본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

U.S. Courts’ Review of Article V(1)(b) under the New York Convention for the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

전정원
한국중재학회 (Korean Association Of Arbitration Studies(Kaas))|2014.09|중재연구 (JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES)|제24권 제3호|pp. 79-103|DOI 10.16998/jas.2014.24.3.79

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

New York ConventionInternational ArbitrationDue Process Rights
주제분류무역학

초록

In light of increasing international trade in recent years, international arbitration has been more widely used by international parties to resolve their conflicts. Thus, the need for reliable and effective enforcement of foreign arbitral awards has amplified. To facilitate the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, the New York Convention lists grounds for the refusal of recognition and enforcement in Article V. This paper examines prominent U.S. case law on Article V(1)(b), which is put in place to ensure that arbitration proceedings are conducted properly in accordance with due process requirements: proper notice to parties and an opportunity to a fundamentally fair hearing. This examination of case law conveys that U.S. courts refuse to enforce foreign arbitral awards pursuant to Article V(1)(b) only when due process rights of the party against whom the award is to be enforced are clearly violated by the arbitral tribunal. This paper also reveals that U.S. courts mainly defer to arbitral tribunals’ discretion, especially as to evidentiary matters. Therefore, it is predicted that U.S. courts will likely continue to narrowly construe the grounds in Article V to facilitate reliable and effective enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the U.S.

Abstract

In light of increasing international trade in recent years, international arbitration has been more widely used by international parties to resolve their conflicts. Thus, the need for reliable and effective enforcement of foreign arbitral awards has amplified. To facilitate the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, the New York Convention lists grounds for the refusal of recognition and enforcement in Article V. This paper examines prominent U.S. case law on Article V(1)(b), which is put in place to ensure that arbitration proceedings are conducted properly in accordance with due process requirements: proper notice to parties and an opportunity to a fundamentally fair hearing. This examination of case law conveys that U.S. courts refuse to enforce foreign arbitral awards pursuant to Article V(1)(b) only when due process rights of the party against whom the award is to be enforced are clearly violated by the arbitral tribunal. This paper also reveals that U.S. courts mainly defer to arbitral tribunals’ discretion, especially as to evidentiary matters. Therefore, it is predicted that U.S. courts will likely continue to narrowly construe the grounds in Article V to facilitate reliable and effective enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the U.S.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "9 U.S.C. § 207", ~
  2. "UNCITRAL 2012 Digest of Case Law on the Model Law", ~
  3. 하충룡, "뉴욕협약상 외국중재판정에 대한 미국법원의 해석", 중재연구, 16(2), pp.121~150 (2006), 한국중재학회
  4. 김진현, "미국의 중재판정 취소에 관한 연구: 판례법과 제정법의 조화를 중심으로", 중재연구, 22(2), pp.125~157 (2012), 한국중재학회[DOI]
  5. Blackaby, N., "Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration" (2009), Oxford University Press
  6. Carter, James H., "International Commercial Arbitration in New York" (2010), Oxford University Press, Inc
  7. Ferrito, Vince, "Enforceability of Foreign Arbitration Awards in the U.S.", Dispute Resolution Journal, 68(1) (2013)
  8. McIlwrath, Michael, "International Arbitration and Mediation: A Practical Guide" (2010), Kluwer Law International
  9. Confirmation of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, "Rosenhouse, Michael A.", A.L.R. Fed, 291~, pp.American Law Reports, 194 (2004)
  10. Rovine, Arthur W., "Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation" (2011), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  11. "The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards" (1958)
  12. "Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958)" (2014)[URL]
  13. "Tempo Shain Corp. v. Bertek, Inc., 120 F.3d 16, 19 (2d Cir. 1997)", ~ (1997)
  14. "Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable Trust, 878 F. Supp. 2d 459 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)", ~ (2012)
  15. "Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable Trust, 729 F.3d 99, 103 (2d Cir. 2013)", ~ (2013)
  16. "First State Ins. Co. v. Banco De Seguros Del Estado, 254 F.3d 354 (1st Cir. 2001)", ~ (2001)
  17. "Geotech Lizenz AG v. Evergreen Sys., Inc., 697 F. Supp. 1248 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)", ~ (1988)
  18. "Sesostris, S.A.E. v. Transportes Navales, S.A., 727 F. Supp. 737 (D. Mass. 1989)", ~ (1989)
  19. "Yukos Capital, S.A.R.L. v. OAO Samaraneftegaz, 963 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)", ~ (2013)
  20. "Sea Hope Navigation Inc. v. Novel Commodities SA, 978 F. Supp. 2d 333 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)", ~ (2013)
  21. "Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333, 96 S. Ct. 893, 902, 47 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1976)", ~ (1976)
  22. "Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552, 85 S. Ct. 1187, 1191, 14 L. Ed. 2d 62 (1965)", ~ (1965)
  23. "Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co., Inc. v. Societe Generale de L’Industrie due Papier (RAKTA), 508 F.2d 969, 975-76 (2d Cir. 1974)", ~ (1974)
  24. "Slaney v. The Int’l Amateur Athletic Fed’n, 244 F.3d 580, 592 (7th Cir. 2001)", ~ (2001)
  25. "China Nat. Bldg. Material Inv. Co., Ltd. v. BNK Intern, LLC, No. A-09-CA-488-SS (W.D.Tex. Dec. 4, 2009)", ~ (2009)
  26. "Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, 350 U.S. 198, 203-04, 76 S. Ct. 273, 276-77, 100 L. Ed. 199 (1956)", ~ (1956)
  27. "Hoteles Condado Beach v. Union De Tronquistas, 763 F.2d 34, 40 (1st Cir. 1985)", ~ (1985)
  28. "Dean v. Sullivan, 118 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 1997)", ~ (1997)
  29. "Iran Aircraft Industries & Iran Helicopter Support and Renewal Co. v. Avco Corp., 980 F.2d 141 (2d Cir. 1992)", ~ (1992)
  30. "Avco Corp. v. Iran Aircraft Indus., Case No. 261, 19 Iran-U.S.Cl.Trib.Rep. 200, (1988)", ~ (1988)
  31. "Overseas Cosmos, Inc. v. NR Vessel Corp., No. 97 Civ. 5898 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 1997)", ~ (1997)
  32. "Generica Ltd. v. Pharm. Basics, Inc., 125 F.3d 1123 (7th Cir. 1997)", ~ (1997)
  33. "Supreme Oil Co., Inc. v. Abondolo, 568 F. Supp. 2d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)", ~ (2008)
  34. "Abu Dhabi Inv. Auth. v. Citigroup, Inc., No. 12 Civ. 283 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2013)", ~ (2013)
  35. "Bell Aerospace Co. Div. of Textron v. Local 516, 500 F.2d 921, 923 (2d Cir. 1974)", ~ (1974)

