Factors affecting smile esthetics in adults with different types of anterior overjet malocclusion
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively assess the relationship of smile esthetic variables with various types of malocclusion, and identify the cephalometric factors affecting smile measurements. Methods: This retrospective study included 106 patients who were treated with retention at the orthodontic department of Taipei Medical University Hospital. Hard-tissue variables were measured using lateral cephalographic tracings, and nine smile esthetic variables were measured using facial photographs. The patients were divided into three groups according to their overjet (< 0, 0–4, and > 4 mm). An analysis of variance was conducted to compare the pretreatment cephalometric variables and smile esthetic variables among the three groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the cephalometric factors affecting the smile measurements in each group. Results: Except the upper midline and buccal corridor ratio, all of the smile measurements differed significantly among the three groups before orthodontic treatment. Some of the smile characteristics were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in different types of malocclusion. The overjet was the major factor influencing the smile pattern in all three types of malocclusion. Conclusions: Smile characteristics differ between different types of malocclusion; the smile may be influenced by skeletal pattern, dental procumbency, or facial type. These findings indicate that establishment of an optimal horizontal anterior teeth relationship is the key to improving the smile characteristics in different types of malocclusion.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(1):31-38]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively assess the relationship of smile esthetic variables with various types of malocclusion, and identify the cephalometric factors affecting smile measurements. Methods: This retrospective study included 106 patients who were treated with retention at the orthodontic department of Taipei Medical University Hospital. Hard-tissue variables were measured using lateral cephalographic tracings, and nine smile esthetic variables were measured using facial photographs. The patients were divided into three groups according to their overjet (< 0, 0–4, and > 4 mm). An analysis of variance was conducted to compare the pretreatment cephalometric variables and smile esthetic variables among the three groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the cephalometric factors affecting the smile measurements in each group. Results: Except the upper midline and buccal corridor ratio, all of the smile measurements differed significantly among the three groups before orthodontic treatment. Some of the smile characteristics were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in different types of malocclusion. The overjet was the major factor influencing the smile pattern in all three types of malocclusion. Conclusions: Smile characteristics differ between different types of malocclusion; the smile may be influenced by skeletal pattern, dental procumbency, or facial type. These findings indicate that establishment of an optimal horizontal anterior teeth relationship is the key to improving the smile characteristics in different types of malocclusion.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(1):31-38]
참고문헌 (30)
- O'Doherty J, "Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness", Neuropsychologia, 41, pp.147~155 (2003)
- Schmidt KL, "Signal characteristics of spontaneous facial expressions: automatic movement in solitary and social smiles", Biol Psychol, 65, pp.49~66 (2003)
- Goldstein RE, "Study of need for esthetics in dentistry", J Prosthet Dent, 21, pp.589~598 (1969)
- Sarver DM, "The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 120, pp.98~111 (2001)
- Ackerman JL, "A morphometric analysis of the posed smile", Clin Orthod Res, 1, pp.2~11 (1998)
- Frush JP, "The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept", J Prosthet Dent, 8, pp.558~581 (1958)
- Hulsey CM, "An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile", Am J Orthod, 57, pp.132~144 (1970)
- Akyalcin S, "Analysis of smile esthetics in American Board of Orthodontic patients", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.486~491 (2014)
- Krishnan V, "Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.515~523 (2008)
- Kiekens RM, "Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to “ideal"ratios and angles", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.188.e1~188.e8 (2008)
- Yu X, "Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion: a machine-learning technique employing Procrustes", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.410~416 (2014)
- Havens DC, "The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.322~328 (2010)
- Chang CA, "Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.e171~e180 (2011)
- Springer NC, "Smile esthetics from the layperson's perspective", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.e91~e101 (2011)
- Schabel BJ, "Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135(4Suppl), pp.S72~S79 (2009)
- Dahlberg G, "Statistical methods for medical and biological students", Br Med J, 2, pp.358~359 (1940)
- Campbell CM, "The effect of increased overjet on the magnitude and reproducibility of smiling in adult females", Eur J Orthod, 34, pp.640~645 (2012)
- Torrance GW, "Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal", J Health Econ, 5, pp.1~30 (1986)
- Pinho S, "Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.748~753 (2007)
- Sarver DM, "Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.116~127 (2003)
- Lan HW, "Changes in the smile after orthodontic treatment", Chin Dent J, 26, pp.17~25 (2006)
- Grippaudo C, "Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion", Prog Orthod, 14, pp.43~ (2013)
- Giuntini V, "Mesial rotation of upper first molars in Class II division 1 malocclusion in the mixed dentition: a controlled blind study", Prog Orthod, 12, pp.107~113 (2011)
- Islam R, "Lip morphological changes in orthodontic treatment. Class II division 1: malocclusion and normal occlusion at rest and on smiling", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.256~264 (2009)
- Ackerman MB, "An evaluation of dynamic lip-tooth characteristics during speech and smile in adolescents", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.43~50 (2004)
- Sarver DM, "Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.4~12 (2003)
- Van Der Geld P, "Tooth display and lip position during spontaneous and posed smiling in adults", Acta Odontol Scand, 66, pp.207~213 (2008)
- Schabel BJ, "Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.490~496 (2010)
- Ackerman MB, "Smile analysis and design in the digital era", J Clin Orthod, 36, pp.221~236 (2002)
- Celik E, "Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis", Eur J Orthod, 31, pp.241~246 (2009)