본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자산전용성과 협업환경하에서의 정보공유가 공급사슬에 미치는 영향 : 통합적 SCM 성과형성 모델

The Effect of Asset Specificity, Information Sharing, and a Collaborative Environment on Supply Chain Management (SCM): An Integrated SCM Performance Formation Model

2

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose – The objective of this paper is to investigate the effectof asset specificity, the level of information sharing, the importanceof information sharing, and an integrated collaborative environment onsupply chain performance. Research design, data, and methodology - Data collection was implementedas follows: questionnaires were distributed to 250 companiesthat have business ties with Halla Climate Control Corporation. The empirical study to test our hypothesis was based on statisticalanalysis (using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0). The hypothesis of thispaper is that the asset specificity variable has positive effects on thefollowing variables: Level of information sharing, the importance ofinformation sharing, and integrated collaborative environment. Moreover the variables, the level of information sharing, and the importanceof information sharing are strongly influenced by the variableintegrated collaborative environment, and these when combined,have an effect on the dependent variable, supply chain performance. We tested our hypothesized model utilizing path analysis with latentvariables. Results - According to the results of our analysis, hypothesis H1,which tests whether there is a relationship between asset specificityand the integrated collaborative environment, is supported at the 0.01level. Hypotheses H2 and H3 were also confirmed, and asset specificityhad positive effects (+) on the level of information sharingvariable. The importance of the information sharing variable was statisticallysignificant at the 0.01 level. Hypotheses H4 and H5 positedthat the integrated collaborative environment variable would have apositive effect on the level of information sharing; the importance ofinformation sharing variable was strongly supported statistically, witha significant p-value below. Moreover, the level of information shar-ing (H6), and the importance of information sharing (H7) variablesalso had a statistically relevant influence on supply chainperformance. As a result, existence of a collaborative system betweencompanies would influence supply chain performance by strengtheningreal-time information access and information sharing. Thus, it is importantto construct a collaborative environment where informationsharing among companies and cooperation is possible. Conclusions - First, with rapid changes in the business environment,it becomes necessary for enterprises to acquire the right informationin order to properly implement SCM. For successful SCM,firms should understand the importance of collaboration with supplychain partners and an internally built collaboration system, which inturn will better promote a partnership commitment with suppliers aswell as collaborative integration with buyers. A collaborative system,as we suggest in this paper, facilitates the maintenance of along-term relationship of trust, and can help reinforce informationsharing. Second, it is necessary to increase information sharing overtime via a collaborative system so that employees of the suppliers becomeaware of the system. The more proactive and positive attitudesare towards such a collaborative system by the managerial group, thehigher the level of information sharing will be among the users. Successful SCM performance is achieved by information sharingthrough a collaborative environment rather than by investing only insetting up an information system.

