일본어 수동표현의 한국어 대응 양상–지다形를 중심으로-
Korean equivalents of Japanese passives - focusing on -jida type translation -
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper targets to identify Korean equivalents of Japanese passives, focusing on 250 examples of -jida (meaning becoming) type translation. 250 examples of ラレル type equivalents are classified into 9 categories, with the ratio of 25(19.8%), 22(17.7%), respectively, for -jida type equivalents, and the share is found not to be significantly big. Further focusing on Korean translations of -e type and -jida type, subjects and agents of ST, or Source Text, sentences are divided into animate/inanimate, respectively, to analyze specific conditions or linguistic contexts for different combination. The analysis shows that -e type translation is possible regardless of subject classification and -jida type tends to be possible mostly for sentences with inanimate subjects and the relevant verbs do not have -e type verb inflection. Through these analyses, it can be concluded that -jida passives correspond to ラレル type as a support for -e type in sentences with inanimate subjects. The analysis continues concentrating on -jida type-only equivalents. Targeting to identify the influence the agent has on the object, the subjects and the agents are divided into animate/inanimate, with the agents further sub-classified. In inanimate-subject sentences, agents are the following: a. a majority of people or groups of people b. general people c. person or natural phenomena with no need for identifying, for (-/+) sentences. Natural phenomena and causes for (-/-) sentences, implying lack of activity on the part of the subject, unconscious of the agent. Further, in animate-subject sentences, the agents are a. general people and b. animate agent with no concrete action implied for (+/+) sentences, and causes for (-/-) sentences. In consideration of features of animate-subject sentences, the sentences share certain characteristics with inanimate-subject sentences; the agents do not show any direct or concrete action in the realization of the event. -jida translations produce expressions in combination with emotive adjectives, which can be still carried into passives. Sentences denoting the subject’s voluntary psychological change can have translation equivalents of -jida, and it’s because -jida type expresses psychological change of the animate subject.
Abstract
This paper targets to identify Korean equivalents of Japanese passives, focusing on 250 examples of -jida (meaning becoming) type translation. 250 examples of ラレル type equivalents are classified into 9 categories, with the ratio of 25(19.8%), 22(17.7%), respectively, for -jida type equivalents, and the share is found not to be significantly big. Further focusing on Korean translations of -e type and -jida type, subjects and agents of ST, or Source Text, sentences are divided into animate/inanimate, respectively, to analyze specific conditions or linguistic contexts for different combination. The analysis shows that -e type translation is possible regardless of subject classification and -jida type tends to be possible mostly for sentences with inanimate subjects and the relevant verbs do not have -e type verb inflection. Through these analyses, it can be concluded that -jida passives correspond to ラレル type as a support for -e type in sentences with inanimate subjects. The analysis continues concentrating on -jida type-only equivalents. Targeting to identify the influence the agent has on the object, the subjects and the agents are divided into animate/inanimate, with the agents further sub-classified. In inanimate-subject sentences, agents are the following: a. a majority of people or groups of people b. general people c. person or natural phenomena with no need for identifying, for (-/+) sentences. Natural phenomena and causes for (-/-) sentences, implying lack of activity on the part of the subject, unconscious of the agent. Further, in animate-subject sentences, the agents are a. general people and b. animate agent with no concrete action implied for (+/+) sentences, and causes for (-/-) sentences. In consideration of features of animate-subject sentences, the sentences share certain characteristics with inanimate-subject sentences; the agents do not show any direct or concrete action in the realization of the event. -jida translations produce expressions in combination with emotive adjectives, which can be still carried into passives. Sentences denoting the subject’s voluntary psychological change can have translation equivalents of -jida, and it’s because -jida type expresses psychological change of the animate subject.
참고문헌 (23)
- 工藤真由美, "アスペクト․テンス体系とテクスト" (1995), ひつじ書房
- 權奇洙, "日․韓両国語の受身表現の関わり合いについて-主に両国語の受身表現の対応しないものを中心にー", 일어일문학, 22 (2004), 대한일어일문학회
- 김현숙, "일본어 수동표현의 한국어의 대응 양상-능동표현을 중심으로-", 인문사회과학연구, 22(2), pp.185~214 (2021), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
- 北村唯司, "한국어 피동 표현 연구" (2004), J&C
- 성광수, "국어 의사 피동문", 논문집, 4 (1976), 관동대학교
- 小泉 保 他, "日本語基本動詞用法辞書" (1989), 大修館書店
- 송창선, "현대국어 피동접미사의 특성", 국어교육연구, 36 (2004), 국어교육학회
- 양경모, "한･일어 수동 표현의 비교 고찰 - 일본어 「Vーられる」와 한국어 {이} 피동사 및 {V-어지다}의 대응 관계의 성격 -", 비교일본학, 41, pp.309~330 (2017), 일본학국제비교연구소
- 우인혜, "우리말 피동연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 兪長玉, "韓․日 両国語의 受動表現에 関한 対照研究" (2005), J&C
- 이익섭, "국어 문법론 강의" (1999), 학연사
- 이정택, "현대 국어 피동연구" (2004), 도서출판 박이정
- 林憲燦, "日韓両言語における受動文と使役文-ヴォイスのカテゴリーの観点から" (2003), J&C
- 정의상, "일본어 수동의 한국어 비수동 번역 양상에 관한 고찰 - 일본드라마 자막번역의 사례분석을 중심으로 -", 비교일본학, 31, pp.263~294 (2014), 일본학국제비교연구소
- 千英子, "現代日本語の文学作品における受身文の研究-韓国語との対応関係分析を中心として-", 紀要人文科学, 56 (2006), 和歌山大学教育学部
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1978), 정음사
- "用jp: 用例․例文検索エンジン"[URL]
- 片山 恭一, "世界の中心で、愛を叫ぶ" (2001), 小学館
- 안중식, "세상의 중심에서 사랑을 외치다" (2004)
- 小川洋子, "博士が愛した数学" (2005), 新潮文庫
- 김난주, "박사가 사랑한 수식" (2014), 현대문학
- 村上春木, "1Q84-2" (2009), 新潮
- 양윤옥, "1Q84-2" (2009), 문학동네