영한번역에서의 시제의 등가성과 기계번역과의 비교: 영어 현재진행형을 중심으로
Tense Equivalence in Translation from English to Korean by focusing on English Present Progressives
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on how tense equivalence is maintained when English present progressives are translated into Korean and on how university students' translations are different from those derived from translation machines. The source text is selected from COCA according to Vendler's verb categories. Based on the analyses of 30 students' questionnaires, two findings are identified. First, the tense equivalence in English-Korean translation is affected by verbal types. The activity verbs strongly keep the tense equivalence and then achievement and accomplishment verbs follow. The tense equivalence in state verbs is relatively weak. Second, the machine translation keeps the tense equivalence between source and target texts, but students seem to use several tenses: the present, the progressive, the future, and the past. With regard to abstract nouns, adjectives, adverbs, adverb phrases, the machine produces more monotonous translations than students.
Abstract
This paper focuses on how tense equivalence is maintained when English present progressives are translated into Korean and on how university students' translations are different from those derived from translation machines. The source text is selected from COCA according to Vendler's verb categories. Based on the analyses of 30 students' questionnaires, two findings are identified. First, the tense equivalence in English-Korean translation is affected by verbal types. The activity verbs strongly keep the tense equivalence and then achievement and accomplishment verbs follow. The tense equivalence in state verbs is relatively weak. Second, the machine translation keeps the tense equivalence between source and target texts, but students seem to use several tenses: the present, the progressive, the future, and the past. With regard to abstract nouns, adjectives, adverbs, adverb phrases, the machine produces more monotonous translations than students.
참고문헌 (13)
- 목종균, "점진성 동사의 한계성", 일본학보, (110), pp.155~172 (2017), 한국일본학회
- 박기성, "한국어 진행형표지 ‘-고 있다’와 어휘상과의 상호작용 연구", 언어학 연구, (41), pp.183~197 (2016), 한국중원언어학회
- 홍기선, "영어와 한국어의 진행상", 언어, 38(4), pp.1049~1092 (2013), 한국언어학회
- Anderson, R. W., "Discourse Motivations for Some Cognitive Acquisition Principles", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, pp.133~156 (1994)
- Garey, H. B., "Verbal Aspect in French", Language, 33(2), pp.91~110 (1957)
- Kenny, A., "Action, Emotion and Will" (1963), Routledge
- Kim, Shin-Hye., "The Acquisition of Tense and Aspect by Korean and Chinese Learners of English", pp.1999
- Lee, E. H., "Stative Progressives in Korean and English", Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp.695~717 (2006)
- Mourelators, A. P. D., "Events, processes, and states", Linguistic Philosophy, 2, pp.415~434 (1978)
- Park, Y. R., "On Progressives", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 20(4), pp.111~142 (1995)
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Smith, C. S., "A Theory of Aspectual Choice", Language, 59(3), pp.497~501 (1983)
- Vendler, Z., "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press