본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The French approach to enforcement of arbitral awards, international public policy and corruption

Samantha Nataf
한국중재학회 (Korean Association Of Arbitration Studies(Kaas))|2023.09|중재연구 (JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES)|제33권 제3호|pp. 31-68

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

FranceCorruptionEnforcementInternational Public PolicyRed Flags
주제분류무역학

초록

In recent years, French courts have decided to adopt an uncompromising stance in the fight against corruption in international arbitration. While French enforcement/annulment courts were originally conducting a limited review of arbitral awards dealing with corruption allegations on international public policy grounds, they now carry a full re-examination of such awards accepting that a corruption plea be raised for the first time before them and admitting new evidence. What is at stake, in terms of international public policy, is to define the happy medium between, on the one hand, the necessity to preserve the enforceability of international arbitral awards, and, the necessity to fight corruption. This paper presents the evolution of French case law in the past years and makes a critical assessment of the French approach by comparison with other jurisdictions.

Abstract

In recent years, French courts have decided to adopt an uncompromising stance in the fight against corruption in international arbitration. While French enforcement/annulment courts were originally conducting a limited review of arbitral awards dealing with corruption allegations on international public policy grounds, they now carry a full re-examination of such awards accepting that a corruption plea be raised for the first time before them and admitting new evidence. What is at stake, in terms of international public policy, is to define the happy medium between, on the one hand, the necessity to preserve the enforceability of international arbitral awards, and, the necessity to fight corruption. This paper presents the evolution of French case law in the past years and makes a critical assessment of the French approach by comparison with other jurisdictions.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. S. Arvmyren, "Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook 2022, Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook Series, Volume 4", pp.231~256 (2022)
  2. L. d’Avout, "Droit du commerce international août 2016-juill", Recueil Dalloz, 2054~ (2017)
  3. S. Besson, "Le contrôle des sentences arbitrales par le juge suisse : aperçu de quelques traits caractéristiques et confrontation avec le droit français", Revue de l'Arbitrage, 2022(3), pp.867~898 (2022)
  4. S. Bollée, "note sous Paris, 16 janv. 2018", JDI, ~ (2018)
  5. V. Chantebout, "Étendue du contrôle du juge sur les violations de l’ordre public par l’arbitre : enfin le revirement espéré", Dalloz Actualité, ~ (2022)
  6. T. Clay, "Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges", Recueil Dalloz, 2541~ (2014)
  7. W. J.L. de Clerck, "Dutch Supreme Court Finds for the First Time on Corruption and Arbitration in Context of Annulment Proceedings", Journal of International Arbitration, 39(6), pp.881~904 (2022), Kluwer Law International
  8. L.-C. Delanoy, "L'arrêt M. Schneider du 12 février 2014 : feu rouge pour la « révision », feu vert pour la corruption ?", Cahiers de l’arbitrage, (3), pp.585~ (2014)[DOI]
