Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purposes of this study were to measure the palatal soft tissue thickness at popular placement sites of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and evaluate the age, gender, and positional differences in this parameter. Methods: The study sample consisted of 23 children (10 boys and 13 girls; mean age, 10.87 ± 1.24 years; range, 6.7 to 12.6 years) and 27 adults (14 men and 13 women; mean age, 21.35 ± 1.14 years; range, 20.0 to 23.8 years). Nine mediolateral and nine anteroposterior intersecting reference lines were drawn on CBCT scans of the 50 subjects, and the resultant measurement areas were designated according to their mediolateral (i.e., lateral, medial, and sutural) and anteroposterior (i.e., anterior, middle, and posterior) positions. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to analyze intragroup and intergroup differences. Results: No significant age and gender differences were found (p = 0.309 and 0.124, respectively). Further, no significant anteroposterior change was observed (p = 0.350). However, the lateral area presented the thickest soft tissue whereas the sutural area had the thinnest soft tissue (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Clinical selection of the placement sites of TADs should be guided by knowledge of the positional variations in the palatal soft tissue thickness in addition to other contributing factors of TAD stability.
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this study were to measure the palatal soft tissue thickness at popular placement sites of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and evaluate the age, gender, and positional differences in this parameter. Methods: The study sample consisted of 23 children (10 boys and 13 girls; mean age, 10.87 ± 1.24 years; range, 6.7 to 12.6 years) and 27 adults (14 men and 13 women; mean age, 21.35 ± 1.14 years; range, 20.0 to 23.8 years). Nine mediolateral and nine anteroposterior intersecting reference lines were drawn on CBCT scans of the 50 subjects, and the resultant measurement areas were designated according to their mediolateral (i.e., lateral, medial, and sutural) and anteroposterior (i.e., anterior, middle, and posterior) positions. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to analyze intragroup and intergroup differences. Results: No significant age and gender differences were found (p = 0.309 and 0.124, respectively). Further, no significant anteroposterior change was observed (p = 0.350). However, the lateral area presented the thickest soft tissue whereas the sutural area had the thinnest soft tissue (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Clinical selection of the placement sites of TADs should be guided by knowledge of the positional variations in the palatal soft tissue thickness in addition to other contributing factors of TAD stability.
참고문헌 (21)
- Kinzinger GS, "Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.558~571 (2008)
- Papadopoulos MA, "The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 103, pp.e6~e15 (2007)
- Hoste S, "Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review", Aust Orthod J, 24, pp.140~148 (2008)
- Reynders R, "Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.564~ (2009)
- Chen YJ, "A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.768~775 (2007)
- Kyung SH, "Distalization of the entire maxillary arch in an adult", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135(4 Suppl), pp.S123~S132 (2009)
- Kook YA, "A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalization", J Clin Orthod, 44, pp.719~730 (2010)
- Sandler J, "Palatal implants are a good alternative to headgear: a randomized trial", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.51~57 (2008)
- Greenberg J, "Transgingival probing as a potential estimator of alveolar bone level", J Periodontol, 47, pp.514~517 (1976)
- Wara-aswapati N, "Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1407~1412 (2001)
- Eger T, "Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness: subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features", J Clin Periodontol, 23, pp.839~845 (1996)
- Müller HP, "Thickness of masticatory mucosa", J Clin Periodontol, 27, pp.431~436 (2000)
- Song JE, "Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: The use of computerized tomography", Journal Of Periodontology, 79(3), pp.406~412 (2008), AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY
- Ueno D, "Accuracy of oral mucosal thickness measurements using spiral computed tomography", J Periodontol, 82, pp.829~836 (2011)
- Januário AL, "Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit", J Esthet Restor Dent, 20, pp.366~373 (2008)
- Barriviera M, "A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography", J Clin Periodontol, 36, pp.564~568 (2009)
- Fu JH, "Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology", J Periodontol, 81, pp.569~574 (2010)
- Kim HJ, "Softtissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.177~182 (2006)
- Moon SH, "Palatal bone density in adult subjects: implications for mini-implant placement", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.137~144 (2010)
- Guerrero ME, "State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement", Clin Oral Investig, 10, pp.1~7 (2006)
- Cha BK, "Soft tissue thickness for placement of an orthodontic miniscrew using an ultrasonic device", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.403~408 (2008)