본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국상사중재의 사법감독 실태와 개선방안

A Study on the Judicial Supervision of Commercial Arbitration in China and Areas in Need of Improvement

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

This thesis, which mainly focuses on judicial supervision of commercial arbitration in China, will deal with the developing process of arbitration system and analyze the actual condition of judicial supervision in commercial arbitration. And it also focuses on the underlying problems attributed to the excessive judicial intervention and an effort that the related academic world, arbitration industry and legal circles in China start to make in order to improve the system, resolving them. About the time China became a member of the WTO and about the 10th anniversary of the enforcement of Arbitration Law, powerful demands to solve the problems started to exist intensively. Academic field in China integrated these demands into the form of “proposed amendment of arbitration law”, which enhanced the independence of arbitration and the autonomy of the involved parties drastically, as it accepted major contents of UNCITRAL Model Law while preserving of original tool of Chinese arbitration system. Separately from the movement in academic field, Supreme People’s Court starts to exert itself for the improvement of arbitration system, by announcing a series of proposed judicial interpretation so that it could collect the public opinion continuously and reflect the gathered opinion in judicial interpretation efficiently. Notwithstanding, there still remains to be ameliorated that the Arbitration Law of the PRC won’t be able to overcome original limit when valuating judicial intervention on arbitration in some ways.

Abstract

This thesis, which mainly focuses on judicial supervision of commercial arbitration in China, will deal with the developing process of arbitration system and analyze the actual condition of judicial supervision in commercial arbitration. And it also focuses on the underlying problems attributed to the excessive judicial intervention and an effort that the related academic world, arbitration industry and legal circles in China start to make in order to improve the system, resolving them. About the time China became a member of the WTO and about the 10th anniversary of the enforcement of Arbitration Law, powerful demands to solve the problems started to exist intensively. Academic field in China integrated these demands into the form of “proposed amendment of arbitration law”, which enhanced the independence of arbitration and the autonomy of the involved parties drastically, as it accepted major contents of UNCITRAL Model Law while preserving of original tool of Chinese arbitration system. Separately from the movement in academic field, Supreme People’s Court starts to exert itself for the improvement of arbitration system, by announcing a series of proposed judicial interpretation so that it could collect the public opinion continuously and reflect the gathered opinion in judicial interpretation efficiently. Notwithstanding, there still remains to be ameliorated that the Arbitration Law of the PRC won’t be able to overcome original limit when valuating judicial intervention on arbitration in some ways.

참고문헌 (63)

