본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

페루 채굴반대운동과 정치적 기회구조

Anti-extractivist Movement and Political Opportunity Structure in Peru

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

Anti-extractivist movements in Peru have been characterized as limited in scope and space, occurring mostly around high altitude Andes villages near the mining sites and in the middle of the rainforest. Though the extractive disputes have been numerous and persistent since 2000, numerous anti-extractivist movements could not expand beyond local boundaries, which is basically for two reasons. First, anti-mining movements could not build a nation-wide alliance network due to their lack of economic or environmental interests in common with other sectors and areas. Second, the political opportunity structure has been unfavourable to the small voices of the peasants from the remote and isolated mountain areas. While there could be many explanations for the weakness of anti-extractivist movements in Peru, this paper focuses on the political opportunity structure as the most relevant approach. I pay special attention to the reason anti-mining movement, it being the most prominent source of social conflict in Peru, and which proved to be unable to achieve any real change in the mining policy of the government. I focus on three main sources of political opportunity structure which were unfavourable to the anti-mining movement: 1) the authoritarian elite control of the state, 2) weak political institutions that disempower formal democracy, and 3) a weak civil society. More specifically, authoritarian exercise of the power by the state, the class nature of the neoliberal state, the fragmented party politics, an ineffective and weak democracy, a weak civil society, and the resulting lack of indigenous/peasant voices in Peru have resulted in closed opportunity for the required reform of the extractive sector. It would be necessary to develop a more democratic and responsive state and a more effective political party system with a more autonomous and mature civil society, in order to contribute to more effective policy reform, reduced socio-environmental conflicts and a more dynamic and stable economy in Peru.