Abstract

Purpose – The objective of this paper is to investigate the effectof asset specificity, the level of information sharing, the importanceof information sharing, and an integrated collaborative environment onsupply chain performance. Research design, data, and methodology - Data collection was implementedas follows: questionnaires were distributed to 250 companiesthat have business ties with Halla Climate Control Corporation. The empirical study to test our hypothesis was based on statisticalanalysis (using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0). The hypothesis of thispaper is that the asset specificity variable has positive effects on thefollowing variables: Level of information sharing, the importance ofinformation sharing, and integrated collaborative environment. Moreover the variables, the level of information sharing, and the importanceof information sharing are strongly influenced by the variableintegrated collaborative environment, and these when combined,have an effect on the dependent variable, supply chain performance. We tested our hypothesized model utilizing path analysis with latentvariables. Results - According to the results of our analysis, hypothesis H1,which tests whether there is a relationship between asset specificityand the integrated collaborative environment, is supported at the 0.01level. Hypotheses H2 and H3 were also confirmed, and asset specificityhad positive effects (+) on the level of information sharingvariable. The importance of the information sharing variable was statisticallysignificant at the 0.01 level. Hypotheses H4 and H5 positedthat the integrated collaborative environment variable would have apositive effect on the level of information sharing; the importance ofinformation sharing variable was strongly supported statistically, witha significant p-value below. Moreover, the level of information shar-ing (H6), and the importance of information sharing (H7) variablesalso had a statistically relevant influence on supply chainperformance. As a result, existence of a collaborative system betweencompanies would influence supply chain performance by strengtheningreal-time information access and information sharing. Thus, it is importantto construct a collaborative environment where informationsharing among companies and cooperation is possible. Conclusions - First, with rapid changes in the business environment,it becomes necessary for enterprises to acquire the right informationin order to properly implement SCM. For successful SCM,firms should understand the importance of collaboration with supplychain partners and an internally built collaboration system, which inturn will better promote a partnership commitment with suppliers aswell as collaborative integration with buyers. A collaborative system,as we suggest in this paper, facilitates the maintenance of along-term relationship of trust, and can help reinforce informationsharing. Second, it is necessary to increase information sharing overtime via a collaborative system so that employees of the suppliers becomeaware of the system. The more proactive and positive attitudesare towards such a collaborative system by the managerial group, thehigher the level of information sharing will be among the users. Successful SCM performance is achieved by information sharingthrough a collaborative environment rather than by investing only insetting up an information system.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Bensaou, M., "Interorganizational Cooperation : The Role of Information Technology An Empirical Comparison of U. S. and Japanese Supplier Relations", Information System Research, 8(2), pp.107~124 (1997)
  2. Bensaou, M., "Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships", Sloan Management Review, 40(3), pp.35~44 (1999)
  3. 최수정, "기업간 관계자산 특유성이 전자적 협력과 성과에 미치는 영향", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), pp.121~149 (2006), 한국경영정보학회
  4. Sheu, C., "Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration : evidence from an international study", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(1), pp.24~49 (2006)
  5. Cooper, M., "Supply Chain Management : More Than a New Name for Logistics", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(1), pp.1~13 (1997)
  6. Corsten, Daniel, "Exploring the performance effects of key-supplier collaboration", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(6), pp.445~461 (2005)
  7. Derocher, R., "Six Supply Chain Lessons for the Millennium", Supply Chain Management Review, 13(4), pp.34~41 (2000)
  8. Dunn, S. C., "Supplier Assistance Within Supplier Development Initiatives", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(3), pp.19~29 (2004)
  9. Dyer, J. H., "Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage : Evidence from the Auto Industry", Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), pp.271~291 (1996)
  10. Dyer, J. H., "Effective Interfirm Collaboration : How Firms Minimize Transaction cost and Maximize Transaction Value", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.535~556 (1997)
  11. Dyer, J.H., "The Relational View : Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(4), pp.660~679 (1998)
  12. Frohlich, M. T., "Arcs of Integration : An International Study of Supply Chain Strategy", Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), pp.185~200 (2001)
  13. S. Ganesan, "Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships", Journal of Marketing, 58(2), pp.1~19 (1994)
  14. 하병천, "공급사슬에서의 정보인프라공유와 관계자본형성에 관한 연구: 유입․유출 정보공유에 대하여", 한국생산관리학회지, 23(1), pp.23~42 (2012), 한국생산관리학회
  15. Heide, J. B., "Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?", Journal of Marketing, 56(2), pp.32~44 (1992)
  16. Heilklila, J., "From Supply to Demand Chain Management : Efficiency and Customer Satisfaction", Journal of Operations Management, 20(6), pp.747~767 (2002)
  17. Hewett, K., "Dependence, trust, and relational behavior on the part of foreign subsidiary marketing operations : implications for managing global marketing operations", Journal of Marketing, 65(4), pp.51~66 (2001)
