NATO:Adaptation and Relevance for the 21st Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
NATO’s demise has been much heralded, dismissed by many as a remnant of the Cold War era, with no role in today’s complex security environment. Institutionally, the Alliance has endured beyond expected norms, evolving to remain relevant. This paper examines thematically how the Alliance has developed, through the prisms of its institutions, capabilities and political will. Analysing the areas of international relations and institutional theory, it establishes that NATO remains relevant. Whilst the Alliance is more flexible than it is perceived, enlargement has brought a divergence of views amongst members, which has led to particular tensions in burden-sharing and willingness to face risk, as highlighted in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. Whilst this dissonance continues, there is little prospect of NATO challenging the UN in terms of legitimate intervention. The process of change must continue.
Abstract
NATO’s demise has been much heralded, dismissed by many as a remnant of the Cold War era, with no role in today’s complex security environment. Institutionally, the Alliance has endured beyond expected norms, evolving to remain relevant. This paper examines thematically how the Alliance has developed, through the prisms of its institutions, capabilities and political will. Analysing the areas of international relations and institutional theory, it establishes that NATO remains relevant. Whilst the Alliance is more flexible than it is perceived, enlargement has brought a divergence of views amongst members, which has led to particular tensions in burden-sharing and willingness to face risk, as highlighted in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. Whilst this dissonance continues, there is little prospect of NATO challenging the UN in terms of legitimate intervention. The process of change must continue.
참고문헌 (33)
- Chalmers, Malcolm, "Sharing Security: The Political Economy of Burdensharing" (2000), Macmillan Press
- Chalmers, Malcolm, "The Atlantic burden-sharing debate – widening or fragmenting?", International Affairs, 77(3), pp.569~585 (2001)
- Clark, Wesley K, "Waging Modern War" (2001), Public Affairs
- De Wijk, Rob, "NATO On The Brink of The New Millennium" (1997), Brassey’s
- "Germany Steps Away from European Unity" (2011)[URL]
- Farrell, Theo, "NATO’s Transformation Gaps: Transatlantic Differences and the War in Afghanistan", The Journal of Strategic Studies, 33(5), pp.673~699 (2010)
- Forster, Anthony, "What Is NATO For?", Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 43(4), pp.107~122 (2001)
- Forster, Peter, "The US, NATO and Military Burden-Sharing" (2005), Frank Cass
- Gray, Colin S, "Another Bloody Century: Future Warfare" (2006), Phoenix
- Hallams, Ellen, "Towards a ‘Post-American’ Alliance? NATO Burden-Sharing after Libya", International Affairs, 88(2), pp.313~327 (2012)
- Hartley, Keith, "NATO Burden-Sharing : Past and Future", Journal of Peace Research, 36(6), pp.665~680 (1999)
- Kaplan, Lawrence S, "NATO Divided, NATO United : The Evolution of an Alliance" (2004), Praeger
- Menon, Rajan, "The End of Alliances" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Menon, Anand, "Understanding NATO’s Sustainability : The Limits of Institutionalist Theory", Global Governance, 17, pp.81~94 (2011)
- Michaels, Jeffrey H, "NATO after Libya: Alliance Adrift?", The RUSI Journal, 156(6), pp.56~61 (2011)
- Michel, Leo G, "NATO Decisionmaking: Au Revoir to the Consensus Rule?", Strategic Forum, 202, pp.2~8 (2003)
- "NATO must heal its wounds over Iraq, Says Bush" (2003)[URL]
- "The Harmel Report/." (2013)[URL]
- "North Atlantic Treaty Organisation" (2013)[URL]
- Noetzel, Timo, "Does a Multi-tier NATO Matter? The Atlantic Alliance and the Process of Strategic Change", International Affairs, 85(2), pp.211~226 (2009)
- Olson, Mancur Jr, "An Economic Theory of Alliances", RAND, 1~38 (1966)
- "OMRI Daily Digest." (1995)[URL]
- "Syrian ‘Stalemate’ Shows UN ‘Not Fit for Purpose’, Says Head of General Assembly" (2012)[URL]
- Rasmussen, Anders F, "NATO after Libya", Foreign Affairs, 90(4), pp.2~6 (2011)
- Ringsmore, Jens, "NATO Burden-Sharing Redux : Continuity and Change after the Cold War", Contemporary Security Policy, 31(2), pp.319~338 (2010)
- Heroes: Britain, France and the Libyan Operation, "Royal United Services Institute", RUSI, ~ (2011)
- Schwarz, Rolf, "NATO and Prevention of State Failure: An Idea Whose Time Will Come?", Contemporary Security Policy, 31(2), pp.339~362 (2010)
- Sloan, Stanley R, "NATO, The European Union and the Atlantic Community" (2005), Rowman & Littlefield
- Smith, Mark, "NATO Enlargement During The Cold War" (2000), Palgrave
- Thies, Wallace J, "Friendly Rivals: Bargaining and Burden-Shifting in NATO" (2003), M.E. Sharpe
- "What Libya Says about the Future of the Transatlantic Alliance" (2011)[URL]
- "Don’t Call It a Comeback; Four Reasons Why Libya Doesn’t Equal Success for NATO" (2011)[URL]
- Wallander, Celeste A, "Institutional Assets and Adaptability : NATO after the Cold War", International Organization, 54(4), pp.705~735 (2000)