Evaluation of buccolingual molar inclinations among different vertical facial types
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the buccolingual inclination of maxillary and mandibular molars in adults with different vertical facial types. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 135 adult patients (age, 20–45 years) with skeletal Class I maxillomandibular relationships were assigned to normodivergent (n = 46), hypodivergent (n = 49), and hyperdivergent groups (n = 40) according to linear and angular sella-nasion/gonion-menton measurements. The normodivergent group consisted of 24 females and 22 males, hypodivergent group of 26 females and 23 males, and hyperdivergent group of 24 females and 16 males. Buccolingual inclination of the maxillary and mandibular first and second molars was measured relative to the occlusal plane. One-way analysis of variance was used for intergroup comparison. Gender differences were evaluated using independent t -tests. Results: Buccolingual molar inclinations did not differ significantly between females and males (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among the buccolingual inclinations of the first and second maxillary and mandibular molars of the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual inclinations of maxillary and mandibular molars are similar in normodivergent, hyperdivergent, and hypodivergent adults with Class I sagittal relationships.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the buccolingual inclination of maxillary and mandibular molars in adults with different vertical facial types. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 135 adult patients (age, 20–45 years) with skeletal Class I maxillomandibular relationships were assigned to normodivergent (n = 46), hypodivergent (n = 49), and hyperdivergent groups (n = 40) according to linear and angular sella-nasion/gonion-menton measurements. The normodivergent group consisted of 24 females and 22 males, hypodivergent group of 26 females and 23 males, and hyperdivergent group of 24 females and 16 males. Buccolingual inclination of the maxillary and mandibular first and second molars was measured relative to the occlusal plane. One-way analysis of variance was used for intergroup comparison. Gender differences were evaluated using independent t -tests. Results: Buccolingual molar inclinations did not differ significantly between females and males (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among the buccolingual inclinations of the first and second maxillary and mandibular molars of the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual inclinations of maxillary and mandibular molars are similar in normodivergent, hyperdivergent, and hypodivergent adults with Class I sagittal relationships.
참고문헌 (22)
- Janson G, "Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.153~161 (2011)[DOI]
- Dong JK, "The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies", Int J Prosthodont, 12, pp.9~19 (1999)
- Zange SE, "Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals", Angle Orthod, 8, pp.86~90 (2011)
- Gaikwad S, "Influence of smile arc and buccal corridors on facial attractiveness: a cross sectional study", J Clin Diagn Res, 10, pp.ZC20~ZC23 (2016)
- Parrini S, "Laypeople's perceptions of frontal smile esthetics: a systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.740~750 (2016)[DOI]
- Ricketts RM, "Orthodontic diagnosis and planning", pp.1982, Rocky Mountain
- Andrews LF, "The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary", J Clin Orthod, 10, pp.99~114 (1976)
- Bennett JC, "Orthodontic treatment mechanics and the preadjusted appliance" (1993), Wolfe Publishing Mosby Year Book
- Alexander RG, "The vari-simplex discipline. Part 1. Concept and appliance design", J Clin Orthod, 17, pp.380~392 (1983)
- Roth RH, "Orthodontics, current principles and techniques", pp.665~716 (1985), CV Mosby
- Creekmore TD, "Straight-wire: the next generation", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 104, pp.8~20 (1993)[DOI]
- Shu R, "Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.246~252 (2013)[DOI]
- Ahn J, "Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, pp.148~156 (2017)[DOI]
- Tsunori M, "Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.557~562 (1998)
- Janson G, "Buccolingual inclinations of posterior teeth in subjects with different facial patterns", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.316~322 (2004)[DOI]
- Ross VA, "Influence of vertical growth pattern on faciolingual inclinations and treatment mechanics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.422~429 (1990)[DOI]
- Masumoto T, "Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible", Eur J Orthod, 23, pp.15~23 (2001)[DOI]
- Grosso LE, "Buccolingual inclinations of maxillary and mandibular first molars in relation to facial pattern", Orthod Pract, 5, pp.43~48 (2012)
- Nouri M, "Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.522~529 (2014)[DOI]
- Riedel RA, "The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion", Angle Orthod, 22, pp.142~145 (1952)
- Horn AJ, "Facial height index", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 102, pp.180~186 (1992)[DOI]
- Okada E, "Three-dimensional facial simulations and measurements: changes of facial contour and units associated with facial expression", J Craniofac Surg, 12, pp.167~174 (2001)[DOI]