Pattern of microimplant displacement during maxillary skeletal expander treatment: A cone-beam computed tomography study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To analyze the microimplant (MI) displacement pattern on treatment with a maxillary skeletal expander (MSE) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Thirty-nine participants (12 males and 27 females; mean age, 18.2 ± 4.2 years) were treated successfully with the MSE II appliance. Their pre- and post-expansion CBCT data were superimposed. The pre- and post-expansion anterior and posterior inter-MI angles, neck and apical inter-MI distance, plate angle, palatal bone thickness at the MI positions, and suture opening at the MI positions were measured and compared. Results: The jackscrew plate was slightly bent in both anterior and posterior areas. There was no significant difference in the extent of suture opening between the anterior and posterior MIs (P > 0.05). The posterior MI to hemiplate line was greater than that anteriorly (P < 0.05). The apical distance between the posterior MIs was greater than that anteriorly (P < 0.05). The palatal thickness at the anterior MIs was significantly greater than that posteriorly (P > 0.01). Conclusions: In the coronal plane, the angulation between the anterior MIs in relation to the jackscrew plate was greater than that between the posterior MIs owing to the differential palatal bone thickness.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the microimplant (MI) displacement pattern on treatment with a maxillary skeletal expander (MSE) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Thirty-nine participants (12 males and 27 females; mean age, 18.2 ± 4.2 years) were treated successfully with the MSE II appliance. Their pre- and post-expansion CBCT data were superimposed. The pre- and post-expansion anterior and posterior inter-MI angles, neck and apical inter-MI distance, plate angle, palatal bone thickness at the MI positions, and suture opening at the MI positions were measured and compared. Results: The jackscrew plate was slightly bent in both anterior and posterior areas. There was no significant difference in the extent of suture opening between the anterior and posterior MIs (P > 0.05). The posterior MI to hemiplate line was greater than that anteriorly (P < 0.05). The apical distance between the posterior MIs was greater than that anteriorly (P < 0.05). The palatal thickness at the anterior MIs was significantly greater than that posteriorly (P > 0.01). Conclusions: In the coronal plane, the angulation between the anterior MIs in relation to the jackscrew plate was greater than that between the posterior MIs owing to the differential palatal bone thickness.
참고문헌 (26)
- Baccetti T, "Treatment timing for rapid maxillary expansion", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.343~350 (2001)
- N. Kilic, "A comparison of dentoalveolar inclination treated by two palatal expanders", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 30(1), pp.67~72 (2007), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- H. Olmez, "Multitomographic evaluation of the dental effects of two different rapid palatal expansion appliances", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 29(4), pp.379~385 (2007), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Kartalian A, "Conebeam computerized tomography evaluation of the maxillary dentoskeletal complex after rapid palatal expansion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.486~492 (2010)[DOI]
- Manuel O. Lagravère, "Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: A randomized clinical trial", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 137(3), pp.304.e1~304.e12 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Chuck Carlson, "Microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance to orthopedically correct transverse maxillary deficiency in an adult", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 149(5), pp.716~728 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Yu-Jin Seo, "Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with asymmetry using a bone-borne rapid maxillary expander", The Angle Orthodontist, 85(2), pp.322~334 (2015), The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)[DOI]
- Alev Yılmaz, "Comparison of short-term effects of mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion appliance with two conventional expansion protocols", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 37(5), pp.556~564 (2015), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Fábio Lourenço ROMANO, "Alveolar defects before and after surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE): a CBCT assessment", Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 27(2) (2022), FapUNIFESP (SciELO)[DOI]
- C. Holberg, "Finite element analysis of mono- and bicortical mini-implant stability", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 36(5), pp.550~556 (2013), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Robert J. Lee, "Effects of monocortical and bicortical mini-implant anchorage on bone-borne palatal expansion using finite element analysis", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 151(5), pp.887~897 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Ney Paredes, "Differential assessment of skeletal, alveolar, and dental components induced by microimplant-supported midfacial skeletal expander (MSE), utilizing novel angular measurements from the fulcrum", Progress in Orthodontics, 21(1) (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Ozge Colak, "Tomographic assessment of palatal suture opening pattern and pterygopalatine suture disarticulation in the axial plane after midfacial skeletal expansion", Progress in Orthodontics, 21(1), pp.21~ (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Daniele Cantarella, "Midfacial changes in the coronal plane induced by microimplant-supported skeletal expander, studied with cone-beam computed tomography images", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 154(3), pp.337~345 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Seong Han, "Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices", The Angle Orthodontist, 82(4), pp.625~631 (2012), The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)[DOI]
- Wilmes B, "The T-Zone: median vs. paramedian insertion of palatal mini-implants", J Clin Orthod, 50, pp.543~551 (2016)
- Manying Wang, "Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Insertion of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Adults and Adolescents", Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 28(6), pp.1468~1471 (2017), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- A. Chatzigianni, "Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels", The European Journal of Orthodontics, 33(4), pp.381~387 (2010), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Matt MacGinnis, "The effects of micro-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the nasomaxillary complex—a finite element method (FEM) analysis", Progress in Orthodontics, 15(1), pp.52~ (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Arash Poorsattar‐Bejeh Mir, "Monocortical versus bicortical hard palate anchorage with the same total available cortical thickness: a finite element study", Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 8(3), pp.e12218~ (2016), Wiley[DOI]
- Luca Lombardo, "Class III malocclusion and bilateral cross-bite in an adult patient treated with miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander and aligners", The Angle Orthodontist, 88(5), pp.649~664 (2018), The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)[DOI]
- Wilmes B, "Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant-and toothborne rapid palatal expansion device : the hybrid hyrax", World J Orthod, 11, pp.323~330 (2010)
- Matheus Melo Pithon, "Mechanical Evaluation of Orthodontic Mini-Implants of Different Lengths", Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 71(3), pp.479~486 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Daniel Paludo Brunetto, "Non-surgical treatment of transverse deficiency in adults using Microimplant-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE)", Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 22(1), pp.110~125 (2017), FapUNIFESP (SciELO)[DOI]
- Daniele Cantarella, "Changes in the midpalatal and pterygopalatine sutures induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with a novel 3D method based on CBCT imaging", Progress in Orthodontics, 18(1), pp.34~ (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Bryan T. Brettin, "Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 134(5), pp.625~635 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]