  18. Humphreys, P. K., "Collaborative Buyer-Supplier Relationships in Hong Kong Manufacturing Firms", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 6(4), pp.152~162 (2001)
  19. Jap, S. D., "Pie-Expansion Efforts : Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships", Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), pp.1~475 (1999)
  20. Johnston, D. A., "Effects of Supplier Trust on Performance of Cooperative Supplier Relationships", Journal of operations Management, 22(1), pp.23~38 (2004)
  21. 정재을, "거래비용관점으로 본 우리나라 자동차 협력없체들의 성과평가", 경영연구, 19(1), pp.109~138 (2004), 한국산업경영학회
  22. 김철수, "공급사슬 성과에 대한 협업의 매개효과에 관한 연구: 이동통신산업의 구매사-공급사를 중심으로", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), pp.1~27 (2006), 한국경영정보학회
  23. 김도헌, "e-SCM의 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 사례 연구", 유통과학연구, 6(2), pp.21~40 (2008), 한국유통과학회
  24. 김진완, "전자적 파트너십에서 공급자의 전략적 혜택 창출을 위한 협업의 효과에 관한 연구", 정보시스템연구, 17(4), pp.341~367 (2008), 한국정보시스템학회
  25. 김태환, "자동차 부품산업의 공간적 재구조화와 입지 패턴 변화", 대한지리학회지, 42(3), pp.434~452 (2007), 대한지리학회
  26. Kim, Young-Min, "Analysis of Research Trends in Journal of Distribution Science", Journal of Distribution Science, 8(4), pp.7~17 (2010)
  27. Kumar, K., "Sustainable Collaboration : Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganization System", MIS Quarterly, 20(2), pp.279~300 (1996)
  28. Kwon, Ik-Whan G., "Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(2), pp.4~14 (2004)
  29. Lee, C. C., "Knowledge value chain", The Journal of Management Development, 19(9), pp.783~794 (2000)
  30. Lee, Dong-Man, "Purchase Decision Considering Transaction Cost In Electronic Commerce", Korean management review, 31(6), pp.1729~1746 (2002)
  31. Lee, Gi-Wan, "A study of SCM strategic plan : Focusing on the case of LG electronics", Journal of Distribution Science, 9(3), pp.83~96 (2011)
  32. Lee, H. L., "The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chain", Sloan Management Review, 38(3), pp.93~102 (1997)
  33. 이호형, "자산특유성이 전자무역 활용성과에 미치는 영향", 통상정보연구, 12(4), pp.25~45 (2010), 한국통상정보학회
  34. Lee, Hak-sik, "Structural equation modeling with AMOS 16.0", pp.189~191 (2011), Bobmunsa
  35. 이석인, "조직간 전자거래의 수준이 조직간 관계의 성과에 미치는 영향", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 12(3), pp.115~133 (2002), 한국경영정보학회
  36. Lin, F. R., "Effects of Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance in Electronic Commerce", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), pp.258~268 (2002)
  37. Mentzer, J. T., "Collaboration : The Enablers, Impediments, and Benefits", Supply Chain Management Review, 4(4), pp.52~58 (2000)
  38. Metters, R., "Quantifying the Bullwhip Effects in Supply Chains", Journal of Operations Management, 15(1), pp.89~100 (1997)
  39. Moberg, C., "Identifying Antecedents of Information Exchange within Supply Chains", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(9), pp.755~770 (2002)
  40. Monczka, R. M., "Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliences : The Buying Company Perspective", Decision Science, 29(3), pp.553~573 (1998)
  41. 오세구, "기업 간 협업환경 및 신뢰의 구축이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 - 통합된 공급사슬의 관점에서", 한국생산관리학회지, 21(4), pp.413~426 (2010), 한국생산관리학회
  42. 박정수, "장기지향성과 자산특유성이 공급사슬관리 추진방식과 성과에 미치는 영향", 경영과학, 24(1), pp.45~62 (2007), 한국경영과학회
  43. Ruyter, K., "Antecedent of Commitment and Trust in Customer-Supplier Relationships in High Technology Markets", Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2), pp.271~286 (2001)
  44. Sahin, F., "Flow Coordination and Information Sharing in Supply Chains : Review, Implication, and Directions for Future Research", Decision Science, 33(4), pp.505~536 (2002)
  45. Sanchez-Rodriguez, C., "The Effect of Supplier Development Initiatives on Purchasing performance: A Structural Model", Supply Chain Management, 10(4), pp.289~301 (2005)
  46. Selnes, F., "Promoting Relationship Learning", Journal of Marketing, 67, pp.80~95 (2003)
  47. Seo, Younjoo, "A Study on Supplier Relations, Asset Specificity and Suppliers' Performance In The Korean Auto Industry", Korean Management Science Review, 16(1), pp.115~135 (1999)
  48. Sheu, C., "Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration : evidence from an international study", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), pp.24~49 (2006)
  49. Simatupang, T.M., "The Collaborative Supply Chain", International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), pp.15~30 (2002)
  50. Simchi-Levi, D., "Designing and Managing the Supply Chain" (2003), Irwin, McGraw-Hill
  51. 송장근, "물류 및 공급사슬 경쟁전략으로서의 정보공유 : 공급자 개발계획의 성과형성모델", 한국SCM학회지, 9(2), pp.89~98 (2009), 한국SCM학회
  52. 송장근, "정보공유를 통한 성과형성모델: 자산전용성과 정보공유가 공급사슬 내 성과에 미치는 영향", 한국생산관리학회지, 21(1), pp.101~121 (2010), 한국생산관리학회
  53. Stank, T. P., "Supply Chain Collaboration and Logistical Service Performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), pp.29~48 (2001)
  54. Subramani, M., "Safeguarding Investments in Asymmetric Interorganizational Relationships : Theory and Evidence", Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), pp.46~62 (2003)
  55. Sun, P. C., "The Correlations among Domain Knowledge Specificity, Joint New Product Development and Relationship Performance", International Journal of Commerce and Management, 17(2), pp.44~55 (2007)
  56. Suh, Ah-Young, "An Empirical Study on Success Factors of Supply Chain Management by Supplier-Buyer Relationship Type", Information Systems Review, 3(1), pp.191~203 (2001)
  57. Towill, D. R., "Industrial Dynamics Simulation Models in the Design of Supply Chains", International Journal of physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 22(5), pp.3~13 (1992)
  58. 윤명길, "한국에서의 유통학문 연구 방법론에 대한 소고", 유통과학연구, 5(1), pp.75~88 (2007), 한국유통과학회
  59. Zaheer, AKbar, "Relational Governance as an Interorganizational Strategy : An Empirical Test of the Role of Thrust in Economic Exchange", Strategic Management Journal, 16(54), pp.374~392 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)