Distribution of Product Value Chain: Do Farmers Receive the Lowest Benefits? The Case of Snubnose Pompano Fishery
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study utilizes value chain analysis to investigate the distribution of benefits in the snubnose pompano product value chain, aiming to ascertain how these benefits are obtained by the farmers. Research design, data and methodology: The study approaches the assessment components from the economic analysis framework of the value chain. It investigates the various actors involved in the value chain of snubnose pompano fishery products in the South-Central Coast region of Vietnam from 2020 to 2022. Data collection is conducted through direct interviews with the actors utilizing survey questionnaires. Results: The results indicate that farmers, traders, and processors are key actors in the chain. The distribution of benefits between farmers and other actors has improved and tended towards greater harmony over the years. However, farmers receive benefits that are not commensurate with their value-added contribution. Farmers contribute the greatest value-added, but their profit margin share is not commensurate with the ratio of their value-added contribution to the chain. Farmers suffer the highest degrees of losses caused by price fluctuation and production risks, while other actors face smaller risks. Conclusions: The study offers some recommendations to adjust the distribution of benefits and risks among participants in this value chain.
Abstract
Purpose: This study utilizes value chain analysis to investigate the distribution of benefits in the snubnose pompano product value chain, aiming to ascertain how these benefits are obtained by the farmers. Research design, data and methodology: The study approaches the assessment components from the economic analysis framework of the value chain. It investigates the various actors involved in the value chain of snubnose pompano fishery products in the South-Central Coast region of Vietnam from 2020 to 2022. Data collection is conducted through direct interviews with the actors utilizing survey questionnaires. Results: The results indicate that farmers, traders, and processors are key actors in the chain. The distribution of benefits between farmers and other actors has improved and tended towards greater harmony over the years. However, farmers receive benefits that are not commensurate with their value-added contribution. Farmers contribute the greatest value-added, but their profit margin share is not commensurate with the ratio of their value-added contribution to the chain. Farmers suffer the highest degrees of losses caused by price fluctuation and production risks, while other actors face smaller risks. Conclusions: The study offers some recommendations to adjust the distribution of benefits and risks among participants in this value chain.
참고문헌 (27)
- Ali, H., "Making sense of the market : Assessing the participatory market chain approach to aquaculture value chain development in Nepal and Bangladesh", Aquaculture, 493(2018), pp.395~405 (2018)[DOI]
- Ali, H., "Transformation of the feed supply segment of the aquaculture value chain in Bangladesh", Aquaculture, 576(2023), pp.739897~ (2023)[DOI]
- Asche, F., "The development of large scale aquaculture production : A comparison of the supply chains for chicken and salmon", Aquaculture, 493(2018), pp.446~455 (2018)[DOI]
- Ambos, B., "The nature of innovation in global value chains", Journal of World Business, 56(4), pp.101221~ (2021)[DOI]
- Bush, S. R., "Emerging trends in aquaculture value chain research", Aquaculture, 498(2019), pp.428~434 (2019)[DOI]
- De Silva, D. A. M., "Value-chain in small scale fisheries, Value-chain bibliography" (2012), Food and Agriculture Organization
- FAO, "Fishery value chain analysis in Cambodia", Food and Agriculture Organization, ~ (2011)
- Gereffi, G, "Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism" (1994), Praeger
- Gereffi, G., "A commodity chains framework for analyzing global industries", Institute of Development Studies, 8(12), pp.1~9 (1999)
- Gereffi, G., "Commodity chains and global capitalism" (1994), Praeger
- Revenue distribution through the seafood value chain, "Gudmundsson, E.", FAO, 42~, pp.FAO Fisheries Circular, No. 1019 (2006)
- Hansen, M. T., "The innovation value chain", Harvard business review, 85(6), pp.121~130 (2007)
- Kaplinsky, R., "A Handbook for Value Chain Research" (2001), The Institute of International Development Research Center (IDRC)
- Kassam, L., "A comparative assessment of the poverty impacts of pond and cage aquaculture in Ghana", Aquaculture, 470(2017), pp.110~122 (2017)[DOI]
- Kramer, M. R., "The ecosystem of shared value", Harvard business review, 94(10), pp.80~89 (2016)
- Lim, G., "Value chain upgrading : Evidence from the Singaporean aquaculture industry", Marine Policy, 63(2016), pp.191~197 (2016)[DOI]
- Macfadyen, G., "Value-chain analysis-An assessment methodology to estimate Egyptian aquaculture sector performance", Aquaculture, 362(2012), pp.18~27 (2012)[DOI]
- Nguyen, N. D., "Balancing Benefits between Fishermen and Actors in Value Chains of Capture Fish Products : The Case of Skipjack Tuna in Khanh Hoa", Science and Technology Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(2012), pp.11~19 (2012)
- Nguyen, N. D., "Benefit distribution of value chain : the case of marine fishing products in Khanh Hoa", Economics Development Journal, 280, pp.78~96 (2014)[DOI]
- Nguyen, T. N., "Distribution of benefits in the supply chain of red snapper productsin Central South Vietnam", Journal of Economics and Development, 263, pp.63~73 (2019)
- Nguyen, V. T., "Vietnam's pangasius market - income distribution in the chain - production cost of raw pangasius- industry development solutions", Journal of Science, Can Tho University, 32, pp.38~44 (2014)
- Pomeroy, R., "Linkages and Trust in the Value Chain for Small-scale Aquaculture in Asia", Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 48(4), pp.542~554 (2017)[DOI]
- Roheim, C.A., "Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries" (2005), The World Bank
- Springer-Heinze, A., "ValueLinks manual: The methodology of value chain promotion", GTZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH), ~ (2007)
- VNM, "Foundation for the development of small and medium-sized enterprises and farming households in the Mekong Delta. NPT", pp.Education Publishing House, 013 Program
- "The Administrative Map of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam" (2024)[URL]
- Yildirim, C., "Measuring network efficiency of the aquaculture value chain in Turkey", Aquaculture, 576(2023), pp.739896~ (2023)[DOI]