周作人의 ‘雜學’과 지식의 통섭
Zhou zuoren's ZaXue & Consilience of Knowledge
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the 20th century, the new intellectuals in China had a critical mind in common, which was how to get out of the traditional academic thoughts and secure the self‐ruling academic independence liberated from ethics. Zhou zuoren also sought to make up a new academic system through securing its independence, pointing out how detrimental the traditional Chinese academy was, which had been subjected to ethics. On the other hand, however, he didn’t deny the connection itself between academy and ethics. He thought that academy which studies human beings and objects could hardly be separated from ethics and must not be separated from ethics in that the latter was a total form of what human beings accumulated as human culture passed through a long time. But he believed that what was problematic was that academy must not be completely subjected to ethics as it had been or be treated as a byproduct for ethics, and that academy should be able to make contributions to creating human beings’ new future‐oriented ethics in the end through mutual communications and exchanges, while sustaining its original independence. In order to achieve his idea, Zhou zuoren tried to practice a series of new academies which he himself called ‘Za Xue(雜學)’. What he called sundry learning had the relative meaning compared with so‐called ‘authentic academy’ or ‘mainstream academy’, through which he endeavored to pull himself out of the frame of mainstream academy previously subjected to ethics, draw up new academic areas based on individuals’ independent consciousness and knowledge, and lay the foundations for a new human academy through communications and exchanges among each academic area. He tried to ultimately examine the root of China’s national character by exploring the Chinese people’s daily lives, customs, and folk art through the in‐depth study of anthropology and folklore, and establish new viewpoints towards children and juvenile literature on the basis of scientific reason while criticizing universal recognition of children in traditional societies by studying mythology and fairly tales. In addition, he intended to go beyond the limits of human beings‐oriented thoughts by studying Western sex psychology and biology, and think and form the relationship itself between human beings and objects in a fresh way through scientifically understanding human beings and observing objects themselves. He made efforts to introduce to China Japanese culture through the research of Japan and, in particular, the arts and aesthetics in daily living which was peculiar to Japan as he was greatly interested in them. Moreover, he read China’s idea history from a new point through the research of writing methods during the Ching Dynasty and tried to regard it as a foundation for help past and present communicate with each other through having a dialogue with the present and for historic recognition. On top of that, he made great achievements in translating foreign literature and ancient Greek mythology and had interests in studying Buddhist scriptures and medical history and went on with in‐depth researches.
Abstract
After the 20th century, the new intellectuals in China had a critical mind in common, which was how to get out of the traditional academic thoughts and secure the self‐ruling academic independence liberated from ethics. Zhou zuoren also sought to make up a new academic system through securing its independence, pointing out how detrimental the traditional Chinese academy was, which had been subjected to ethics. On the other hand, however, he didn’t deny the connection itself between academy and ethics. He thought that academy which studies human beings and objects could hardly be separated from ethics and must not be separated from ethics in that the latter was a total form of what human beings accumulated as human culture passed through a long time. But he believed that what was problematic was that academy must not be completely subjected to ethics as it had been or be treated as a byproduct for ethics, and that academy should be able to make contributions to creating human beings’ new future‐oriented ethics in the end through mutual communications and exchanges, while sustaining its original independence. In order to achieve his idea, Zhou zuoren tried to practice a series of new academies which he himself called ‘Za Xue(雜學)’. What he called sundry learning had the relative meaning compared with so‐called ‘authentic academy’ or ‘mainstream academy’, through which he endeavored to pull himself out of the frame of mainstream academy previously subjected to ethics, draw up new academic areas based on individuals’ independent consciousness and knowledge, and lay the foundations for a new human academy through communications and exchanges among each academic area. He tried to ultimately examine the root of China’s national character by exploring the Chinese people’s daily lives, customs, and folk art through the in‐depth study of anthropology and folklore, and establish new viewpoints towards children and juvenile literature on the basis of scientific reason while criticizing universal recognition of children in traditional societies by studying mythology and fairly tales. In addition, he intended to go beyond the limits of human beings‐oriented thoughts by studying Western sex psychology and biology, and think and form the relationship itself between human beings and objects in a fresh way through scientifically understanding human beings and observing objects themselves. He made efforts to introduce to China Japanese culture through the research of Japan and, in particular, the arts and aesthetics in daily living which was peculiar to Japan as he was greatly interested in them. Moreover, he read China’s idea history from a new point through the research of writing methods during the Ching Dynasty and tried to regard it as a foundation for help past and present communicate with each other through having a dialogue with the present and for historic recognition. On top of that, he made great achievements in translating foreign literature and ancient Greek mythology and had interests in studying Buddhist scriptures and medical history and went on with in‐depth researches.
참고문헌 (29)
- 周作人, "周作人自編文集" (2002), 河北教育出版社
- 周作人, "周作人文類編" (1998), 鍾叔河編,湖南文藝出版社
- 周作人, "中國新文學的源流" (1995), 華東師範大學出版社
- 錢理群, "周作人論" (1991), 上海人民出版社
- 錢理群, "周作人傳" (2005), 北京十月文藝出版社
- 錢理群, "說話周氏兄弟-北大講演錄" (1998), 山東畫報出版社
- 舒蕪, "周作人的是非功過" (2000), 遼寧教育出版社
- 王友貴, "翻譯家周作人" (2001), 四川文藝出版社
- 劉緖源, "解讀周作人" (2009), 秀威資訊科技
- 陳平原, "中國現代學術之建立" (1998), 北京大學出版社
- 羅志田, "權勢轉移: 近代中國的思想社會與學術" (1999), 湖北人民出版社
- 木山英, "北京苦住雜記-日中戰爭時代的周作人" (2008), 生活․讀書․新知三聯書店
- 木山英, "文學複古與文學革命" (2004), 北京大學出版社
- 張輝, "審美現代性批判" (1999), 北京大學出版社
- 黃開發, "人在旅途-周作人思想和文體" (1999), 人民文學出版社
- 쑨위, "루쉰과 저우쭈어런" (2005), 소명출판
- 미조구치 유조, "시대로 읽는 중국사상 명강의" (2004), 소나무
- 미조구치 유조, "중국 전근대사상의 굴절과 전개" (2007), 동과서
- 劉軍, "周作人與日本文學翻譯", 魯迅硏究月刊, (6) (2005)
- 蔣保, "周作人之古希臘文化觀", 歷史問題硏究, (5)
- 陳永超, "周作人․人類學․希臘神話", 魯迅硏究月刊, (6) (2002)
- 趙京華, "周作人與柳田國男", 魯迅硏硏究月刊, (9) (2002)
- 符杰祥, "知識與道德的糾葛-周作人學術思想及其硏究的方法論問題", 東嶽論叢, 30(5) (2009)
- "癡人譯古爲哪般―論周作人的古希臘世界"[URL]
- "周作人的名物硏究-周作人與晚清民初學"[URL]
- 김미정, "周作人과 日本", 中國文學, 36 (2001), 한국중국어문학회
- 홍윤희, "周作人의 민속학 연구와 ‘신화’", 중국어문학논집, (33), pp.433~455 (2005), 중국어문학연구회
- 홍준형, "산문 전통과 1930년대 학자산문 ― 周作人, 兪平伯, 廢名의 글쓰기를 중심으로", 중국현대문학, (48), pp.35~60 (2009), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 홍준형, "文學想象與現代散文話語的建立(1925-1935)(上)", 中國現代文學硏究叢刊, (1) (2004), 中國現代文學硏究會
