본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of comprehensive fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: A systematic review with meta-analysis and methodological overview

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the occlusal outcome and duration of fixed orthodontic therapy from clinical trials in humans with the Objective Grading System (OGS) proposed by the American Board of Orthodontics. Methods: Nine databases were searched up to October 2016 for prospective/retrospective clinical trials assessing the outcomes of orthodontic therapy with fixed appliances. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane guidelines, random-effects meta-analyses of the mean OGS score and treatment duration were performed and 95% con-fidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 34 relevant clinical trials including 6,207 patients (40% male, 60% female; average age, 18.4 years) were identified. The average OGS score after treatment was 27.9 points (95% CI, 25.3–30.6 points), while the average treatment duration was 24.9 months (95% CI, 24.6–25.1 months). There was no significant association between occlusal outcome and treatment duration, while considerable heterogeneity was identified. In addition, orthodontic treatment involving extraction of four premolars appeared to have an important effect on both outcomes and duration of treatment. Finally, only 10 (39%) of the identified studies matched compared groups by initial malocclusion severity, although meta-epidemiological evidence suggested that matching may have significantly influenced their results. Conclusions: The findings from this systematic review suggest that the occlusal outcomes of fixed appliance treatment vary considerably, with no significant association between treatment outcomes and duration. Prospective matched clinical studies that use the OGS tool are needed to compare the effectiveness of orthodontic appliances.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(6):401-413]

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the occlusal outcome and duration of fixed orthodontic therapy from clinical trials in humans with the Objective Grading System (OGS) proposed by the American Board of Orthodontics. Methods: Nine databases were searched up to October 2016 for prospective/retrospective clinical trials assessing the outcomes of orthodontic therapy with fixed appliances. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane guidelines, random-effects meta-analyses of the mean OGS score and treatment duration were performed and 95% con-fidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 34 relevant clinical trials including 6,207 patients (40% male, 60% female; average age, 18.4 years) were identified. The average OGS score after treatment was 27.9 points (95% CI, 25.3–30.6 points), while the average treatment duration was 24.9 months (95% CI, 24.6–25.1 months). There was no significant association between occlusal outcome and treatment duration, while considerable heterogeneity was identified. In addition, orthodontic treatment involving extraction of four premolars appeared to have an important effect on both outcomes and duration of treatment. Finally, only 10 (39%) of the identified studies matched compared groups by initial malocclusion severity, although meta-epidemiological evidence suggested that matching may have significantly influenced their results. Conclusions: The findings from this systematic review suggest that the occlusal outcomes of fixed appliance treatment vary considerably, with no significant association between treatment outcomes and duration. Prospective matched clinical studies that use the OGS tool are needed to compare the effectiveness of orthodontic appliances.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(6):401-413]

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Pandis N, "Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.12.e1~12.e6 (2010)
  2. Pandis N, "Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.e99~e105 (2011)
  3. Papageorgiou SN, "A systematic review and metaanalysis of experimental clinical evidence on initial aligning archwires and archwire sequences", Orthod Craniofac Res, 17, pp.197~215 (2014)
  4. Papageorgiou SN, "Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.350~363 (2014)
  5. Papageorgiou SN, "Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects", Eur J Oral Sci, 124, pp.105~118 (2016)
  6. Casko JS, "Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.589~599 (1998)
  7. Mislik B, "University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction and nonextraction patients: a comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.253~258 (2016)
  8. Pinskaya YB, "Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.533~543 (2004)
  9. Cangialosi TJ, "The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.270~278 (2004)
  10. Dougherty HL, "The orthodontic standard of care", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 99, pp.482~485 (1991)
  11. Vig KWL, "Quality of orthodontic treatment", Semin Orthod, 13, pp.81~87 (2007)
  12. Mavreas D, "Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.386~395 (2008)
  13. Tsichlaki A, "How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.308~318 (2016)
  14. "Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0" (2011)[URL]
  15. Liberati A, "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration", J Clin Epidemiol, 62, pp.e1~e34 (2009)
  16. Downs SH, "The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions", J Epidemiol Community Health, 52, pp.377~384 (1998)
  17. Veroniki AA, "Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in metaanalysis", Res Synth Methods, 7, pp.55~79 (2016)
  18. Papageorgiou SN, "Meta-analysis for orthodontists:Part I--How to choose effect measure and statistical model", J Orthod, 41, pp.317~326 (2014)
  19. Papageorgiou SN, "Meta-analysis for orthodontists:Part II--Is all that glitters gold?", J Orthod, 41, pp.327~336 (2014)
  20. IntHout J, "Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis", BMJ Open, 6, pp.e010247~ (2016)
  21. Ioannidis JP, "Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis", J Eval Clin Pract, 14, pp.951~957 (2008)
  22. Tsichlaki A, "How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.308~318 (2016)
  23. Djeu G, "Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.292~298 (2005)
  24. Viwattanatipa N, "Relationship between discrepancy index and the objective grading system in thai board of orthodontics patients", Orthod Waves, 75, pp.54~63 (2016)
  25. Papageorgiou SN, "Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations", J Clin Epidemiol, 68, pp.1512~1522 (2015)
  26. Papageorgiou SN, "Bias from historical control groups used in orthodontic research:a meta-epidemiological study", Eur J Orthod, 39, pp.98~105 (2017)
  27. Marques LS, "Quality of orthodontic treatment performed by orthodontists and general dentists", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.102~106 (2012)
  28. 홍미희, "Comparison of Treatment Outcome Assessment for Class I Malocclusion Patients: Peer Assessment Rating versus American Board of Orthodontics-Objective Grading System", 대한치의학회 영문학회지, 7(1), pp.6~15 (2014), 대한치의학회
  29. Mihee Hong, "The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(4), pp.199~211 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
  30. Pocock SJ, "Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems", Stat Med, 21, pp.2917~2930 (2002)
  31. Papageorgiou SN, "Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.74~85 (2014)
  32. Hernández AV, "Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements", J Clin Epidemiol, 57, pp.454~460 (2004)
  33. Papageorgiou SN, "Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties", J Dent, 43, pp.1195~1202 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Incisor extrusion with or without molar intrusion for the correction of anterior open bite with clear aligners and comparison of outcomes with fixed appliances incorporating temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review and meta-analysisChidsanu Changsiripun, Phuntin Uengkajornkul, Thanit Charoenrat대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2026 · 제56권 제1호Effects of self-ligating brackets and other factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes: A prospective cohort studyJung Min-Ho대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2021 · 제51권 제6호The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment국윤아, Hong-Gee Kim, Jae-Il Lee, Mihee Hong, Myeng-Ki Kim, Seung-Hak Baek대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2016 · 제46권 제4호A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign®Eliseo Plasencia, Jorge Barcia-Gonzalez, Lidia Galan-Lopez대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2019 · 제49권 제3호Clinical effectiveness of different types of bone-anchored maxillary protraction devices for skeletal Class III malocclusion: Systematic review and network meta-analysisJiangwei Wang, Linkun Zhang, Lu Zhang, Wei Ji, Yingxue Wang, Yingying Yang, Zheng Hong대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2022 · 제52권 제5호교정치료 후 나타나는 재발 경향에 대한 정량적 평가와 영향을 미치는 요소에 대한 연구김태우, 손우성, 정동화, 차경석대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2011 · 제41권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)