1930년대 후반 히라쓰카 라이초의 모성주의 변용에 관한 연구
Studies on the Transformation of Hiratsuka Raicho's Maternalism in the Late 1930s
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Hiratsuka Raicho, the well-known new woman in modern Japan, constructed maternalism through ‘the debate on maternity protection’ in the Daisho period. Since then Hiratsuka's maternalism asserting rights of women and maternity protection toward the state was practiced. But the Second Sino-Japanese War lasted in the late 1930s, the contents and assertions of Hiratsuka's maternalism had been altered. Particularly, this research was to investigate the transformation of Hiratsuka's maternalism during the Second Sino-Japanese War of the late 1930s. Because her maternalism of the late 1930s had important meanings which were distinguished from Hiratsuka's maternalism composed through ‘the debate on maternity protection’ in Daisho period. As a result of research, Hiratsuka's maternalism was fused into the discourse of militaristic mother, that is Chong Hoo Buin(hereafter women in the rear guard). Therefore the contents and assertions of Hiratsuka's maternalism had been transformed. First, her maternalism was very emphatic on mothering education of women in the rear guard to beautify Japanese invasion of China. Second, Hiratsuka who emphasized the state's guarantee of maternity proposed many plans for the maternity protection of women in the rear guard. Especially Hiratsuka highlighted the tragic calamity that wars and venereal diseases inflicted upon maternity, family, children and ethic Japanese people. This also led Hiratsuka to demand the programs of venereal disease prevention for Japanese mothers. Besides, as men joined the army in the Second Sino-Japanese War of the late 1930s more and more women entered the workforce in this period. Hiratsuka stressed the maternity protection along with special protection of women's labor. Especially Hiratsuka's maternalism connected this maternity protection with national hygienics which was emphasized by the militarism of the emperor system of Japan in this period. Third, Hiratsuka's maternalism which declared progressive women's movement in 1920 was altered to set up an alliance with the activities of militaristic state-inspired women's organizations that were made for the mobilization of women under the war system in the late 1930s.
Abstract
Hiratsuka Raicho, the well-known new woman in modern Japan, constructed maternalism through ‘the debate on maternity protection’ in the Daisho period. Since then Hiratsuka's maternalism asserting rights of women and maternity protection toward the state was practiced. But the Second Sino-Japanese War lasted in the late 1930s, the contents and assertions of Hiratsuka's maternalism had been altered. Particularly, this research was to investigate the transformation of Hiratsuka's maternalism during the Second Sino-Japanese War of the late 1930s. Because her maternalism of the late 1930s had important meanings which were distinguished from Hiratsuka's maternalism composed through ‘the debate on maternity protection’ in Daisho period. As a result of research, Hiratsuka's maternalism was fused into the discourse of militaristic mother, that is Chong Hoo Buin(hereafter women in the rear guard). Therefore the contents and assertions of Hiratsuka's maternalism had been transformed. First, her maternalism was very emphatic on mothering education of women in the rear guard to beautify Japanese invasion of China. Second, Hiratsuka who emphasized the state's guarantee of maternity proposed many plans for the maternity protection of women in the rear guard. Especially Hiratsuka highlighted the tragic calamity that wars and venereal diseases inflicted upon maternity, family, children and ethic Japanese people. This also led Hiratsuka