Sex-, growth pattern-, and growth status-related variability in maxillary and mandibular buccal cortical thickness and density
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to quantitatively analyze the bone parameters (thickness and density) at four different interdental areas from the distal region of the canine to the mesial region of the second molar in the maxilla and the mandible. The secondary aim was to compare and contrast the bone parameters at these specific locations in terms of sex, growth status, and facial type. Methods: This retrospective cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study reviewed 290 CBCT images of patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Cortical bone thickness in millimeters (mm) and density in pixel intensity value were measured for the regions (1) between the canine and first premolar, (2) between the first and second premolars, (3) between the second premolar and first molar, and (4) between the first and second molars. At each location, the bone thickness and density were measured at distances of 2, 6, and 10 mm from the alveolar crest. Results: The sex comparison (male vs. female) in cortical bone thickness showed no significant difference (p > 0.001). The bone density in growing subjects was significantly (p < 0.001) lower than that in non-growing subjects for most locations. There was no significant difference (p > 0.001) in bone parameters in relation to facial pattern in the maxilla and mandible for most sites. Conclusions: There was no significant sex-related difference in cortical bone thickness. The buccal cortical bone density was higher in females than in males. Bone parameters were similar for subjects with hyperdivergent, hypodivergent, and normodivergent facial patterns. [Korean J Orthod 2020;50(2):108-119]
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to quantitatively analyze the bone parameters (thickness and density) at four different interdental areas from the distal region of the canine to the mesial region of the second molar in the maxilla and the mandible. The secondary aim was to compare and contrast the bone parameters at these specific locations in terms of sex, growth status, and facial type. Methods: This retrospective cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study reviewed 290 CBCT images of patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Cortical bone thickness in millimeters (mm) and density in pixel intensity value were measured for the regions (1) between the canine and first premolar, (2) between the first and second premolars, (3) between the second premolar and first molar, and (4) between the first and second molars. At each location, the bone thickness and density were measured at distances of 2, 6, and 10 mm from the alveolar crest. Results: The sex comparison (male vs. female) in cortical bone thickness showed no significant difference (p > 0.001). The bone density in growing subjects was significantly (p < 0.001) lower than that in non-growing subjects for most locations. There was no significant difference (p > 0.001) in bone parameters in relation to facial pattern in the maxilla and mandible for most sites. Conclusions: There was no significant sex-related difference in cortical bone thickness. The buccal cortical bone density was higher in females than in males. Bone parameters were similar for subjects with hyperdivergent, hypodivergent, and normodivergent facial patterns. [Korean J Orthod 2020;50(2):108-119]
참고문헌 (27)
- Fortini A, "Clinical applications and efficacy of miniscrews for extra-dental anchorage", Orthod, 1, pp.87~98 (2004)
- Papadopoulos MA, "The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics : a comprehensive review", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 103, pp.e6~e15 (2007)
- Alharbi F, "Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics : systematic review and metaanalysis", Eur J Orthod, 40, pp.519~530 (2018)
- Papageorgiou SN, "Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants : a meta-analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.577~595 (2012)
- Kravitz ND, "Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131(4 Suppl), pp.S43~S51 (2007)
- Melsen B, "Miniscrew implants : the Aarhus anchorage system", Semin Orthod, 11, pp.24~31 (2005)
- Horn AJ, "Facial height index", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 102, pp.180~186 (1992)
- Steiner CC, "Cephalometrics in clinical practice", Angle Orthod, 29, pp.8~29 (1959)
- McNamara JA Jr, "A method of cephalometric evaluation", Am J Orthod, 86, pp.449~469 (1984)
- Tseng YC, "Effects of gripping volume in the mechanical strengths of orthodontic mini-implant", Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 33, pp.578~583 (2017)
- Motoyoshi M, "Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.109~114 (2006)
- Baumgaertel S, "Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.230~235 (2009)
- Marquezan M, "Does cortical thickness influence the primary stability of miniscrews? : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.1093~1103 (2014)
- Motoyoshi M, "Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.779~784 (2007)
- Cha JY, "Miniscrew stability evaluated with computerized tomography scanning", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.73~79 (2010)
- Iijima M, "Effect of the quantity and quality of cortical bone on the failure force of a miniscrew implant", Eur J Orthod, 35, pp.583~589 (2013)
- Holm L, "An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.1022~1028 (2012)
- Farnsworth D, "Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.495~503 (2011)
- Chun YS, "Bone density at interradicular sites : implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement", Orthod Craniofac Res, 12, pp.25~32 (2009)
- Ono A, "Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 37, pp.334~340 (2008)
- Cassetta M, "Evaluation of alveolar cortical bone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement", J Clin Exp Dent, 5, pp.e245~e252 (2013)
- Fadhil RM, "Assessment of cortical bone density for orthodontic implants placement : computerized tomography study", Al-Rafidain Dent J, 15, pp.393~398 (2015)
- Hiasa K, "Preoperative computed tomographyderived bone densities in hounsfield units at implant sites acquired primary stability", ISRN Dent, 2011, pp.678729~ (2011)
- Sathapana S, "Age-related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement", Aust Dent J, 58, pp.67~74 (2013)
- Sadek MM, "Three-dimensional mapping of cortical bone thickness in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions", Prog Orthod, 17, pp.32~ (2016)
- Horner KA, "Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.170~178 (2012)
- Ozdemir F, "Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, pp.190~196 (2013)