韩国中高级汉语学习者“遗漏”偏误情况的考察及教学建议
An Investigation on the Errors of “omission” in Chinese Writing of Korean Middle and Advanced Chinese Learners
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文定量定性地整理分析了近五万字韩国学生写作语料中的“遗漏偏误”。根据语料情况,韩国学习者“遗漏”偏误出现的情况主要包括:“主语遗漏”偏误,谓语和宾语遗漏,定语、状语和补语部分成分的遗漏,副词、连词和助词的遗漏. 其中“主语遗漏”和“助词遗漏”是偏误数量最多的两类,而其中又尤以“主语遗漏”为最多。通过进一步具体考察“主语遗漏”偏误,我们发现第一人称代词做主语是不同水平韩国学习者都最易出现的遗漏偏误,而整个句子遗漏主语和前后小句主语转换情况下遗漏后一小句主语的情况则更多地发生在汉语水平相对来说较低的未留过学的韩国学习者身上。其次,在副词、连词和助词词语遗漏偏误中,我们着重考察了位居遗漏偏误数量第二位的助词“了”,“的”遗漏情况。结合其他学者的研究成果,我们认为韩国学习者汉语中介语体系里有遗漏动态助词“了1”,结构助词“的1”,冗余语气助词“了2”,“的2”的偏误规律。最后,我们分析了造成韩国学习者“遗漏”偏误产生的原因并提出了相应的教学建议。
Abstract
Based on personal teaching practice, this paper analyzes and investigates nearly 50000 words of Korean students’ writing corpus collected in Chinese writing class. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis, we find that “substitution” error and “omission” error are the two largest types of errors in the corpus. This paper mainly studies the errors of “omission”. According to the corpus, Korean Learners’ omission errors mainly include: subject omission, predicate and object omission, attribute, adverbial and complement omission, adverb, conjunction and auxiliary omission. Among them, “subject omission” and “auxiliary omission” are the two categories with the largest number of errors, especially “subject omission”. By further examining the subject omission errors, we find that the first person pronoun as the subject is the most likely subject omission for Korean learners of all different levels, while the omission of the subject in the whole sentence and the omission of the subject in the next clause in the case of the subject conversion are more likely to occur for Korean learners of lower level. Secondly, in the omission errors of adverbs, conjunctions and auxiliary words, we focus on the omission of “Le” and “de” in the omission errors of auxiliary words. Combined with the research of other scholars, we think that Korean learners tend to omit the dynamic auxiliary “le1”, on the contrary, the modal auxiliary “le2” tends to have redundant errors. For the omission of “de”, the structural auxiliary “de1” is more prone to omission errors, and the modal auxiliary “de2” is more prone to redundancy errors. Finally, we analyze the causes of Korean Learners’ omission errors and put forward corresponding teaching suggestions.
참고문헌 (36)
- 胡壮麟, "语篇的衔接与连贯" (1994), 上海外语教育出版社
- 鲁健骥, "中介语理论与外国人学习汉语的语音偏误分析", 语言教学与研究, (3) (1984)
- 鲁健骥, "外国人汉语词语偏误分析", 语言教学与研究, (4) (1987)
- 鲁健骥, "外国人汉语语法偏误分析", 语言教学与研究, (1) (1994)
- 肖奚强, "韩国学生汉语语法偏误分析", 世界汉语教学, (2)통권 : 52 (2000)
- 肖奚强, "外国学生照应偏误分析——偏误分析论丛之三", 汉语学习, (1) (2001)
- 肖奚强, "略论偏误分析的基本原则", 语言文字应用, (1) (2001)
- 肖奚强, "汉语中介语研究论略", 语言文字应用, (2) (2011)
- 辛 平, "对11 篇留学生汉语作文中篇误的统计分析及对汉语写作课教学的思考", 汉语学习, (4) (2001)
- 黄玉花, "韩国留学生的篇章篇误分析", 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (5) (2005)
- 高宁慧, "留学生的代词偏误与代词在篇章中的使用原则", 世界汉语教学, (2) (1996)
- 涛 亚, "对外汉语语段教学的重点—衔接", 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版) (2000)
- 田 然, "现代汉语叙事语篇中NP 的省略", 汉语学习, (6) (2003)
- 田 然, "近二十年汉语语篇研究述评", 汉语学习, (1) (2005)
- 张宝林, "语段的语义中心的获取及表现形式", 语言教学与研究, (3) (2001)
- 曹秀玲, "韩国留学生语篇指称现象考察", 世界汉语教学, (4) (2000)
- 朱堪宇, "汉语零形回指的句法驱动力", 汉语学习, (8) (2002)
- 陈 晨, "英语国家学生中高级汉语篇章衔接考察", 汉语学习, (1) (2005)
- 车晓庚, "中高级汉语写作成分残缺偏误调查与分析", 语言文化, (302) (2013)
- 祁 峰, "基于中介语语料库的留学生动态助词偏误研究", 对外汉语研究, (2) (2016)
- 刘建霞, "韩国留学生叙事语篇中名词性词语省略的偏误分析", 硕士, pp.2005
- 姜贞爱, "汉韩政论体语篇的省略和指称衔接对比", 硕士, pp.2006
- 曾丽娟, "中级水平韩国留学生语篇回指表现分析", 硕士, pp.2007
- 付涟川, "基于语料库的韩国学生语篇衔接偏误分析及语篇写作教学建议", 硕士, pp.2012
- 朴妍芝, "韩国大学中文系中级汉语写作课教学设计", 硕士, pp.2012
- 崔贤美, "针对韩国留学生的汉语写作教学研究", 硕±, pp.2011
- 李 洋, "基于HSK动态作文语料库的韩国留学生动态助词研究", 硕士, pp.2013
- 金贤姬, "汉韩语言认知视点的对比研究—从主语及话题生命度的角度", 博士, pp.2016
- 钟明月, "留学生习得语气词“的” “了”偏误分析及教学研", 硕士, pp.2016
- 张培培, "结构助词“的、地、得”在汉语习得过程中的偏误分析及教学对策", 硕士, pp.2016
- 尹秀景, "韩国学生结果补语习得情况考察", 硕士, pp.2017
- 王世群, "汉语框式介词研究", 博士, pp.2013
- 李甲男, "汉韩主语和话题对比研究", 博士, pp.2014
- 李 晶, "简论韩国留学生的汉语写作偏误及其教学", 硕士, pp.2016
- 刘琳萍, "韩国留学生写作中主语残缺问题研究—基于HSK动态作文语料库", 硕士, pp.2016
- 陈 盼, "留学生汉语习得中主语成分的残缺和多余类偏误分析", 硕士, pp.2017
