Displacement pattern of the anterior segment using antero-posterior lingual retractor combined with a palatal plate
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of two appliances on the en masse retraction of the anterior teeth anchored by temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Methods: The sample comprised 46 nongrowing hyperdivergent adult patients who planned to undergo upper first premolar extraction using lingual retractors. They were divided into three groups, based on the lingual appliance used: the C-lingual retractor (CLR) group (group 1, n = 16) and two antero-posterior lingual retractor (APLR) groups (n = 30, groups 2 and 3). The APLR group was divided by the posterior tube angulation; posterior tube parallel to the occlusal plane (group 2, n = 15) and distally tipped tube (group 3, n = 15). A retrospective clinical investigation of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue relationships was performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained pretreatment and post en masse retraction of the anterior teeth. Results: All groups achieved significant incisor and canine retraction. The upper posterior teeth did not drift significantly during the retraction period. The APLR group had less angulation change in the anterior dentition, compared to the CLR group. By changing the tube angulation in the APLR, the intrusive force significantly increased in the distally tipped tube of group 3 patients and remarkably reduced the occlusal plane angle. Conclusions: Compared to the CLR, the APLR provides better anterior torque control and canine tipping while achieving bodily translation. Furthermore, changing the tube angulation will affect the amount of incisor intrusion, even in patients with similar palatal vault depth, without the need for additional TSADs. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(6):289-298]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of two appliances on the en masse retraction of the anterior teeth anchored by temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Methods: The sample comprised 46 nongrowing hyperdivergent adult patients who planned to undergo upper first premolar extraction using lingual retractors. They were divided into three groups, based on the lingual appliance used: the C-lingual retractor (CLR) group (group 1, n = 16) and two antero-posterior lingual retractor (APLR) groups (n = 30, groups 2 and 3). The APLR group was divided by the posterior tube angulation; posterior tube parallel to the occlusal plane (group 2, n = 15) and distally tipped tube (group 3, n = 15). A retrospective clinical investigation of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue relationships was performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained pretreatment and post en masse retraction of the anterior teeth. Results: All groups achieved significant incisor and canine retraction. The upper posterior teeth did not drift significantly during the retraction period. The APLR group had less angulation change in the anterior dentition, compared to the CLR group. By changing the tube angulation in the APLR, the intrusive force significantly increased in the distally tipped tube of group 3 patients and remarkably reduced the occlusal plane angle. Conclusions: Compared to the CLR, the APLR provides better anterior torque control and canine tipping while achieving bodily translation. Furthermore, changing the tube angulation will affect the amount of incisor intrusion, even in patients with similar palatal vault depth, without the need for additional TSADs. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(6):289-298]
참고문헌 (16)
- Hong RK, "Lever-arm and miniimplant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.129~141 (2005)
- 이언화, "교정용 미니스크류를 이용한 연속호선과 분절호선의 유한요소분석", 대한치과교정학회지, 41(4), pp.227~253 (2011), 대한치과교정학회
- 정광모, "상악 치아군의 저항중심의 위치에 관한 3차원 유한요소 해석", 대한치과교정학회지, 39(2), pp.83~94 (2009), 대한치과교정학회
- Chung KR, "Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.331~339 (2001)
- 모성서, "Torque control during lingual anterior retraction without posterior appliances", 대한치과교정학회지, 43(1), pp.3~14 (2013), 대한치과교정학회
- Chung KR, "Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.112~123 (2008)
- Nelson G, "Three-dimensional retraction of anterior teeth with orthodontic miniplates in patients with temporomandibular disorder", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.720~726 (2012)
- Kim JS, "Analysis of lingual en masse retraction combining a C-lingual retractor and a palatal plate", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.662~669 (2011)
- Kwon SY, "Computer-aided designing and manufacturing of lingual fixed orthodontic appliance using 2D", 3D registration software and rapid prototyping, 2014, pp.2014, 164164~
- Kwon SY, "Antero-posterior lingual sliding retraction system for orthodontic correction of hyperdivergent Class II protrusion", Head Face Med, 10, pp.22~ (2014)
- Kim SH, "Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for enmasse retraction: a preliminary study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.268~276 (2009)
- Jeong-Hyun Jee, "En-masse retraction with a preformed nickel-titanium and stainless steel archwire assembly and temporary skeletal anchorage devices without posterior bonding", 대한치과교정학회지, 44(5), pp.236~245 (2014), 대한치과교정학회
- Melsen B., "Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement", Angle Orthod, 69, pp.151~158 (1999)
- Ahn HW, "Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.212~221 (2013)
- Park JH, "Esthetic orthodontic treatment with a double J retractor and temporary anchorage devices", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 141, pp.796~805 (2012)
- Ryoon-Ki Hong, "Orthodontic treatment of gummy smile by maxillary total intrusion with a midpalatal absolute anchorage system", 대한치과교정학회지, 43(3), pp.147~158 (2013), 대한치과교정학회