Cone-beam computed tomography-guided threedimensional evaluation of treatment effectiveness of the Frog appliance
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Frog appliance in three dimensions by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: Forty patients (21 boys and 19 girls), averaged 11.7 years old, with an Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion were included in our study. They had either late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition, and the maxillary second molars had not yet erupted. All patients underwent CBCT before and after the treatment for measuring changes in the maxillary first molars, second premolars, central incisors, and profile. Paired-samples t-test was used to compare the mean difference in each variable before treatment and after the first phase of treatment. Results: The maxillary first molars were effectively distalized by 4.25 mm (p < 0.001) and 3.53 mm (p < 0.05) in the dental crown and root apex, respectively. The tipping increased by 2.25o, but the difference was not significant. Moreover the teeth moved buccally by 0.84 mm (p < 0.05) and 2.87 mm (p < 0.01) in the mesiobuccal and distobuccal cusps, respectively, whereas no significant changes occurred in the root apex. Regarding the anchorage parts, the angle of the maxillary central incisor’s long axis to the sella-nasion plane increased by 2.76o (p < 0.05) and the distance from the upper lip to the esthetic plane decreased by 0.52 mm (p = 0.01). Conclusions: The Frog appliance effectively distalized the maxillary molars with an acceptable degree of tipping, distobuccal rotation, and buccal crown torque, with only slight anchorage loss. Furthermore, CBCT image demonstrated that it is a simple and reliable method for three-dimensional analysis.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Frog appliance in three dimensions by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: Forty patients (21 boys and 19 girls), averaged 11.7 years old, with an Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion were included in our study. They had either late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition, and the maxillary second molars had not yet erupted. All patients underwent CBCT before and after the treatment for measuring changes in the maxillary first molars, second premolars, central incisors, and profile. Paired-samples t-test was used to compare the mean difference in each variable before treatment and after the first phase of treatment. Results: The maxillary first molars were effectively distalized by 4.25 mm (p < 0.001) and 3.53 mm (p < 0.05) in the dental crown and root apex, respectively. The tipping increased by 2.25o, but the difference was not significant. Moreover the teeth moved buccally by 0.84 mm (p < 0.05) and 2.87 mm (p < 0.01) in the mesiobuccal and distobuccal cusps, respectively, whereas no significant changes occurred in the root apex. Regarding the anchorage parts, the angle of the maxillary central incisor’s long axis to the sella-nasion plane increased by 2.76o (p < 0.05) and the distance from the upper lip to the esthetic plane decreased by 0.52 mm (p = 0.01). Conclusions: The Frog appliance effectively distalized the maxillary molars with an acceptable degree of tipping, distobuccal rotation, and buccal crown torque, with only slight anchorage loss. Furthermore, CBCT image demonstrated that it is a simple and reliable method for three-dimensional analysis.
참고문헌 (29)
- Alexander SA, "Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics", Curr Opin Dent, 2, pp.9~13 (1992)
- Alexander RG, "The vari-simplex discipline. Part 2. Nonextraction treatment", J Clin Orthod, 17, pp.474~482 (1983)
- Ludwig B, "The skeletal frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization", J Clin Orthod, 45, pp.77~84 (2011)[DOI]
- Byloff FK, "Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: clinical and radiological evaluation", Angle Orthod, 67, pp.249~260 (1997)
- Bondemark L, "Distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously with repelling magnets", Eur J Orthod, 14, pp.264~272 (1992)
- Escobar SA, "Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum : a clinical study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.545~549 (2007)
- Chiu PP, "A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances : distal jet versus pendulum", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.353~365 (2005)
- Mavropoulos A, "Efficiency of noncompliance simultaneous first and second upper molar distalization : a three-dimensional tooth movement analysis", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.532~539 (2005)
- Ruhi Nalcaci, "A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three-dimensional digital models", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(2), pp.82~88 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Duran GS, "Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalization", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.188~197 (2016)
- Hourfar J, "An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars", J Orthod, 41(Suppl 1), pp.S24~S2 (2014)
- Fatma Deniz Uzuner, "Comparison of transverse dental changes induced by the palatally applied Frog appliance and buccally applied Karad’s integrated distalizing system", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(2), pp.96~103 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Kapila SD, "CBCT in orthodontics : assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 44, pp.20140282~ (2015)
- Öznur Özalp, "Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 48(4), pp.269~275 (2018), 대한영상치의학회
- Jacobs R, "Dental cone beam computed tomography : justification for use in planning oral implant placement", Periodontol 2000, 66, pp.203~213 (2014)
- Kinzinger GS, "Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.8~23 (2004)
- Flores-Mir C, "Efficiency of molar distalization associated with second and third molar eruption stage", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.735~742 (2013)
- Joseph AA, "An evaluation of the pendulum distalizing appliance", Semin Orthod, 6, pp.129~135 (2000)
- Ju-Man Kang, "A three-dimensional finite element analysis of molar distalization with a palatal plate, pendulum, and headgear according to molar eruption stage", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(5), pp.290~300 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Ahmad Sharafeddin Burhan, "Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial", 대한치과교정학회지, 43(2), pp.101~109 (2013), 대한치과교정학회
- Mehmet Bayram, "The frog appliance for upper molar distalization: a case report", 대한치과교정학회지, 40(1), pp.50~60 (2010), 대한치과교정학회
- Kinzinger G, "Molar distalization with different pendulum appliances : in vitro registration of orthodontic forces and moments in the initial phase", J Orofac Orthop, 65, pp.389~409 (2004)
- Kinzinger GS, "Molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance--in vitro analysis of the force systems and in vivo study in children and adolescents", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.558~567 (2005)
- Karlsson I, "Intraoral maxillary molar distalization", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.923~929 (2006)
- Byloff FK, "Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: the effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends", Angle Orthod, 67, pp.261~270 (1997)
- Chaqués-Asensi J, "Effects of the pendulum appliance on the dentofacial complex", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.254~257 (2001)
- Bussick TJ, "Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, pp.333~343 (2000)
- Nienkemper M, "Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption", J Orofac Orthop, 75, pp.118~132 (2014)
- Fudalej P, "Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.722~729 (2011)