관련 논문AI추천

Summary Disposition Procedures in International Arbitration전정원법학연구원 · 법학논총2017 · 제37권 Analysis, Recognition and Enforcement Procedures of Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States김용길, 장병윤, David L. Welch한국중재학회 · 중재연구2017 · 제27권 제3호Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards by Arbitration Institutions in International Arbitration: Focusing on the ICC’s Scrutiny of Award Process전정원법과정책연구원 · 법과정책2017 · 제23권 제2호The Finality of Arbitral Awards: The U.S. Practices하충룡한국중재학회 · 중재연구2020 · 제30권 제3호Adverse Inferences as Sanctions in International Arbitration전정원한국중재학회 · 중재연구2023 · 제33권 제3호Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Incompatible with the Korean Procedural Framework임수현한국중재학회 · 중재연구2020 · 제30권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Case of Multiple ContractsAngélica Marcano, James Otis Rodnerpp. 1-31Amiable Composition in International ArbitrationAhmet Cemil Yildirimpp. 33-46The ICC Scrutiny Process and Enhanced Enforceability of Arbitral AwardsGustav Flecke-Giammarcopp. 47-77Arbitrating IP Disputes: the 2014 WIPO Arbitration RulesChristopher Boog, James Menzpp. 105-124Revising the Korean Arbitration Act From a Civil Law Jurisdiction Perspective: The Example of the French Arbitration ReformJalal El Ahdabpp. 125-169
원문 보기