Embedding Ballistic Missile Defence into the New Strategic Concept of NATO
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
NATO’s endorsement of the Obama Administration’s European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) has been one of the most strategically important decisions made in recent years. The EPAA involves a gradual deployment of increasingly advanced missile defence systems not only in Eastern Europe but across all of Europe over the course of a decade. NATO’s support for such systems prompted a series of reactions from the Russian government as well as within NATO itself. The significance of this plan brought back to the table an idea that NATO had agreed upon in 2005: the expanded development of a European ‘Active Layer Theatre Ballistic Missile Defence’ (ALTBMD) system. With growing concerns over unpredictable threats alongside ongoing concerns about insufficiencies in current BMD capacities, now firmly on NATO’s agenda, the alliance faces important decisions over how to proceed. Failure to reach an agreement could result in the weakening of an already divided alliance and undermine the alliance’s commitment to collective defence. This paper analyses the role BMD and ALTBMD in shaping NATO’s ongoing relevance; whether this is a policy area that should remain prominent in NATO’s strategic concept or whether it is an endeavour destined to waste limited NATO resources at a time of global financial constraint.
Abstract
NATO’s endorsement of the Obama Administration’s European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) has been one of the most strategically important decisions made in recent years. The EPAA involves a gradual deployment of increasingly advanced missile defence systems not only in Eastern Europe but across all of Europe over the course of a decade. NATO’s support for such systems prompted a series of reactions from the Russian government as well as within NATO itself. The significance of this plan brought back to the table an idea that NATO had agreed upon in 2005: the expanded development of a European ‘Active Layer Theatre Ballistic Missile Defence’ (ALTBMD) system. With growing concerns over unpredictable threats alongside ongoing concerns about insufficiencies in current BMD capacities, now firmly on NATO’s agenda, the alliance faces important decisions over how to proceed. Failure to reach an agreement could result in the weakening of an already divided alliance and undermine the alliance’s commitment to collective defence. This paper analyses the role BMD and ALTBMD in shaping NATO’s ongoing relevance; whether this is a policy area that should remain prominent in NATO’s strategic concept or whether it is an endeavour destined to waste limited NATO resources at a time of global financial constraint.
참고문헌 (49)
- "2010 Ballistic Missile Defence Review (BMDR) Fact Sheet", ~ (2010)
- Adams, Benson D, "Ballistic Missile Defense" (1971), Barking Elsevier
- "Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Test Successful" (2009)[URL]
- "Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NATO Secretary General" (2010)[URL]
- Aybet, Gulnur, "NATO in Search of a Vision" (2010), George Washington University press
- "Russia and U.S. Sign Nuclear Arms Reduction Pact" (2010)[URL]
- Binnedijik, Hans, "Toward Missile Defenses from the Sea", Defense Horizons, 14 (2002)
- Booth, Ken, "Strategy and Ethnocentrism" (1979), Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc
- Booth, Ken, "Theory of World Security" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Bowen, Wyn, "The Politics of Ballistic Missile Proliferation" (2000), Macmillan Press LTD
- "NATO emphasizes defense spending despite crisis" (2010)[URL]
- "The Star Wars Debate: Ballistic Missile Defense: The Illusion of Security" (1984)[URL]
- Clausewitz, Carl von, "On War" (1976), Princeton University Press
- Codner, Michael, "Missile Defence: What the Obama Aministration’s change of Policy means for Europe and the United Kingdom", The RUSI Journal, pp.154~155 (2009)
- Cornish, Paul, "Beyond the UE", NATO dichotomy: the beginnings of a European strategic culture, 2001, pp.77(3), ~
- Dubriske, Steven D.., "Ballistic Missile Defense in Poland: Did the Costs Outweigh the Benefits?", Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 12(2), pp.95~102 (2013)
- "Officials consider European home ports" (2010)[URL]
- Forster, Peter, "The US, NATO and Military Burden-Sharing" (2005), Frank Cass
- Freedman, Lawrence, "Deterrence" (2004), Polity Press
- "The Phased Adaptive Approach: Integration of the EPAA and ALTBMD" (2013)[URL]
- Gardner, H, "NATO and the European Union" (2004), Ashgate
- Gray, Colin, "Another Bloody Century : Future Warfare" (2006), Phoenix
- Hildreth, Steven, "Ballistic Missile Defence: Historical Overview", CRS Report for Congress (2007)
- Jasper, Ursula, "EU Defense Integration and Nuclear Weapons", Security Dialogue, 41(2), pp.164~ (2010)
- LaGrone, Sam, "Shipshape" (2010), Janes Defence World
- Lapid, Y., "The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory" (1996), Lynne Riener
- Lord, Carnes, "American Strategic Culture. National Institute for Public Policy", Comparative Strategy, 5(3) (1985)
- "Missile Defence" (2010)[URL]
- "NATO experts set out new strategic blueprint" (2010)[URL]
- "NATO glossary of terms and definitions for military use" (2000), NATO
- "NATO Handbook" (2006), Public Diplomacy Division, NATO
- "Lualualei, HI Naval Magazine Pearl Harbor"[URL]
- "New Concerns over Chinese ‘Carrier-Killer’" (2009)[URL]
- Office of the Secretary of Defence, "Proliferation: Threat and Response", pp.16~17 (1996), US Printing Office
- O’Rourke, Ronald, "Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress", CRS Report for Congress (2010)
- O’Rourke, Ronald, "Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress", CRS Report for Congress (2013)
- International Missile Defence? Opportunities, Challenges and Implications for Europe, "Ranger, Robin", RUSI, ~, pp.Whitehall Paper 55 (2002)
- "Building a Euro-Atlantic Security Architecture" (2010)[URL]
- "Meeting Future Challenges together" (2010)[URL]
- "Standard Missile-3: Missile Defense from the Sea. Raytheon Naval Weapons Systems fact sheet"[URL]
- Stocker, Jeremy, "Britain and ballistic missile defence, 1942-2002" (2004), Frank Cass
- Stocker, Jeremy, "Missile defence in a new strategic environment : policy, architecture and international industrial co-operation after the ABM Treaty" (2003), Royal United Services Institute
- Missile Defence in a New Strategic Environment, "Stocker, Jeremy", RUSI, ~, pp.Whitehall paper 60 (2003)
- "The Alliance’s New Strategic Concept" (1991)[URL]
- The Future of NATO and European Defence, , House of Commons Defence Committee, ~, pp.Ninth Report Session 2007-8 (2008)
- Wachendorf, Ben, "The First Line of Defense", US Naval Institute Proceedings (2009)
- "The Great Debate: Is Nuclear Zero the best option?" (2012)[URL]
- "Who free-rides on American military power?" (2010)[URL]