Effects of self-ligating brackets and other factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes: A prospective cohort study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of self-ligating brackets (SBs) and other factors that influence orthodontic treatment outcomes. Methods: This two-armed cohort study included consecutively treated patients in a private practice. The patients were asked to choose between SBs and conventional brackets (CBs); if any patient did not have a preference, he or she was randomly allocated to the CB or SB group. All patients were treated using an identical archwire sequence. Evaluated parameters were as follows: treatment duration, number of bracket failures, poor oral hygiene, poor elastic wear, extraction, use of orthodontic mini-implants (OMI), OMI failure, American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Discrepancy Index (DI), arch length discrepancy, and ABO Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (CRE) score. Stepwise regression analysis was performed to generate the equation for prediction of the CRE. Results: The final sample comprised 134 patients with an average age of 22.73 years. The average DI, CRE, and treatment duration were 21.81, 14.25, and 28.63 months, respectively. Analysis of covariance showed a significant difference in CRE between the CB and SB groups after adjusting for the effects of confounding variables. Stepwise regression analysis using four variables, namely extraction, SB use, poor elastic wear, and additional appliance use, could explain only 25.2% of the variance in the CRE. Conclusions: Although the CRE was significantly better for CBs than for SBs, the clinical significance of this result seems to be limited. Extraction, SB use, poor elastic wear, and additional appliance use may have significant effects on treatment outcomes.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of self-ligating brackets (SBs) and other factors that influence orthodontic treatment outcomes. Methods: This two-armed cohort study included consecutively treated patients in a private practice. The patients were asked to choose between SBs and conventional brackets (CBs); if any patient did not have a preference, he or she was randomly allocated to the CB or SB group. All patients were treated using an identical archwire sequence. Evaluated parameters were as follows: treatment duration, number of bracket failures, poor oral hygiene, poor elastic wear, extraction, use of orthodontic mini-implants (OMI), OMI failure, American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Discrepancy Index (DI), arch length discrepancy, and ABO Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (CRE) score. Stepwise regression analysis was performed to generate the equation for prediction of the CRE. Results: The final sample comprised 134 patients with an average age of 22.73 years. The average DI, CRE, and treatment duration were 21.81, 14.25, and 28.63 months, respectively. Analysis of covariance showed a significant difference in CRE between the CB and SB groups after adjusting for the effects of confounding variables. Stepwise regression analysis using four variables, namely extraction, SB use, poor elastic wear, and additional appliance use, could explain only 25.2% of the variance in the CRE. Conclusions: Although the CRE was significantly better for CBs than for SBs, the clinical significance of this result seems to be limited. Extraction, SB use, poor elastic wear, and additional appliance use may have significant effects on treatment outcomes.
참고문헌 (30)
- Casko JS, "American Board of Orthodontics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.589~599 (1998)
- Onyeaso CO, "Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.248~252 (2007)
- Papageorgiou SN, "Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.350~363 (2014)
- Chen SS, "Systematic review of self-ligating brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.726~ (2010)[DOI]
- Bennett JC, "Fundamentals of orthodontic bracket selection : a user guide" (2010), Le Grande Pub
- Spyridon N. Papageorgiou, "Outcomes of comprehensive fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: A systematic review with meta-analysis and methodological overview", 대한치과교정학회지, 47(6), pp.401~413 (2017), 대한치과교정학회
- Beckwith FR, "An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp.439~447 (1999)
- Skidmore KJ, "Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.230~238 (2006)
- Chaison ET, "The quality of treatment in the adult orthodontic patient as judged by orthodontists and measured by the Objective Grading System", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (2011)
- Cansunar HA, "Relationship between pretreatment case complexity and orthodontic clinical outcomes determined by the American Board of Orthodontics criteria", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.974~979 (2014)
- Campbell CL, "Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.822~829 (2007)
- Pulfer RM, "The association of malocclusion complexity and orthodontic treatment outcomes", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.468~472 (2009)
- Djeu G, "Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.292~298 (2005)[DOI]
- Jung MH, "A comparison of second premolar extraction and mini-implant total arch distalization with interproximal stripping", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.680~685 (2013)
- Johnson G, "Fracture strength of ceramic bracket tie wings subjected to tension", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.95~100 (2005)
- Silness J, "Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition", Acta Odontol Scand, 22, pp.121~135 (1964)
- Brown PN, "Clinical outcomes assessment of consecutively finished patients in a 24-month orthodontic residency : a 5-year perspective", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.665~668 (2011)
- Knierim K, "Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontics program : follow-up study for the classes of 2001-2003", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.648~655 (2006)
- McCarney R, "The Hawthorne Effect : a randomised, controlled trial", BMC Med Res Methodol, 7, pp.30~ (2007)
- Knösel M, "Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.485~492 (2016)
- Tsichlaki A, "How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.308~318 (2016)
- Cangialosi TJ, "The ABO discrepancy index : a measure of case complexity", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.270~278 (2004)
- Brown MW, "Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD", CAM orthodontic bracket system, 2015, pp.148, 1067~1074
- Jung MH, "Survival analysis of brackets and tubes : a twelve-month assessment", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.1034~1040 (2014)
- Bukhari OM, "Factors affecting patients' adherence to orthodontic appointments", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.319~324 (2016)
- Kim HK, "Submorphotypes of the maxillary first molar and their effects on alignment and rotation", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.286~293 (2014)
- Bolton WA, "The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis", Am J Orthod, 48, pp.504~529 (1962)
- Dermaut LR, "A review of the literature--part II", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110, pp.667~671 (1996)
- Batista KB, "Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth(Class II malocclusion)in children and adolescents", Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2018)
- Moreira FC, "Potentialities and limitations of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in the nonextraction treatment of Class I malocclusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 159, pp.86~96 (2021)