The ICC Scrutiny Process and Enhanced Enforceability of Arbitral Awards
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ever since its introduction in the 1927 ICC Arbitration Rules, scrutiny of awards by the ICC Court has been a cornerstone feature of ICC arbitration. Most players involved in the arbitral process are likely to concede that a certain level of review of arbitral awards is both desirable and beneficial. Indeed, proponents among the users are frequently influenced in their choice of the ICC as the administering arbitral institution, based on their strong conviction that time and money invested in the resolution of a dispute is ultimately only well spent if awards are voluntarily complied with or at least less susceptible to be set aside. By providing a look behind the scenes of the scrutiny process, the article does away with tales of excessive intervention on behalf of the arbitral institution when reviewing and approving awards and demystifies the role played by the ICC Court throughout its close interaction with arbitral tribunals operating under the ICC Rules. The article further argues that the scrutiny process can be a highly efficient tool that helps to increase the quality and enforceability of awards rendered under the aegis of the ICC
Abstract
Ever since its introduction in the 1927 ICC Arbitration Rules, scrutiny of awards by the ICC Court has been a cornerstone feature of ICC arbitration. Most players involved in the arbitral process are likely to concede that a certain level of review of arbitral awards is both desirable and beneficial. Indeed, proponents among the users are frequently influenced in their choice of the ICC as the administering arbitral institution, based on their strong conviction that time and money invested in the resolution of a dispute is ultimately only well spent if awards are voluntarily complied with or at least less susceptible to be set aside. By providing a look behind the scenes of the scrutiny process, the article does away with tales of excessive intervention on behalf of the arbitral institution when reviewing and approving awards and demystifies the role played by the ICC Court throughout its close interaction with arbitral tribunals operating under the ICC Rules. The article further argues that the scrutiny process can be a highly efficient tool that helps to increase the quality and enforceability of awards rendered under the aegis of the ICC
참고문헌 (18)
- Alan Redfern, "Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Gary B. Born, "International Commercial Arbitration" (2014), Kluwer Law International
- Jacob Grierson, "Arbitrating under the 2012 ICC Rules" (2012), Kluwer Law International
- The Secretariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration, "Jason Fry", ICC Publication, ~, pp.No. 729E (2012)
- Jean-François Poudret, "Comparative Law of International Arbitration" (2007), Sweet & Maxwell
- Michael W. Bühler, "Handbook of ICC Arbitration" (2014), Sweet & Maxwell
- Yves Derains, "Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration" (2005), Kluwer Law International
- Gustav Flecke-Giammarco, "WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration and Commercial Arbitration", pp.389~420 (2013), Kluwer Law International
- Michael W. Bühler, "Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner", pp.179~190 (2005), ICC Publishing
- Robert H. Smit, "Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner", pp.845~870 (2005), ICC Publishing
- Simon Greenberg, "Arbitral Institutions Under Scrutiny: ASA Special Series No. 40", pp.89~108 (2013), Juris Net LLC
- David T. McGovern, "The ICC Arbitral Process – Part IV: The Award. Scrutiny of the Award by the ICC Court", ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, 5(1), pp.46~47 (1999)
- Eric A. Schwartz, "The ICC Arbitral Process – Part IV: The Costs of ICC Arbitration", ICC International Court Bulletin, 4(1), pp.8~23 (1993)
- Horacio Grigera Naón, "The Powers of the ICC International Court of Arbitration vis-à-vis Parties and Arbitrators", ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement: Arbitration in the Next Decade: Proceedings of the International Court of Arbitration's 75th Anniversary Conference, pp.55~71 (1999)
- Humphrey Lloyd, "Drafting Awards in ICC Arbitrations", ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, 16(2), pp.19~40 (2005)
- Jennifer Kirby, "Insigma Technology Co. Ltd. v. Alstom Technology Ltd.: SIAC Can Administer Cases Under The ICC Rules?!?", Arbitration International, 25(Issue 3), pp.319~328 (2009)
- Jennifer Kirby, "The ICC Court: A Behind-the-Scenes Look", ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, 16(2), pp.9~18 (2005)
- Anthony Cheah Nicholls, "ICC Hybrid Arbitrations Here to Stay: Singapore Courts’ Treatment of the ICC Rules Revisions in Articles 1(2) and 6(2)", Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 31(Issue 3,), pp.393~412 (2014)