본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Diagnostic methods for assessing maxillary skeletal and dental transverse deficiencies: A systematic review

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the diagnostic tools available for assessing maxillary transverse deficiencies. Methods: An electronic search of three databases was performed from their date of establishment to April 2015, with manual searching of reference lists of relevant articles. Articles were considered for inclusion if they reported the accuracy or reliability of a diagnostic method or evaluation technique for maxillary transverse dimensions in mixed or permanent dentitions. Risk of bias was assessed in the included articles, using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool-2. Results: Nine articles were selected. The studies were heterogeneous, with moderate to low methodological quality, and all had a high risk of bias. Four suggested that the use of arch width prediction indices with dental cast measurements is unreliable for use in diagnosis. Frontal cephalograms derived from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were reportedly more reliable for assessing intermaxillary transverse discrepancies than posteroanterior cephalograms. Two studies proposed new three-dimensional transverse analyses with CBCT images that were reportedly reliable, but have not been validated for clinical sensitivity or specificity. No studies reported sensitivity, specificity, positive or negative predictive values or likelihood ratios, or ROC curves of the methods for the diagnosis of transverse deficiencies. Conclusions: Current evidence does not enable solid conclusions to be drawn, owing to a lack of reliable high quality diagnostic studies evaluating maxillary transverse deficiencies. CBCT images are reportedly more reliable for diagnosis, but further validation is required to confirm CBCT’s accuracy and diagnostic superiority.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(5):331-342]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the diagnostic tools available for assessing maxillary transverse deficiencies. Methods: An electronic search of three databases was performed from their date of establishment to April 2015, with manual searching of reference lists of relevant articles. Articles were considered for inclusion if they reported the accuracy or reliability of a diagnostic method or evaluation technique for maxillary transverse dimensions in mixed or permanent dentitions. Risk of bias was assessed in the included articles, using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool-2. Results: Nine articles were selected. The studies were heterogeneous, with moderate to low methodological quality, and all had a high risk of bias. Four suggested that the use of arch width prediction indices with dental cast measurements is unreliable for use in diagnosis. Frontal cephalograms derived from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were reportedly more reliable for assessing intermaxillary transverse discrepancies than posteroanterior cephalograms. Two studies proposed new three-dimensional transverse analyses with CBCT images that were reportedly reliable, but have not been validated for clinical sensitivity or specificity. No studies reported sensitivity, specificity, positive or negative predictive values or likelihood ratios, or ROC curves of the methods for the diagnosis of transverse deficiencies. Conclusions: Current evidence does not enable solid conclusions to be drawn, owing to a lack of reliable high quality diagnostic studies evaluating maxillary transverse deficiencies. CBCT images are reportedly more reliable for diagnosis, but further validation is required to confirm CBCT’s accuracy and diagnostic superiority.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(5):331-342]

