The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: Given the considerable disagreement between the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation, we aimed to develop a novel assessment system―the Improvement and Completion of Outcome (ICO) index―to evaluate the outcome of orthodontic treatment. Methods: Sixteen criteria from 4 major categories were established to represent the pretreatment malocclusion status, as well as the degree of improvement and level of completion of outcome during/after treatment: dental relationship (arch length discrepancy, irregularity, U1-SN, and IMPA); anteroposterior relationship (overjet, right and left molar position, ANB); vertical relationship (anterior overbite, anterior open-bite, lateral open-bite, SN-MP); and transverse relationship (dental midline discrepancy, chin point deviation, posterior cross-bite, occlusal plane cant). The score for each criterion was defined from 0 or −1 (worst) to 5 (ideal value or normal occlusion) in gradations of 1. The sum of the scores in each category indicates the area and extent of the problems. Improvement and completion percentages were estimated based on the pre- and post-treatment total scores and the maximum total score. If the completion percentage exceeded 80%, treatment outcome was considered successful. Results: Two cases, Class I malocclusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion, are presented to represent the assessment procedure using the ICO index. The difference in the level of improvement and completion of treatment outcome can be clearly explained by using 2 percentage values. Conclusions: Thus, the ICO index enables the evaluation of the quality of orthodontic treatment objectively and consecutively throughout the entire treatment process.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(4):199-211]
Abstract
Objective: Given the considerable disagreement between the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation, we aimed to develop a novel assessment system―the Improvement and Completion of Outcome (ICO) index―to evaluate the outcome of orthodontic treatment. Methods: Sixteen criteria from 4 major categories were established to represent the pretreatment malocclusion status, as well as the degree of improvement and level of completion of outcome during/after treatment: dental relationship (arch length discrepancy, irregularity, U1-SN, and IMPA); anteroposterior relationship (overjet, right and left molar position, ANB); vertical relationship (anterior overbite, anterior open-bite, lateral open-bite, SN-MP); and transverse relationship (dental midline discrepancy, chin point deviation, posterior cross-bite, occlusal plane cant). The score for each criterion was defined from 0 or −1 (worst) to 5 (ideal value or normal occlusion) in gradations of 1. The sum of the scores in each category indicates the area and extent of the problems. Improvement and completion percentages were estimated based on the pre- and post-treatment total scores and the maximum total score. If the completion percentage exceeded 80%, treatment outcome was considered successful. Results: Two cases, Class I malocclusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion, are presented to represent the assessment procedure using the ICO index. The difference in the level of improvement and completion of treatment outcome can be clearly explained by using 2 percentage values. Conclusions: Thus, the ICO index enables the evaluation of the quality of orthodontic treatment objectively and consecutively throughout the entire treatment process.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(4):199-211]
참고문헌 (21)
- Gottlieb EL, "Grading your orthodontic treatment results", J Clin Orthod, 9, pp.155~161 (1975)
- Shaw WC, "The use of occlusal indices: a European perspective", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107, pp.1~10 (1995)
- Kokich VG, "How good are you?", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.1~ (2011)
- Richmond S, "The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity", Eur J Orthod, 14, pp.125~139 (1992)
- Richmond S, "The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards", Eur J Orthod, 14, pp.180~187 (1992)
- DeGuzman L, "The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107, pp.172~176 (1995)
- al Yami EA, "Occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.439~444 (1998)
- Lieber WS, "Clinical use of the ABO-Scoring Index: reliability and subtraction frequency", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.556~564 (2003)
- Fox NA, "Measuring failure of orthodontic treatment: a comparison of outcome indicators", J Orthod, 31, pp.319~322 (2004)
- Deguchi T, "Clinical assessment of orthodontic outcomes with the peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, objective grading system, and comprehensive clinical assessment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 127, pp.434~443 (2005)
- Onyeaso CO, "Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.248~252 (2007)
- Arruda AO, "Occlusal indexes as judged by subjective opinions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.671~675 (2008)
- 손우성, "교정치료 후 나타나는 재발 경향에 대한 정량적 평가와 영향을 미치는 요소에 대한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 41(3), pp.154~163 (2011), 대한치과교정학회
- 홍미희, "Comparison of Treatment Outcome Assessment for Class I Malocclusion Patients: Peer Assessment Rating versus American Board of Orthodontics-Objective Grading System", 대한치의학회 영문학회지, 7(1), pp.6~15 (2014), 대한치의학회
- Sang-Min Lee, "Computerized occlusal analysis: correlation with occlusal indexes to assess the outcome of orthodontic treatment or the severity of malocculusion", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(1), pp.27~35 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Hinman C, "The Dental Practice Board. Orthodontics--the current status", Br J Orthod, 22, pp.287~290 (1995)
- Roberts CT, "The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics", Br J Orthod, 24, pp.139~147 (1997)
- Casko JS, "Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.589~599 (1998)
- Hong MH, "A self-assessment system for assuring the quality of orthodontic treatment outcome", PhD, pp.2015
- Huang GJ, "Evidence-based orthodontics" (2011), Wiley-Blackwell
- Baek SH, "A soft tissue analysis on facial esthetics of Korean young adults", Korean J Orthod, 21, pp.131~170 (1991)