Abstract

Anti-extractivist movements in Peru have been characterized as limited in scope and space, occurring mostly around high altitude Andes villages near the mining sites and in the middle of the rainforest. Though the extractive disputes have been numerous and persistent since 2000, numerous anti-extractivist movements could not expand beyond local boundaries, which is basically for two reasons. First, anti-mining movements could not build a nation-wide alliance network due to their lack of economic or environmental interests in common with other sectors and areas. Second, the political opportunity structure has been unfavourable to the small voices of the peasants from the remote and isolated mountain areas. While there could be many explanations for the weakness of anti-extractivist movements in Peru, this paper focuses on the political opportunity structure as the most relevant approach. I pay special attention to the reason anti-mining movement, it being the most prominent source of social conflict in Peru, and which proved to be unable to achieve any real change in the mining policy of the government. I focus on three main sources of political opportunity structure which were unfavourable to the anti-mining movement: 1) the authoritarian elite control of the state, 2) weak political institutions that disempower formal democracy, and 3) a weak civil society. More specifically, authoritarian exercise of the power by the state, the class nature of the neoliberal state, the fragmented party politics, an ineffective and weak democracy, a weak civil society, and the resulting lack of indigenous/peasant voices in Peru have resulted in closed opportunity for the required reform of the extractive sector. It would be necessary to develop a more democratic and responsive state and a more effective political party system with a more autonomous and mature civil society, in order to contribute to more effective policy reform, reduced socio-environmental conflicts and a more dynamic and stable economy in Peru.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Aguilar, Carlos, "Sourthern Alternatives to EU Trade Policy" (2012), Comhlámh
  2. Arce, Moisés, "Resource Extraction and Protest in Peru" (2014), University of Pittsburgh Press
  3. Bebbington, Anthony, "Mineria, moviementos sociales y respuestas campesinas" (2007), IEP
  4. Bebbington, "Minería y desarrollo en el Perú: con especial referencia al Proyecto Río Blanco" (2007), Oxfam International
  5. Benford, R.D., "Framing Processes and Social Movements:An Overview and Assessment", Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), pp.611~639 (2000)
  6. Bland, G., "Democratization through Contention? Regional and Local Governance Conflict in Peru", Latin American Politics and Society, 56(1), pp.73~97 (2014)
  7. "Los frentes de defensa de los intereses del pueblo, su origen, significado y vigencia"[URL]
  8. Brysk, Alison, "Democratizing Civil Society in Latin America", Journal of Democracy, 11(3), pp.151~165 (2000)
  9. Burt, Jo-Marie, "Quien habla es terrorista: The Political Use of Fear in Fujimori’s Peru", Latin American Research Review, 41(3), pp.32~62 (2006)
  10. Cotler, Julio, "Fractured Politics: Peruvian Democracy Past and Present, Institute for the Study of the Americas", pp.53~66 (2011), University of London
  11. Crabtree, J., "Peruvian Party Politics: Still some Signs of Life?", Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 58, pp.35~50 (2006), Universidad del Pacífico
  12. Crabtree, J., "Social Conflict, Economic Development and Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America", pp.46~64 (2012), Routledge
  13. Dangl, B., "Dancing with Dynamite: Social Movements and States in Latin America" (2010), AK Press
  14. Eisinger, Peter K., "The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities", American Political Science Review, 67, pp.11~28 (1973)
  15. "Can Frances Fox Piven’s Theory of Disruptive Power Create the Next Occupy?" (2014)[URL]
  16. Gudynas, Eduardo, "Extractivismo, politica y sociedad", pp.187~225 (2009), CAAP(Centro Andino de Accion Popular)y CLAES(Centro Latino Americano de Ecologia Social)
  17. Guerrero, Carlos Meléndez, "Entre el crecimiento económico y la insatisfacción social: las protestas sociales en el Perú actual" (2009), IEP
  18. Guevara, Anahí Durand, "Movimientos sociales y política en el Perú de hoy", Latino América, (58), pp.59~84 (2014), UNAM
  19. Gustafsson, Maria-Therese, "Deepening Democracy through Public Deliberation?: Reflections from the Province Huanta in the Peruvian Andes", Iberoamericana-Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, XXXIX(1-2), pp.139~165 (2009)
  20. Hilgers, Mathieu, "The Three Anthropogical Approaches to Neoliberalism", International Social Science Journal, 61(202), pp.351~364 (2011)
  21. Hilgers, Mathieu, "The Hisotricity of the Neoliberal State", Social Anthropology, 20(1), pp.80~94 (2012)
  22. Hoetmer, Raphael, "Refelxiones sobre movimientos sociales, democracia y minería en Perú", Contrapunto, pp.143~154 (2013)
  23. Ingalls, Rebekah, "Land and Livelihoods: NGOs, Conflict, and Extraction in Peru, Task Force 2015" (2015), Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies
  24. Johnston, H., "Latin American Social Movements: Globalization, Democratization, and Transnational Networks" (2006), Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
  25. Keck, Margaret E., "Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics" (1998), Cornell University Press
  26. 김달관, "에콰도르 원주민 운동의 등장배경과 변천과정: 국민국가형성부터 현재까지", 이베로아메리카 연구, 21(2), pp.25~55 (2010), 라틴아메리카연구소[DOI]
  27. Kriesi, Hanspeter, "The Blackwelll Companion to Social Movements", pp.67~90 (2004), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  28. "El frente amplio: una convivencia forzada entre aranistas y mendocistas" (2017)[URL]
  29. McAdam, Doug, "Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings", pp.23~40 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  30. McAdam, D., "Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings", pp.1~20 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  31. Monge, C., "Peru Hoy: Luces y sombras del poder", pp.137~162 (2009), Lima
  32. Panfichi, Aldo, "Fractured Politics: Peruvian Democracy Past and Present, Institute for the Study of the Americas", pp.89~104 (2011), University of London
  33. Weak Indigenous Politics in Peru, "Paredes, Maritza", (Crise: Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity), Department of International Development, University of Oxford, ~, pp.Creise Working Paper No. 33 (2008)
  34. Pinto, Vladimir, "Minería y Territorio en el Perú: Conflictos, Resistencias y Propuestas en Tiempos de Globalización", pp.87~106 (2009), Programa Democracia y Transformación Global, CONACAMI, CooperAcción, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
  35. Quijano, A., "Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America", Nepentla: Views from the South, 1(3), pp.533~580 (2000)
  36. Rochabrún, Guillermo, "Argumentos: Revista de Análysis y Crítica, edición No. 1" (2013), IEP(Instituto de Estudos Peruanos)
  37. Scholte, J. A., "Global Civil Society-opportunity or Obstacle for Democracy?", Development Dialogue, 49(3), pp.15~28 (2007)
  38. Scurrah, Martin, "Defendiendo derechos y promoviendo cambios: el estado, las empresas extractivas y las comunidades locales en el Perú", pp.69~135 (2008), IEP, Oxfam América
  39. Silva, Eduardo, "Challenging Noeoliberalism in Latin America" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  40. Stahler-Sholk, R., "Latin American Social Movements in the Twenty-first Century: Resistance, Power, and Democracy" (2008), Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
  41. Starn, O., "Maoism in the Andes: The Communist Party of Peru-shining Path and the Refusal of History", Journal of Latin American Studies, 27(2), pp.399~421 (1995)
  42. Szwarcberg, Mariela, "Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina" (2015), Cambridge University Press
  43. Tarrow, Sidney, "Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings", pp.41~61 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  44. Tilly, Charles, "Social Movements, 1768-2004" (2004), Paradigm Publishers
  45. Urteaga-Crovetto, Patricia, "The Politics of Resource Extraction:Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations and the State" (2012), Palgrave MacMillan
  46. Vergara, A., "Peru Since Fujimori", Journal of Democracy, 27(3), pp.148~157 (2016)
  47. Vergara, A., "Continuity by Surprise: Explaining Institutional Stability in Contemporary Peru", Latin American Research Review, 51(1), pp.159~180 (2016)
  48. Yashar, Deborah J., "Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and the Postliberal Challenge in Latin America", World Politics, 52(1), pp.76~104 (1999)
  49. 이상현, "사회운동과 정당정치: 볼리비아 MAS 사례를 중심으로", 라틴아메리카연구, 23(4), pp.147~168 (2010), 한국라틴아메리카학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)