  1. 김선정, "중국에 있어서 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행 거절 사유인 공서와 법의 지배", 중재연구, 18(3), pp.23~50 (2008), 한국중재학회
  2. 김태경, "중국상사중재에 대한 사법관여에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  3. 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2001), 박영사
  4. 목영준, "중재에 있어서 법원의 역할에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  5. 費宗褘, "중국 현행 중재제도의 결함 및 개선", 중재연구, 13(1), pp.67~72 (2003), 한국중재학회
  6. 문준조, "중국의 입법관련제도 및 입법기준에 관한 연구" (2002), 한국법제연구원
  7. 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구(제1권)" (2007), 박영사
  8. 성백영, "중화인민공화국 중재법의 내용과 문제점의 고찰", 중국법연구, 2 (1999), 한중법학회
  9. 신군재, "중국 중재제도의 특성에 관한 사례 연구", 무역학회지, 29(4), pp.211~230 (2004), 한국무역학회
  10. 오원석, "중재판정의 취소와 집행거부에 따른 실무상의 유의점", 무역상무연구, 35, pp.101~124 (2007), 한국무역상무학회
  11. 윤충원, "중국의 중재법상 중재기관 약정과 관련한 중재합의 유효요건에 관한 사례연구", 무역학회지, 32(3), pp.65~92 (2007), 한국무역학회
  12. 윤진기, "UNCITRAL示範仲裁法與中國仲裁法的比較", 중국법연구, 3 (2000), 한중법학회
  13. 윤진기, "중국 CIETAC 중재규칙상의 보전신청에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 13(2), pp.47~68 (2004), 한국중재학회
  14. 윤진기, "2005년 CIETAC 중재규칙 개정과 중국 중재법상의 문제점 개선", 중재연구, 16(3), pp.91~125 (2006), 한국중재학회
  15. 윤진기, "중재절차상의 보전조치에 관한 한중법제 비교", 기업법연구, 20(3), pp.347~376 (2006), 한국기업법학회
  16. 이시환, "중국에서의 국제상사중재판정의 승인 및 집행", 국제상학, 20(3), pp.299~319 (2005), 한국국제상학회
  17. 이시환, "중국법원의 섭외상사중재판정의 취소", 무역상무연구, 31(0), pp.107~134 (2006), 한국무역상무학회
  18. 이주원, "중국 중재제도의 특징에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 15(3), pp.113~137 (2005), 한국중재학회
  19. 차경자, "중국의 섭외 및 외국중재판정 강제집행제도 연구", 중재연구, 15(2), pp.263~292 (2005), 한국중재학회
  20. 최석범, "중국국제상사중재제도의 운용실태와 개선방안", 중재연구, 14(2), pp.135~172 (2004), 한국중재학회
  21. 허익범, "중화인민공화국 국제상사중재의 법제와 국제화 동향 연구", 박사, pp.2006
  22. 康 明, "臨時仲裁及其在我國的現狀和發展", 仲裁及法律通訊, 3 (2000)
  23. 姜 霞, "仲裁司法審査程序的目的及其實現", 長沙鐵道學院學報(社會科學版), 8(2) (2007)
  24. 高顺龄, "當代中国仲裁制度若干问题研究― 纪念仲裁法颁布10周年" (2004), 武漢出版社
  25. 顾昂然, "关於≪中华人民共和国仲裁法(草案)≫的说明-1994年6月28日在八屆全国人民代表大会常务委员会第八次会议上, 「全国人民代表大会常务委员会公報」 1994年 第6期", ~ (1994)
  26. 廣州仲裁委員會硏究所, "解讀最高人民法院 關於適用<中華人民共和國仲裁法>若干問題的解釋(徵求意見稿)", 仲裁硏究, 1 (2004)
  27. 譚 兵, "中国仲裁制度的改革與完善" (2005), 人民出版社
  28. 唐雙玲, "論我國仲裁裁決司法監督制度的不足及完善", 新疆廣播電視大學學報, 10(4) (2006)
  29. 杜煥芳, "論中國涉外仲裁裁決的撤鎖問題及其完善", 仲裁與法律, 5 (2002)
  30. 杜煥芳, "完善涉外仲裁裁决撤销制度的思考. in: 「人民法院报」 法治时代 第3版" (2004)
  31. 馬永雙, "仲裁法導論" (2007), 中國社會出版社
  32. 馬占軍, "1994年中國≪仲裁法≫修改及論證", 仲裁硏究, 8 (2006)
  33. 萬鄂湘, "我國仲裁司法監督制度的最新發展", 法學評論, 1 (2007)
  34. 武漢大學國際法硏究所≪仲裁法≫修改課題組, "中華人民共和國仲裁法≫(建議修改稿)", 仲裁硏究, 8 (2006)
  35. 傅林涌, "刍议涉外仲裁裁决司法审查结论的法律效力", 对外经贸实务, 6 (2007)
  36. 宋連斌, "七年之痒:關於涉外仲裁司法解释(征求意见稿)的幾点建議. in: 涉外仲裁司法審査" (2006), 法律出版社
  37. 宋連斌, "關於修改1994年中國≪仲裁法≫若干問題的探討", 仲裁與法律, 6 (2000)
  38. 宋連斌, "≪中華人民共和國仲裁法≫(建議修改稿)", 法學評論, 4 (2003)
  39. 沈德咏, "最高人民法院仲裁法司法解释的理解與適用" (2007), 人民法院出版社
  40. 楊曉迪, "我國涉外仲裁司法審査制度的問題與完善", 經濟硏究導刊, 15 (2007)
  41. 王秀玲, "我國涉外仲裁的司法審査及其修改與完善", 河北法學, 5 (2005)
  42. 王亚明, "试论仲裁裁决不予执行的立法完善", 北京仲裁, 64 (2008)
  43. 王紅松, "≪仲裁法≫存在的问题及修改意见", 北京仲裁, 52 (2004)
  44. 于喜富, "國際商事仲裁的司法監督與協助—兼論中國的立法與司法實踐" (2006), 知識産權出版社
  45. 刘 俊, "联合国仲裁示範法與中国仲裁法比较研究", 抚州师专学报, 1 (2003)
  46. 陸效龍, "關於涉外仲裁司法解释(徵求意见稿)的若干問題. in: 涉外仲裁司法審査" (2006), 法律出版社
  47. 尹忠顯, "從司法與仲裁關係的發展趣勢看我國仲裁法改革", 政法論叢, 1 (2006)
  48. 林一飛, "中國國際商事仲裁裁決的執行" (2006), 對外經濟貿易大學出版社
  49. 張麗霞, "論我國商事仲裁的司法監督" (2004), 對外經濟貿易大學
  50. 張 琳, "論國際商事仲裁中的司法監督", 行政與法, 12 (2005)
  51. 張斌生, "仲裁法新论" (2004), 廈門大學出版社
  52. 張 雪, "論我國國際商事仲裁裁決司法追訴的內部報告制度", 山東審判, 5 (2005)
  53. 趙秀文, "國際商事仲裁法" (2004), 中國人民大學出版社
  54. 周成新, "對涉外仲裁司法解释(征求意见稿)的修改意見. in: 涉外仲裁司法審査" (2006), 法律出版社
  55. 何其生, "中國國際私法學會二十年回顧", 武大國際法評論, 2 (2008)
  56. 韓 健, "現代國際商事仲裁的理論與實踐" (2000), 法律出版社
  57. 黃 瑞, "我國涉外仲裁司法監督制度的缺陷及其完善", 南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版), 38(2) (2007)
  58. Andreas Bucher, "Court Intervention in Arbitration. in: International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Towards Judicialization and Uniformity?" (1994), Transnational Publishers
  59. Andrew Tweeddale, "Arbitration of Commercial Disputes" (2007), Oxford University Press
  60. Jian Zhou, "Review and Perspective-China International Commercial Arbitration at the Advent of New Century", Arbitration and Law, 72(1) (2001)
  61. Julian D.M., "Comparative International Commercial Arbitration" (2003), Kluwer Law International
  62. Increasing Favorable Conditions for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitration Agreemnets - The Example of the People's Republic of China, Meijo University Institute for Socioeconomic Dispute Studies Project–Final Report, "Wang Sheng Chang", ~ (2004)
  63. Wang Sheng Chang, "CIETAC’s Perspective on Arbitration and Conciliation Concerning China", New Horizons in International Commercial Arbitration and Beyond-ICCA International Arbitration Congress (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)