본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Differences in the heritability of craniofacial skeletal and dental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and II malocclusions

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: To investigate differences in the heritability of skeletodental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions. Methods: Forty Korean adult twin pairs were divided into Class I (C-I) group (0° ≤ angle between point A, nasion, and point B [ANB]) ≤ 4°; mean age, 40.7 years) and Class II (C-II) group (ANB > 4°; mean age, 43.0 years). Each group comprised 14 monozygotic and 6 dizygotic twin pairs. Thirty-three cephalometric variables were measured using lateral cephalograms and were categorized as the anteroposterior, vertical, dental, mandible, and cranial base characteristics. The ACE model was used to calculate heritability (A > 0.7, high heritability). Thereafter, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. Results: Twin pairs in C-I group exhibited high heritability values in the facial anteroposterior characteristics, inclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, mandibular body length, and cranial base angles. Twin pairs in C-II group showed high heritability values in vertical facial height, ramus height, effective mandibular length, and cranial base length. PCA extracted eight components with 88.3% in the C-I group and seven components with 91.0% cumulative explanation in the C-II group. Conclusions: Differences in the heritability of skeletodental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and II malocclusions might provide valuable information for growth prediction and treatment planning.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate differences in the heritability of skeletodental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions. Methods: Forty Korean adult twin pairs were divided into Class I (C-I) group (0° ≤ angle between point A, nasion, and point B [ANB]) ≤ 4°; mean age, 40.7 years) and Class II (C-II) group (ANB > 4°; mean age, 43.0 years). Each group comprised 14 monozygotic and 6 dizygotic twin pairs. Thirty-three cephalometric variables were measured using lateral cephalograms and were categorized as the anteroposterior, vertical, dental, mandible, and cranial base characteristics. The ACE model was used to calculate heritability (A > 0.7, high heritability). Thereafter, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. Results: Twin pairs in C-I group exhibited high heritability values in the facial anteroposterior characteristics, inclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, mandibular body length, and cranial base angles. Twin pairs in C-II group showed high heritability values in vertical facial height, ramus height, effective mandibular length, and cranial base length. PCA extracted eight components with 88.3% in the C-I group and seven components with 91.0% cumulative explanation in the C-II group. Conclusions: Differences in the heritability of skeletodental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and II malocclusions might provide valuable information for growth prediction and treatment planning.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Ricketts RM, "The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development", Angle Orthod, 30, pp.103~133 (1960)
  2. Ricketts RM, "A principle of arcial growth of the mandible", Angle Orthod, 42, pp.368~386 (1972)
  3. Johnston LE, "A simplified approach to prediction", Am J Orthod, 67, pp.253~257 (1975)
  4. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics, "The first fifty years", Angle Orthod, 51, pp.115~150 (1981)
  5. Nakasima A, "Hereditary factors in the craniofacial morphology of Angle's Class II and Class III malocclusions", Am J Orthod, 82, pp.150~156 (1982)
  6. Lundström A, "A comparison of vertical and horizontal cephalometric variables with regard to heritability", Eur J Orthod, 9, pp.104~108 (1987)
  7. Fishman L. Maturational development, "eds. Early orthodontic treatment" (2000), Quintessence;
  8. Barbosa LAG, "Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, pp.914~920 (2017)
  9. Bouchard TJ, "Propping P. Twins as a tool of behavioral genetics" (1993), Wiley;
  10. Neale MC, "Cardon LR. Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families" (1992), Kluwer Academic Publishers;
  11. Martin N, "A twin-pronged attack on complex traits", Nat Genet, 17, pp.387~392 (1997)
  12. Hunter WS, "A study of the inheritance of craniofacial characteristics as seen in lateral cephalograms of 72 like-sexed twins", Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc, 41, pp.59~70 (1965)
  13. Nakata M, "Genetic determinants of cranio-facial morphology : a twin study", Ann Hum Genet, 37, pp.431~443 (1974)
  14. Manfredi C, "Heritability of 39 orthodontic cephalometric parameters on MZ, DZ twins and MN-paired singletons", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.44~51 (1997)
  15. Savoye I, "A genetic study of anteroposterior and vertical facial proportions using model-fitting", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.467~470 (1998)
  16. Carels C, "A quantitative genetic study of cephalometric variables in twins", Clin Orthod Res, 4, pp.130~140 (2001)
  17. Peng J, "Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins : a semilongitudinal cephalometric study", Eur J Orthod, 27, pp.556~561 (2005)
  18. Amini F, "Heritability of dental and skeletal cephalometric variables in monozygous and dizygous Iranian twins", Orthod Waves, 68, pp.72~79 (2009)
  19. Šidlauskas M, "Heritability of mandibular cephalometric variables in twins with completed craniofacial growth", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.493~502 (2016)
  20. Kim E, "Heritability of facial skeletal and dental characteristics of monozygotic and dizygotic twins using cephalometric analysis and Falconer's method", J Craniofac Surg, 29, pp.e274~9 (2018)
  21. Jeongmin Song, "Influence of heritability on craniofacial soft tissue characteristics of monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, and their siblings using Falconer’s method and principal components analysis", 대한치과교정학회지, 49(1), pp.3~11 (2019), 대한치과교정학회[DOI]
  22. Kim DK, "Differences in heritability of craniofacial skeletal and dental characteristics between hypo-and hyper-divergent patterns using Falconer's method and principal component analysis", Angle Orthod, 89, pp.242~251 (2019)
  23. Javaras KN, "Fitting ACE structural equation models to case-control family data", Genet Epidemiol, 34, pp.238~245 (2010)
  24. Harris EF, "Heritability of craniometric and occlusal variables : a longitudinal sib analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 99, pp.258~268 (1991)
  25. Nascimento GC, "How can I explore high-dimensional data", Dental Press J Orthod, 19, pp.14~15 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Influence of heritability on craniofacial soft tissue characteristics of monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, and their siblings using Falconer’s method and principal components analysisHwa Sung Chae, Jeongmin Song, Jeong Won Shin, Joohon Sung, Seung-Hak Baek, Young Ho Kim, Yun-Mi Song대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2019 · 제49권 제1호한국인 하악전돌증환자의 유전적 영향과 유전율에 대한 분석김군종, 김영호, 김휘영, 백승학, 백채환, 서영주, 이아영, 조한영, 팽준영, 홍종락대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2010 · 제36권 제6호Covariance patterns between ramus morphology and the rest of the face: A geometric morphometric studyDemetrios J. Halazonetis, Marietta Krüsi, Theodore Eliades, Vasiliki Koretsi대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2023 · 제53권 제3호Ⅲ급 부정교합에서 두개안면 형태와 지문의 유전성향 분석백형선, 오태경대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2004 · 제34권 제4호Relationship between the maxillofacial skeletal pattern and the morphology of the mandibular symphysis: Structural equation modeling김용일, Ching-Chang Ko, Koutaro Maki, Mi So Ahn, Sang Min Shin, Te-Ju Wu, Tetsutaro Yamaguchi대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2019 · 제49권 제3호골격성 하악전돌증 환자의 유전적 경향에 대한 분석권대근, 김현수, 이상한, 이창환대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2006 · 제32권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)