본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effect of Information Sharing on Dimensions of Trust and Logistics Performance

이창준|하영규
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2024.06|유통과학연구 (Journal of Distribution Science)|제22권 제6호|pp. 123-131|DOI 10.15722/jds.22.06.202406.123

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Supply Chain Management (SCM)Information SharingCognitive TrustLogistics PerformanceAffective Trust

초록

Purpose: This study aims to empirically analyze the effect of information sharing on the two dimensions of trust and logistics performance in the relationship between firms in the supply chain. Research design, data and methodology: In this study, information sharing is a variable for information competency of the entire supply chain. Moreover, we classified trust into quantitative and qualitative trust and analyzed the two paths through which information sharing reaches logistics performance. To examine these correlations, we conducted a survey among professionals in supply chain-related departments in South Korea. Based on 350 completed questionnaires, we tested the hypotheses with structural equation modeling using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0. Results: We found that information sharing has a significant positive effect on trust and logistics performance, which is a typical index of supply chain performance. These results show that information itself is considered a partner to a firm’s competencies in operating the supply chain and plays a major role in forming the other’s competencies and trust for the present and future. Conclusions: As these competencies and trust consequentially affect logistics performance, supply chain managers must pay attention to the importance of information competency and consider ways of promoting it to improve logistics performance across the entire supply chain

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to empirically analyze the effect of information sharing on the two dimensions of trust and logistics performance in the relationship between firms in the supply chain. Research design, data and methodology: In this study, information sharing is a variable for information competency of the entire supply chain. Moreover, we classified trust into quantitative and qualitative trust and analyzed the two paths through which information sharing reaches logistics performance. To examine these correlations, we conducted a survey among professionals in supply chain-related departments in South Korea. Based on 350 completed questionnaires, we tested the hypotheses with structural equation modeling using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0. Results: We found that information sharing has a significant positive effect on trust and logistics performance, which is a typical index of supply chain performance. These results show that information itself is considered a partner to a firm’s competencies in operating the supply chain and plays a major role in forming the other’s competencies and trust for the present and future. Conclusions: As these competencies and trust consequentially affect logistics performance, supply chain managers must pay attention to the importance of information competency and consider ways of promoting it to improve logistics performance across the entire supply chain

