히라쓰카 라이초의 모성주의와 전쟁과 평화의 정치학
Hiratsuka Raicho's Maternalism and the Politics of War and Peace
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Hiratsuka Raicho, the well-known new woman in modern Japan, constructed maternalism through ‘the debate on maternity protection’ in the Daisho period. Since then her maternalism asserting the maternity of nation-state was practiced to declare progressive women's movement in 1920s. But her maternalism was altered to set up a cooperation in the discourse of militaristic mother, in other words, Chong Hoo Buin that was made for the mobilization of women under the war system in the late 1930s. Ironically, Hiratsuka's maternalism was devoted to place mothers at the forefront of women's peace movement by the ‘Japanese Mothers’ Meeting' in the postwar period. what was difference in the meaning of maternity, war and peace in the frame of her maternalism between prewar and postwar? what was difference in the politics of war and peace of her maternalism between prewar and postwar? In exploring these questions, this study attempted to explore how the cognitive frame of maternity, war and peace had influence on Asia's security and the lives of Asian women. For this study, the qualitative content analysis of research method was used. The result of research was as follows. First, Hiratsuka's maternalism which contained ethnocentric maternalism gave maternity the instinctive power for peace in the 1910s to 1960s. As a result, her maternalism awarded mothers the apostle for Japanese women's peace movement in the postwar period. Second, the Japanese mothers' peace movement of ‘Japanese Mothers’ Meeting' highlighted the victims of war upon mothers. Consequently the Japanese mothers’ peace movement of ‘Japanese Mothers’ Meeting' coverd up the ravages of Asian women who were mistreated during the wars. Third, the spectrum of the concept of peace in the frame of Hiratsuka's maternalism embraced various ideological stripes of pacifism from absence of war at any price to just war for peace. Therefore her maternalism could not acknowledge the Japanese invasion of Asia and Japanese responsibility for the wars of aggression into Asia.
Abstract
Hiratsuka Raicho, the well-known new woman in modern Japan, constructed maternalism through ‘the debate on maternity protection’ in the Daisho period. Since then her maternalism asserting the maternity of nation-state was practiced to declare progressive women's movement in 1920s. But her maternalism was altered to set up a cooperation in the discourse of militaristic mother, in other words, Chong Hoo Buin that was made for the mobilization of women under the war system in the late 1930s. Ironically, Hiratsuka's maternalism was devoted to place mothers at the forefront of women's peace movement by the ‘Japanese Mothers’ Meeting' in the postwar period. what was difference in the meaning of maternity, war and peace in the frame of her maternalism between prewar and postwar? what was difference in the politics of war and peace of her maternalism between prewar and postwar? In exploring these questions, this study attempted to explore how the cognitive frame of maternity, war and peace had influence on Asia's security and the lives of Asian women. For this study, the qualitative content analysis of research method was used. The result of research was as follows. First, Hiratsuka's maternalism which contained ethnocentric maternalism gave maternity the instinctive power for peace in the 1910s to 1960s. As a result, her maternalism awarded mothers the apostle for Japanese women's peace movement in the postwar period. Second, the Japanese mothers' peace movement of ‘Japanese Mothers’ Meeting' highlighted the victims of war upon mothers. Consequently the Japanese mothers’ peace movement of ‘Japanese Mothers’ Meeting' coverd up the ravages of Asian women who were mistreated during the wars. Third, the spectrum of the concept of peace in the frame of Hiratsuka's maternalism embraced various ideological stripes of pacifism from absence of war at any price to just war for peace. Therefore her maternalism could not acknowledge the Japanese invasion of Asia and Japanese responsibility for the wars of aggression into Asia.
참고문헌 (28)
- 市川房枝, "日本婦人問題資料集成 第2卷", pp.1~888 (1977), ドメス出版
- 大越愛子, "近代日本のジェンダー : 現代日本の思想的課題を問う", pp.1~203 (1997), 三一書店
- 大越愛子, "フェミニズムと國家暴力 : トランスナショナルな地平を拓く", pp.1~302 (2004), 世界書院
- 上野千鶴子, "ナショナリズムとジェンダ-", pp.2~360 (2012), 岩波書店
- 鈴木裕子, "女性史を拓く 2: 翼賛と抵抗-今、女の社会参加の方向を問う(国立市公民館女性問題講座「歴史」)", pp.1~248 (1989), 未來社
- 鈴木裕子, "女性史を拓く 3 : 女と<戰後50年>", pp.1~188 (1995), 未來史
- 鈴木裕子, "フェミニズムと戰爭: 婦人運動家の戰爭協力", pp.1~229 (1997), マルジュ社
- 鈴木裕子, "日本女性運動資料集成 第10卷", pp.1~750 (1995), 不二出版
- 鈴木裕子, "日本女性運動資料集成 別卷", pp.1~403 (1998), 不二 出版
- 日本母親大會10年史編纂委員會, "母親運動10年のあゆみ", pp.1~418 (1966), 日本母親大會連絡會
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集 1", pp.1~430 (1983), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集 2", pp.1~423 (1983), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集 3", pp.1~382 (1983), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集 4", pp.1~395 (1983), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集 5", pp.1~423 (1984), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集 6", pp.1~436 (1984), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集 7", pp.1~473 (1984), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編集委員會編, "平塚らいてう著作集補(写真・書簡・年譜・著作目録)", pp.1~195 (1984), 大月書店
- 米田佐代子, "平塚らいてうの「戦争責任」論序説: 戦争参加と女性(特集)", 歷史評論, 552통권 : 552, pp.46~56 (1996), 歴史科学協議会
- 권혁태, "두 번째 ‘전후’(1960-1970년대 아시아와 마주친 일본)", pp.1~352 (2017), 한울 아카데미
- 남기정, "일본의 전후 평화주의-원류와 전개, 그리고 현재", 역사비평, (106), pp.94~134 (2014), 역사문제연구소
- 이현정, "일본 반전평화운동의 사상적 토양", 고려대 평화연구논집, 26(1), pp.209~243 (2018), 고려대 평화와 민주주의연구소
- 황익구, "한국 전쟁에 대한 일본 여성의 반응과 반전‧평화운동의 양상", 일본사상, (32), pp.281~307 (2017), 한국일본사상사학회
- 후지메 유키, "성의 역사학", pp.1~475 (2004), 삼인
- 히토쓰바시대학 한국학연구센터, "기억과 인식: 일본은 아시아 태평양 전쟁을 어떻게 기억하고 인식하는가?", pp.1~416 (2020), 어문학사
- Ellen Key, "War, Peace and the Future", pp.1~271 (1916), G.P. Putman's Sons
- Sara Ruddick, "Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of peace", pp.1~320 (1995), Beacon Press
- "日本母親大會"[URL]
