『금강경』 번역의 한중일 비교연구 - 붓다의 호칭을 중심으로 -
A Comparative Study on the Translation of the Diamond Sutra in Korea, China and Japan: Focusing on the Buddha Appellation
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main focus for this study is to figure out differences of scripture translation according to each translator(Kumārajīva and Xuanzang)’s perception. Both two translators have been remarked as top experts in the Sanskrit Sutras translation field. There are different view points of translation due to the fact that Kumārajīva showed literal translation, Xuanzang mainly used liberal translation. In this study, the purpose is to find out differences between two translations through Buddha appellation presented in the Diamond Sutra. Kumārajīva used 4 naming(如來, 佛, 世尊, 釋迦牟尼), whereas Xuanzang handled 8 naming system include “如來, 佛, 世尊, 釋迦牟尼”. Furthermore, in the use of naming, they held differing views even in the same sentences. Kumārajīva adopted Buddha 206 times, but Xuanzang showed 396 appearance frequency about name of Buddha, and this implies different perception of the translators. In the matter of researching Buddha appellation through Sutras translated into Chinese in Korea and Japan which are under equal East Asian Chinese character cultural sphere, there were not significant differences. This study suggests there is not only translator's perception but also cultural homogeneity might affect translation tasks.
Abstract
The main focus for this study is to figure out differences of scripture translation according to each translator(Kumārajīva and Xuanzang)’s perception. Both two translators have been remarked as top experts in the Sanskrit Sutras translation field. There are different view points of translation due to the fact that Kumārajīva showed literal translation, Xuanzang mainly used liberal translation. In this study, the purpose is to find out differences between two translations through Buddha appellation presented in the Diamond Sutra. Kumārajīva used 4 naming(如來, 佛, 世尊, 釋迦牟尼), whereas Xuanzang handled 8 naming system include “如來, 佛, 世尊, 釋迦牟尼”. Furthermore, in the use of naming, they held differing views even in the same sentences. Kumārajīva adopted Buddha 206 times, but Xuanzang showed 396 appearance frequency about name of Buddha, and this implies different perception of the translators. In the matter of researching Buddha appellation through Sutras translated into Chinese in Korea and Japan which are under equal East Asian Chinese character cultural sphere, there were not significant differences. This study suggests there is not only translator's perception but also cultural homogeneity might affect translation tasks.
참고문헌 (18)
- 강경구, "『금강경』 한글 번역 및 해석의 현황과 특징", 동아시아불교문화, (6), pp.89~122 (2010), 동아시아불교문화학회
- 강경구, "6종 漢譯 ≪金剛經≫에 나타난 의미의 전달과 의미의 생성", 중국학, (37), pp.195~216 (2010), 대한중국학회
- 김경희, "번역자에 따른 번역의 차이 - 『서울1964년 겨울』의 프랑스어 번역본을 중심으로", 불어불문학연구, (72), pp.145~171 (2007), 한국불어불문학회
- 문을식, "현장의 五種不飜의 음역 이론의 연구", 불교연구, (26), pp.265~296 (2007), 한국불교연구원
- 원철, "구역과 신역", 월간 海印, (197) (1998), 해인사
- 李健準, "『金剛經』 漢譯諸本에 관한 고찰 : vajracchedikaprajnaparamita와 비교하여", 석사, 불교학, pp.1998
- "인물로 읽는 동아시아 역경사", 이종철[URL]
- 이종철, "중국불경의 탄생" (2009), (주)창비
- 이현우, "漢譯佛經의 音譯語에 관한 고찰", 중국어문학논집, 21, pp.191~214 (2002), 중국어문학연구회
- 조현숙, "조계종 표준 『금강경』에 나타난 佛名號에 대한 검토", 대학원연구논집, 3, pp.293~325 (2010), 중앙승가대학교 대학원
- 小澤憲珠, "금강반야경의 범본과 한역본", 불교학보, 11, pp.255~ (1974), 동국대 불교문화연구원
- 中村元, "般若心経・金剛般若経", pp.41~ (1992), 岩波文庫
- "고려대장경연구소"[URL]
- "동국대학교 동국역경원"[URL]
- "한글대장경"[URL]
- "近代デジタルライブラリー"[URL]
- "大藏經テキストデータベース研究会"[URL]
- "中華電子佛典協會"[URL]