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Ballou, R. H., "New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities", Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), pp.7~18 (2000)[DOI]
  2. Bhattacharyya, S. S., "Study of adoption and absorption of emerging technologies for smart supply chain management : A dynamic capabilities perspective", International Journal of Applied Logistics, 11(2), pp.14~54 (2021)[DOI]
  3. Blau, B. M., "Social trust and the liquidity of cross-listed securities", Journal of Business Research, 78, pp.155~171 (2017)[DOI]
  4. Cambra-Fierro, J. J., "Creating satisfaction in the demand-supply chain : The buyers' perspective", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 13(3), pp.211~224 (2008)[DOI]
  5. Chen, S. J., "To disclose or to falsify : The effects of cognitive trust and affective trust on customer cooperation in contact tracing", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, pp.102867~ (2021)[DOI]
  6. Chow, G., "Logistics performance : Definition and measurement", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(1), pp.17~28 (1994)[DOI]
  7. de Almeida, M. M. K., "The importance of trust and collaboration between companies to mitigate the bullwhip effect in supply chain management", Acta Scientiarum Technology, 39(2), pp.201~210 (2017)[DOI]
  8. Fan, H., "The effectiveness of supply chain risk information processing capability : An information processing perspective", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(4), pp.414~425 (2016)[DOI]
  9. Fransoo, J. C., "Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 5(2), pp.78~89 (2000)[DOI]
  10. Ganesan, S., "Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, 58(2), pp.1~19 (1994)[DOI]
  11. Germain, R., "The implications of just-in-time for logistics organization management and performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 17(2), pp.19~34 (1996)
  12. Glaveli, N., "Exploring the role of fitness instructor's interaction quality skills in building customer trust in the service provider and customer satisfaction", European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(3), pp.767~788 (2023)[DOI]
  13. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2010), Prentice Hall
  14. Harrison, A., "The role of coherent supply chain strategy and performance management in achieving competitive advantage : An international survey", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(3), pp.263~271 (2002)[DOI]
  15. Hassan Ibrahim, N., "Information sharing and trust during major incidents : Findings from the oil industry", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), pp.1916~1928 (2012)[DOI]
  16. Holland, C. P., "Cooperative supply chain management : The impact of interorganizational information systems", The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(2), pp.117~133 (1995)[DOI]
  17. Johnson, D., "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships", Journal of Business Research, 58(4), pp.500~507 (2005)[DOI]
  18. Khan, M., "Trust, information sharing and uncertainty : An empirical investigation into their impact on sustainability in service supply chains in the United Arab Emirates", Sustainable Development, 26(6), pp.870~878 (2018)[DOI]
  19. Kitchot, S., "The mediating effects of HRM practices on the relationship between SCM and SMEs firm performance in Thailand", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 26(1), pp.87~101 (2021)[DOI]
  20. Kumar, N., "The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers", Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), pp.54~65 (1995)[DOI]
  21. Lacovou, C. L., "Electronic data interchange and small organizations : Adoption and impact of technology", MIS Quarterly, 19(4), pp.465~485 (1995)[DOI]
  22. Lawler, E. J., "An affect theory of social exchange", American Journal of Sociology, 107, pp.321~352 (2001)[DOI]
  23. Lee, H. L., "Information distortion in a supply chain : The bullwhip effect", Management Science, 43(4), pp.546~558 (1997)[DOI]
  24. Lewis, J. D., "Trust as a social reality", Social Forces, 63(4), pp.967~985 (1985)[DOI]
  25. Li, S., "Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management", Decision Support Systems, 42(3), pp.1641~1656 (2006)[DOI]
  26. McKnight, D. H., "Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships", Academy of Management Review, 23(3), pp.473~490 (1998)[DOI]
  27. Nyaga, G. N., "Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ?", Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), pp.101~114 (2010)[DOI]
  28. Ouyang, Y., "The effect of information sharing on supply chain stability and the bullwhip effect", European Journal of Operational Research, 182(3), pp.1107~1121 (2007)[DOI]
  29. Ozer, O., "Information sharing, advice provision, or delegation: What leads to higher trust and trustworthiness?", Management Science, 64(1), pp.474~493 (2018)[DOI]
  30. Prajogo, D., "Supply chain integration and performance : The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration", International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), pp.514~522 (2012)[DOI]
  31. Sahay, B. S., "Understanding trust in supply chain relationships", Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(8), pp.553~563 (2003)[DOI]
  32. Sako, M., "The role of trust in Japanese buyer-supplier relationships", Ricerche Economiche, 23, pp.449~473 (1991)
  33. Schurr, P. H., "Influences on exchange processes : Buyers' preconceptions of a seller's trustworthiness and bargaining toughness", Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), pp.939~953 (1985)[DOI]
  34. Smith, J. R., "Electronic data interchange and enterprise resource planning technology in supply chain contracts", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142, pp.106330~ (2020)[DOI]
  35. Shukla, R. K., "Understanding of supply chain : A literature review", International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(3), pp.2059~2072 (2011)
  36. Stank, T. P., "Logistics service performance : Estimating its influence on market share", Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), pp.27~55 (2003)[DOI]
  37. Wang, M., "Impacts of supply chain uncertainty and risk on the logistics performance", Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(3), pp.689~704 (2018)[DOI]
  38. Wang, X., "The bullwhip effect : Progress, trends and directions", European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), pp.691~701 (2016)[DOI]
  39. Yuan, Y., "The impact of information sharing on the performance of horizontal logistics collaboration : A simulation study in an agri-food supply chain", IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), pp.2722~2727 (2019)[DOI]
  40. Zhou, H., "Supply chain practice and information sharing", Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), pp.1348~1365 (2007)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

정서적 신뢰 및 인지적 신뢰가 상호정보공유와 물류성과에 미치는 영향남현정, 하병천한국로지스틱스학회 · 로지스틱스연구2015 · 제23권 제2호An Empirical Study on the Effect of Trust between Firms in the Supply Chain on Agility and Logistics Performance김수효, 이창준, Ha Byoung-Chun한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2024 · 제22권 제7호The Effect of Trust and Relationship Commitment on Supply Chain Performance through Integration and Collaboration장건, 이준겸사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2022 · 제27권 제5호Collaborative Communication, Information Sharing and Supply Chain Performance김수효, Changjoon LEE한국유통과학회 · 산경연구논집2021 · 제12권 제5호자산전용성과 협업환경하에서의 정보공유가 공급사슬에 미치는 영향 : 통합적 SCM 성과형성 모델김태룡, 송장근한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2013 · 제11권 제4호정보공유 선행요인, 정보공유, 리스크 정보공유가 공급사슬성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구김상오, 윤선희한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2007 · 제18권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

A Dynamic Approach to Understanding Business PerformanceHALIM Kusuma Indawatipp. 1-10Audit Committee, Board of Independent Commissioner, and Institutional Ownership on Earnings Quality with Strengthening of Earnings GrowthHANAFIE Hadriana, JANNAH Raodahtul, BAYAN Andi Yustika Manrimawagau, ABDULLAH Muhammad Wahyuddin, IKBAL Muhpp. 11-22Increasing Innovation Performance in SMEs Trade: Organizational Forgetting, Knowledge Management, and Business Agility as PredictorsBONGSO Gromyko, BUDIONO Irfanpp. 23-32Exploring the Influence of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality on User Satisfaction in Virtual TourismNGUYEN Dat Van, NGUYEN Thich Van, NGUYEN Tho Vanpp. 33-44Distribution of Product Value Chain: Do Farmers Receive the Lowest Benefits? The Case of Snubnose Pompano FisheryNGUYEN Duy Ngoc, NGUYEN Nga Thi, Van NGUYEN Ngoc, HO Chau Minhpp. 45-56
원문 보기