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Mitchell L, "An introduction to orthodontics" (2001), Oxford University Press
  2. Graber LW, "Orthodontics:Current principles and techniques" (2012), Elsevier Mosby
  3. Timms DJ, "The dawn of rapid maxillary expansion", Angle Orthod, 69, pp.247~250 (1999)
  4. Bishara SE, "Maxillary expansion: clinical implications", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 91, pp.3~14 (1987)
  5. Lagravere MO, "Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.1046~1052 (2005)
  6. Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics" (2007), Mosby Elsevier
  7. Suri L, "Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a literature review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.290~302 (2008)
  8. Betts NJ, "Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 10, pp.75~96 (1995)
  9. Malkoc S, "The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs", Eur J Orthod, 27, pp.315~321 (2005)
  10. Leonardi R, "Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.761~765 (2008)
  11. Major PW, "Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics", Angle Orthod, 64, pp.447~454 (1994)
  12. Nur M, "Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.579~584 (2012)
  13. Palomo JM, "Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics : Indications, insights, and innovations", pp.221~ (2014), John Wiley & Sons Inc
  14. Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement", Open Med, 3, pp.e123~e130 (2009)
  15. O’Connor D, "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions" (2011), The Cochrane Collaboration
  16. Whiting P, "The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews", BMC Med Res Methodol, 3, pp.25~ (2003)
  17. Cheung G, "The validity of transverse intermaxillary analysis by traditional PA cephalometry compared with cone-beam computed tomography", Aust Orthod J, 29, pp.86~95 (2013)
  18. Tai B, "The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice", Aust Orthod J, 30, pp.132~142 (2014)
  19. Dalidjan M, "Prediction of dental arch development: an assessment of Pont's Index in three human populations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107, pp.465~475 (1995)
  20. Lee KM, "Comparison of transverse analysis between posteroanterior cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.715~719 (2014)
  21. Nimkarn Y, "The validity of maxillary expansion indices", Angle Orthod, 65, pp.321~326 (1995)
  22. Rastegar-Lari T, "Dental arch dimensions of adolescent Kuwaitis with untreated ideal occlusion: variation and validity of proposed expansion indexes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.635~644 (2012)
  23. Thu KM, "The maxillary arch and its relationship to cephalometric landmarks of selected malay ethnic group", Malays J Med Sci, 12, pp.29~38 (2005)
  24. Miner RM, "Conebeam computed tomography transverse analysis. Part I: Normative data", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.300~307 (2012)
  25. Podesser B, "Quantitation of transverse maxillary dimensions using computed tomography: a methodological and reproducibility study", Eur J Orthod, 26, pp.209~215 (2004)
  26. Vanarsdall RL Jr, "Transverse dimension and longterm stability", Semin Orthod, 5, pp.171~180 (1999)
  27. de Oliveira MA Jr, "Prediction of transverse maxillary dimension using orthodontic models", J Craniofac Surg, 19, pp.1465~1471 (2008)
  28. Betts NJ, "Normal adult transverse jaw values obtained using standardized posteroanterior cephalometrics", J Dent Res, 73, pp.298~ (1994)
  29. Crosby DR, "Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery", pp.2403~2430 (1992), Saunders
  30. Alvaran N, "Maxillary and mandibular arch widths of Colombians", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.649~656 (2009)
  31. Pont A, "Der zahn-index in der orthodontie", Zeitschrifi fur Zahnärztliche Orthopaedie, 3, pp.306~321 (1909)
  32. Schwarz AM, "Removable orthodontic appliances", pp.64~ (1966), Saunders
  33. Howe RP, "An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension", Am J Orthod, 83, pp.363~373 (1983)
  34. Ricketts RM, "Orthodontic diagnosis and planning" (1982), Rocky Mountain Data Systems
  35. Major PW, "Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification", Angle Orthod, 66, pp.51~60 (1996)
  36. Thurow RC, "Cephalometric methods in research and private practice", Angle Orthod, 21, pp.104~116 (1951)
  37. Lagravère MO, "Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.112~116 (2008)
  38. Hans MG, "Cone beam computed tomography: A link with the past, a promise for the future", Semin Orthod, 17, pp.81~87 (2011)
  39. Lascala CA, "Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom)", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 33, pp.291~294 (2004)
  40. Cardoso JR, "What is gold standard and what is ground truth?", Dental Press J Orthod, 19, pp.27~30 (2014)
  41. Pretty IA, "A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: part 1. Reliability, validity, specificity and sensitivity of diagnostic procedures", J Can Dent Assoc, 70, pp.251~255 (2004)
  42. Streit LM, "CWRU's transverse analysis developing norms", master, pp.2012

관련 논문AI추천

Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion구윤진, 금병탁, 유형석, 이기준, 최성환, 황충주, Birte Melsen대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2017 · 제47권 제3호New prediction equations for the estimation of maxillary mandibular canine and premolar widths from mandibular incisors and mandibular first permanent molar widths: A digital model studyFazal Shahid, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Mohd Fadhli Khamis대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2016 · 제46권 제3호Changes in mandibular transversal arch dimensions after rapid maxillary expansion procedure assessed through cone-beam computed tomographyAsli Baysal, Faruk Izzet Ucar, Ilknur Veli, Murat Eruz, Tancan Uysal, Torun Ozer대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2011 · 제41권 제3호Predictability of maxillary dentoalveolar expansion with clear aligners in patients with mixed dentitionAlessandro Bruni, Andrea Piero Deregibus, Georgios Litsas, Giovanni Cugliari, Simone Parrini, Tommaso Castroflorio, Vittorio Gallo대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2025 · 제55권 제2호Comparison between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusions utilizing cone-beam computed tomography국윤아, Glenn T. Sameshima, Jae Hyun Park, Kyung Eun Suk, Mohamed Bayome, Young-Ok Nam대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2013 · 제43권 제1호Effectiveness of miniscrew assisted rapid palatal expansion using cone beam computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysisAnuwongnukroh Niwat, Khlongwanitchakul Kornkanok, Manopatanakul Somchai, Siddhisaributr Patchaya, Viwattanatipa Nita대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2022 · 제52권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)