从二元到一元:对商事仲裁裁决的司法监督
From Binary to Unitary: Improvement for Judicial Supervision in Commercial Arbitration
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
商事仲裁是纠纷解决机制的重要组成部分,商事仲裁的司法监督是商事仲裁制度公正的必要保障。司法监督的科学、合理,是提升商事仲裁解决纠纷能力的关键。我国现行的商事仲裁司法监督制度的法律依据是《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》,但两者规定出现二元双重,且模式不一,影响了司法监督作用的有效发挥,应当对商事仲裁裁决的司法监督进行必要完善,构筑一元化监督体制,主要是建构不区分国内仲裁与涉外仲裁的司法监督模式,着重进行程序性事项的监督,完善“裁定不予执行”的监督方式。
Abstract
Commercial arbitration is an essential part of dispute settlement process. Judicial supervision in commercial arbitration functions to ensure the impartiality during the process. A structured and proper judicial supervision system is deemed to be a core component to improve the level of arbitration’s effectiveness in settling disputes. However, the current supervision system is conducted under both Civil Procedure Law and Arbitration Law whereby the legislations/regulations are different and not unified. This issue has influenced the effectiveness of supervision. Therefore, the judicial supervision system in commercial arbitration needs to be improved to ensure the system is regulated under a unified environment, especially for judicial supervision in domestic and international arbitration. Further, a supervision system can be established focusing on monitoring procedure process and avoid “In‐execution of Judgment”.
참고문헌 (9)
- 罗楚湘, "仲裁的司法监督:过度干预和控制还是适度监督", 武汉大学学报(社会科学版), 2 (2005)
- 张斌生, "仲裁法新论" (2008), 厦门大学出版社
- 陈安, "中国涉外仲裁监督机制评析", 中国社会科学, 4 (1995)
- 周江, "商事仲裁司法监督模式的理论反思", 北京仲裁, 4 (2006)
- 李露霞, "浅析我国仲裁司法监督的范围", 行政与法, 11 (2014)
- 马建文, "论国内仲裁的司法监督与支持", 社科纵横, 4 (2006)
- 李建忠, "如何审理撤销仲裁裁决案", 人民法院报 (2001)
- 汪祖兴, "中国仲裁制度的境遇及改革要略" (2010), 法律出版社
- 乔欣, "仲裁权论" (2009), 法律出版社
