The Integrity of Finality of International Arbitral Awards: International Commercial and ICSID Arbitration Awards
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Efficiency in the arbitration proceedings and finality of arbitral awards have been key attractive features of arbitration. While finality of awards is due to the fact that there is no appeals mechanism in arbitration, other recourses that are available against arbitral awards threaten the integrity of finality of arbitral awards. This article examines some of these recourses, such as, setting aside of arbitral awards pursuant to the UNCITRAL Model Law, scrutiny of draft awards by arbitration institutions, and annulment proceedings of ICSID Convention awards and discusses the implications of these measures in relation to assuring finality of arbitral awards in international commercial and investment arbitration cases. In order to more effectively respect the disputing parties’ autonomy in choosing arbitration, and also to give as much deference to arbitral tribunals’ decisions and their discretion in reaching their decisions, it is proposed that an official appellate mechanism would be preferred over the undermining of finality of arbitral awards that have been taking place through the currently available exclusive recourses against arbitral awards.
Abstract
Efficiency in the arbitration proceedings and finality of arbitral awards have been key attractive features of arbitration. While finality of awards is due to the fact that there is no appeals mechanism in arbitration, other recourses that are available against arbitral awards threaten the integrity of finality of arbitral awards. This article examines some of these recourses, such as, setting aside of arbitral awards pursuant to the UNCITRAL Model Law, scrutiny of draft awards by arbitration institutions, and annulment proceedings of ICSID Convention awards and discusses the implications of these measures in relation to assuring finality of arbitral awards in international commercial and investment arbitration cases. In order to more effectively respect the disputing parties’ autonomy in choosing arbitration, and also to give as much deference to arbitral tribunals’ decisions and their discretion in reaching their decisions, it is proposed that an official appellate mechanism would be preferred over the undermining of finality of arbitral awards that have been taking place through the currently available exclusive recourses against arbitral awards.
참고문헌 (33)
- "The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", ~ (1958)
- "The ICSID Convention", ~
- "UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration", ~
- UNCITRAL, "Digest of Case Law on International Commercial Arbitration", ~ (2012)
- "ICC Arbitration Rules", ~ (2017)
- "CIETAC Arbitration Rules", ~ (2015)
- "Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre", ~ (2016)
- "ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings", ~
- "Updated Background Paper on Annulment for the Administrative Council of ICSID", ~ (2016)
- International Arbitration Survey: Choices in International Arbitration, by the School of International Arbitration at Queen Mary University of London, , ~ (2010)
- "The Secretariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration, ICC Publication No. 729E", 327~ (2012)
- Gustav Flecke-Giammarco, "The ICC Scrutiny Process and Enhanced Enforceability of Arbitral Awards", 중재연구, 24(3), pp.47~77 (2014), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- Hi-Taek Shin, "Annulment, Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID", pp.699~ (2016), Wolters Kluwer
- Irene M. Ten Cate, "International Arbitration and the Ends of Appellate Review", Journal of International Law and Politics, 44, pp.1109~ (2012)
- Paul Friedland, "Rabid Redux: The Second Wave of Abusive ICSID Annulments", American University International Law Review, 27 (2012)
- Simon Greenberg, "International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia-Pacific Perspective" (2011), Cambridge Univ. Press
- "Wena Hotels Limited v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB", 98, Kerameus, Bucher, Orrego Vicuna, pp.2002, ~
- "CDC Group plc v. Republic of the Seychelles, ICSID Case No. ARB", 02, pp.2005, ~
- "Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB", 03, pp.2010, ~
- Ioan Micula, "Viorel Micula and others v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB", 05, pp.2016, ~
- "Patrick Mitchell v. Democratic Republic of the Congo, ICSID Case No. ARB", 99, 02, pp.7, Decision on Annulment[DOI]
- Sucharitkul, "Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. Republic of Guinea, ICSID Case No. ARB", 84, pp.1989, ~
- "El Paso Energy International Company v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB", 03, pp.2014, ~
- "Malicorp Ltd. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB", 8, pp.2013, ~
- "Amco Asia Corp. and others v. Republic of Indonesia (Amco II), ICSID Case No. ARB", 81, pp.1992, ~
- "Daimler Financial Services A.G. v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB", 05, pp.2015, ~
- "Consortium R.F.C.C. v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB", 00, pp.2006, ~
- Lalive, El-Kosheri, "Klöckner Industrie-Anlagen GmbH et al. v. United Republic of Cameroon and Societe Camerounaise des Engrais, ICSID Case No. ARB", 81, pp.1985, ~
- Kerameus, Bucher, "Wena Hotels Limited v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB", 98, pp.2002, ~
- Yusuf, "Tidewater Investment SRL and Tidewater Caribe, C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB", 10, pp.2015, ~
- "MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Republic of Chile, ISCID Case No. ARB", 01, pp.2007, ~
- "ICSID website under Database of ICSID Member States", ~
- "ICSID website under Process Overview", ~