  9. I. Fadlallah, "L'ordre public dans les sentences arbitrales", Collected courses of the Hague Academy of International law, 249, pp.369~430 (1994)
  10. I. Fadlallah, "La corruption corrompt l’arbitrage, note sous Paris, 5 avril 2022", Revue de l’arbitrage, 2022(2), pp.640~646 (2022)
  11. I. Fadlallah, "Note under Cour d’appel de Versailles, 14 March 2023, Société Alstom Transport et autre c", société Alexander Brothers Ltd, 2023, pp.2023(2), 416~422
  12. J. Risse, "Fighting International Corruption in Domestic Courts – Alstom, Sorelec and the Review of Arbitral Awards", SchiedsVZ | German Arbitration Journal, 21(2), pp.91~98 (2023), Kluwer Law International
  13. E. Gaillard, "Le nouveau droit français de l’arbitrage interne et international", Recueil Dalloz, ~ (2011)
  14. E. Gaillard, "L’apport de la pensée juridique française à l’arbitrage internationale", JDI, (2) (2017)
  15. E. Gaillard, "note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 13 Sept. 2017", JDI, ~ (2017)
  16. E. Gaillard, "note sous Paris, 16 janv. 2018", JDI, ~ (2018)
  17. C. Greenberg, "Le contrôle de la conformité de la sentence à l'ordre public international : les questions en suspens", Revue de l'Arbitrage, 2022(1), pp.227~250 (2022)
  18. A.-C. Hahn, "Arbitration and Corruption, ASA Special Series, Volume 47", pp.71~80
  19. R. Hansen, "A contribution by the ITA Board of Reporters", Kluwer Law International
  20. C. Jarrosson, "La jurisprudence Belokon-Sorelec, ou l’avènement d’un contrôle illimitédes sentences", Revue de l'Arbitrage, 2022(4), pp.1251~1286 (2022)
  21. J. Jourdan-Marques, "Chronique d’arbitrage : la Cour de cassation crève l’abcès sur l’ordre public international", Dalloz Actualité, ~ (2022)
  22. A-M. Lacoste, "Corruption as a Bar to Award Enforcement in France", ASA Bulletin, 36(1), pp.31~52 (2018), Kluwer Law International
  23. P. Mayer, "Corruption : nouvelles orientations dans le contrôle de la conformité de la sentence à l'ordre public international, note sous Paris, 27 octobre 2020, Paris, 17novembre 2020, Paris, 25 mai 2021", Revue de l'Arbitrage, 2021(3), pp.788~799 (2021)
  24. J.B. Racine, "Le contrôle de la conformité de la sentence à l’ordre public international un état des lieux", Revue de l’arbitrage, (1), pp.179~226 (2022)[DOI]
  25. C. Seraglini, "Le contrôle par le juge de l’absence de contrariété de la sentence àl’ordre public international : le passé, le présent, le futur", Revue de l’arbitrage, 2020(2), pp.347~376 (2020)
  26. United Nations, "Global Cost of Corruption at Least 5 Pert Cent of World Gross Domestic Product, Secretary-General Tells in Security Council, Citing World Economic Forum Data, SC.13493", ~ (2018)
  27. Sustainable Development Goals Report, "United Nations", ~ (2022)
  28. "Cour de Cassation, 9 May 1900, Prince De Wrède v. Dame Maldaner", ~
  29. "Cour de cassation, Civ. 1ère, 7 January 1964, Munzer, JDI, 1964.302, note B. Goldman", ~ (1964)
  30. "Cour de cassation, Civ. 1ère, 20 February 2007, N° 05-14.082, Cornelissen, D. 2007. 1115, note L. d’Avout and S. Bollée; Rev. crit. DIP 2007. 420, note B. Ancel and H. Muir Watt; JDI n°4 2007.1195, comm. 19, note F.-X. Train", ~ (2007)