to demand the programs of venereal disease prevention for Japanese mothers. Besides, as men joined the army in the Second Sino-Japanese War of the late 1930s more and more women entered the workforce in this period. Hiratsuka stressed the maternity protection along with special protection of women's labor. Especially Hiratsuka's maternalism connected this maternity protection with national hygienics which was emphasized by the militarism of the emperor system of Japan in this period. Third, Hiratsuka's maternalism which declared progressive women's movement in 1920 was altered to set up an alliance with the activities of militaristic state-inspired women's organizations that were made for the mobilization of women under the war system in the late 1930s.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김선민, "近代 日本의 여성해방운동과 ‘母性’ -‘母性’의 발견과 파괴를 중심으로-", 일어일문학, (63), pp.247~260 (2014), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
- 문소정, "한국과 일본 여성의 근대적 자각에 관한 비교연구 -여권선언문을 중심으로-", 동북아 문화연구, 1(53), pp.497~515 (2017), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 문소정, "히라츠카 라이초(平塚らいてう)의 섹슈얼리티 담론과 일본군 ‘위안부’ 문제", 동북아 문화연구, 1(61), pp.345~360 (2019), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 문소정, "아시아 여성에 대한 히라쓰카 라이초의 모성주의 영향에 관한 연구", 동북아 문화연구, 1(73), pp.351~367 (2022), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 朴娥凜, "히라츠카 라이초우(平塚らいてう)의 國家 인식 : 母性保護 論爭을 중심으로", 서울대 동양사학과 논집, 33, pp.189~220 (2009), 서울대 동양사학과
- 박유미, "‘군국의 어머니’담론 연구", 일본문화연구, (45), pp.153~172 (2013), 동아시아일본학회[DOI]
- 서동주, "제국일본의 생명정치와 ‘황도주의’ 우생학 - 고야 요시오의 ‘민족생물학’을 중심으로 -", 日本學(일본학), 52, pp.59~88 (2020), 일본학연구소
- 오고시 아이코, "근대 일본의 젠더이데올로기", pp.1~237 (2009), 소명출판
- 이게타 미도리, "역사인식 논쟁", pp.180~195 (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 이은경, "일본사의 변혁기를 본다", pp.279~325 (2011), 지식산업사
- 이은경, "다이쇼기 일본 여성운동의 조직화와 노선 갈등 ― 『女性同盟』을 통해 보는 <新婦人協會>(1919～1922)의 역사와 의의 ―", 동양사학연구, (116), pp.289~338 (2011), 동양사학회
- 이은경, "모성・참정권・전쟁 그리고 국가 - 근대 일본 여성운동의 통시적 고찰", 비교문화연구, 43, pp.79~113 (2016), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 진필수, "일제 총동원체제의 기원과 특징에 대한 재검토: 전쟁인류학의 모색", 비교문화연구, 22(2), pp.425~473 (2016), 비교문화연구소
- 上野千鶴子, ""国民国家とジェンダー(女性の国民化)をめぐって"", 現代思想, 24(12), pp.8~45 (1996), 青土社
- 上野千鶴子, "ナショナリズムとジェンダ-", pp.2~360 (2012), 岩波書店
- 広瀬玲子, "平塚らいてうの思想形成 : ―エレン・ケイ思想の受容をめぐる本間久雄との違い―", ジェンダー史学, 2, pp.35~48 (2006), ジェンダー史学會
- 岡田英己子, "平塚らいてうの母性主義フェミニズムと優生思想-(性と生殖の国家管理)断種法要求はいつ加筆されたのか", 人文学報, (361), pp.23~97 (2005), 首都大学東京都市教養学部人文․社会系, 東京都立大学人文学部
- 大越愛子, "近代日本のジェンダー : 現代日本の思想的課題を問う", pp.1~203 (1997), 三一書店
- 奧村直史, "平塚らいてうと15年戰爭 : 1931-1941年を中心に", 平塚らいてう會紀要, (6), pp.6~23 (2013), 平塚らいてう會
- 金子 幸子, "エレン․ケイ女性論の受容 : 平塚らいてうを中心に", 平塚らいてう會紀要, (7), pp.5~14 (2014), 平塚らいてう會
- Christine Levy, "母性の歴史と現状を巡って平塚らいてうの再評価を考える(特集"青鞜"(創刊100周年․らいてう生誕125周年百年の女たちのメッセージを聴く)", 平塚らいてうの会紀要, (4), pp.40~58 (2011), 平塚らいてうの会
- 鈴木裕子, "フェミニズムと戰爭 : 婦人運動家の戰爭協力", pp.1~229 (1986), マルジュ社
- 鈴木裕子, "女性史を拓く1:母と女,平塚雷鳥․市川房枝を軸に(国立市公民館女性問題講座｢歴史｣)", pp.1~215 (1989), 未來社
- 鈴木裕子, "女性史を拓く 2: 翼賛と抵抗-今、女の社会参加の方向を問う(国立市公民館女性問題 講座 ｢歴史｣", pp.1~248 (1989), 未來社
- "女性史を拓く3 : 女と戦後50年, (国立市公民館女性問題講座｢歴史｣)", pp.1~188 (1995), 未來社
- 鈴木裕子, "日本女性運動資料集成 第10卷 戰爭", pp.1~750 (1995), 不二出版
- 鈴木裕子, "日本女性運動資料集成別券索引(人名․團體名․執筆者名索引)", pp.1~152 (1998), 不二出版
- 米田佐代子, "平塚らいてうの｢戦争責任｣論序説: 戦争参加と女性(特集)", 歷史評論, 552통권 : 552, pp.46~56 (1996), 歴史科学協議会
- 平塚らいてう著作集編輯委員會, "平塚らいてう著作集 第2卷 母性の主張について", pp.1~423 (1983), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編輯委員會, "平塚らいてう著作集 第3卷 社會改造に對する婦人の使命", pp.1~382 (1983), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編輯委員會, "平塚らいてう著作集 第5卷 婦人戰線に參加して", pp.1~423 (1984), 大月書店
- 平塚らいてう著作集編輯委員會, "平塚らいてう著作集 第6卷 娘に母の遺産を語る", pp.1~436 (1984), 大月書店
- Yoko, Hayashi, "Raicho Hiratsuka and Ellen Key : Comparative Studies of the connection between eugenics and feminism", International Conference:New Women, 2006, ~