역교육연구, 14(2), pp.139~155 (2016), 한국통번역교육학회
- 석진호, "금강경연구" (1999), 출판시대
- 이성운, "금강경 '우리말화'에 대한 언어학적 연구", 석사, 불교사학, pp.2005
- 정경숙, "대한불교조계종 표준본 금강경, : 한문 교감과 한글 번역을 중심으로. 동국대학교. 조계종 표준. 금강반야바라밀경" (2010), 조계종 출판사
- 최태옥, "『금강경』 번역의 한중일 비교연구 - 붓다의 호칭을 중심으로 -", 日本語敎育, (76), pp.61~76 (2016), 한국일본어교육학회
- Harrison. Paul., "Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā: A New English Translation of the Sanskrit Text Based" (2006), Greater Gandhāra Hermes Publishing
- Harrison. Paul, "“Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā.”BuddhistManuscripts in the Schøyen Collection 3", pp.89~132 (2006)
- Lakoff. George, "Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate" (2004), Chelsea Green
- Müller. Max, "The Vagrakkhedika or diamond-cutter. in Buddhist Mahayana Texts (Sacred Books of the East)" (2001), Oxford University Press Translation
- Nagatomo. Shigenori, "The Logic of the Diamond Sutra: A is not A. therefore it is A", Asian Philosophy, 10(3), pp.217~244 (2000)
- Nida. E. A., "Toward a science of translating" (1964), E. J. Brill
- Nida. E., "The Translation Studies Reader" (2000), Routledge
- Watanabe. Suwako, "Framing in Discourse", pp.176~209 (1993), OUP
- "한국민족문화대백과"[URL]
- "위키피디아"[URL]
- "네이버 지식백과"[URL]
- "조계종 표준 한문ㆍ한글 <금강경> 봉정 (2009.01.20.)"[URL]