  31. "Cour de Cassation, Civ. 1ère, 12 February 2014, N° 10-17.076, M. Schneider Schaltgerätebau und Elektroinstallationen GmbH v. Société CPL Industries Limited, Rev. arb., 2014.389, note D. Vidal; Cah. arb., 2014.585, note L.-C. Delanoy; D., 2014.1967, obs. S. Bollée; D. Actualité, 19 February 2014, obs. X. Delpech; JCPG, 2014.474, note P. Chevalier; JCP G, 2014.475, note D. Mouralis; Procédures n°4, April 2014, comm. 107, note L. Weiller; Gaz. Pal., 28 June 2014, p. 15, obs. D. Bensaude", ~ (2014)
  32. "Cour de Cassation, Civ. 1ère, 29 September 2021, N° 19-19.769, Société Alexander Brothers Ltd v. Société Alstom Transport SA and Société Alstom Network UK Ltd, Rev. arb., 2021.687, note Ch. Jarrosson; D. Actualité, 19 November 2021, obs. J. Jourdan-Marques", ~ (2021)
  33. "Cour de Cassation, Civ. 1ère, 23 March 2022, N° 17-17.981, M. Belokon v. République du Kirghizistan, Rev. arb., 2022.945, note S. Bollée and M. Audit; JCP G., 2022.676, note B. Remy, JCP G., 2022, Doctr. 724, obs. Ch. Seraglini; D. Actualité, 10 May 2022, obs. V. Chantebout; RTD civ., 2022.701, obs. P. Théry; Gaz. Pal., 2022, n°15, p. 11, obs. L. Larribère; Procédures n°7, 2022, comm. 173, obs. L. Weiller; JCPE, 2023.1067, obs. D. Mainguy; JDI n°2, April 2022, chron. 4, K. Mehtiyeva; JDI, 2023, comm.3, note E.Loquin", ~ (2023)
  34. "Cour de Cassation, Civ. 1ère, 7 September 2022, N° 20-22.118, SA Société orléanaise d'électricité et de chauffage électrique Sorelec v. Etat de Libye, D., 2022.1773, obs. S. Bollée; D. Actualité, 28 October 2022, obs. J. Jourdan-Marques", ~ (2022)
  35. "Paris Court of Appeal, 18 November 2004, N° 2002", 19606, S.A. Thalès Air Défense v. G.I.E. Euromissile, Rev. crit. DIP, 2006.104, note S. Bollée; JDI, 2005.357, note A. Mourre; RTD com., 2005.263, obs. E. Loquin; Rev. arb., 2005.529, note L. Radicati di Brozolo; D., 2005.3050, obs. T. Clay; JCP 2005, II, 10038, note G. Chabot; JCP 2005, I, 134, obs. Ch. Seraglini, 2006
  36. "Paris Court of Appeal, 10 September 2009, N° 08", 11757, Société M Schneider Schaltgerätebau und Elektroinstallationen GmbH v. Société CPL Industries Limited, D., 2010. 2933, obs. T. Clay; Rev. arb., 2010. 548, note L.-C. Delanoy, 2010
  37. "Paris Court of Appeal, 4 March 2014, N° 12", 17681, Société Gulf Leaders for Management and Services Holding Company v. SA Crédit Foncier de France, D., 2014.1967, obs. S. Bollée; D., 2014.2541, obs. Th. Clay; Rev. arb., 2014.955, obs. L. C. Delanoy; Gaz. Pal., 28 June 2014, p. 16, obs. D. Bensaude, 2014
  38. "Paris Court of Appeal, 14 October 2014, N° 13", 03410, République du Congo v. SA Commissions import export, Rev. Arb., 2014.1030; D., 2014.2541, obs. Th. Clay, 2014
  39. "Paris Court of Appeal, 4 November 2014, N° 13", 10256, SAS Man Diesel & Turbo France v. Société Al Maimana General Trading Company Ltd, RTD com., 2015.67, obs. E. Loquin; Rev. arb., 2015.543, note A. de Fontmichel, 2015
  40. "Paris Court of Appeal, 27 September 2016, N° 15", 12614, SA Ancienne Maison Marcel Bauche v. Société Indagro, Rev. arb. 2017.942; JDI n°4, 2017, 20, note E. Gaillard; JCP G, 2017.1326, n° 5, obs. Ch. Seraglini; RTD com. 2020. 283, obs. E. Loquin, 2017
  41. "Paris Court of Appeal, 21 February 2017, N° 15", 01650, République du Kirghizistan v. M. Belokon, Rev. arb., 2017.915, note S. Bollée and M. Audit; JDI n°4, 2017, 20 (3e esp.), note E. Gaillard; D., 2017.2054, obs. S. Bollée; D., 2017.2559, obs. Th. Clay; RTD com., 2019.42, obs. E. Loquin; RTD com., 2020.283, obs. E. Loquin; JCP G. n°50, 2017, doctr. 1326, obs. Ch. Seraglini, ASA Bull., 2017.551, note L.-C. Delanoy, 2017
  42. "Paris Court of Appeal, 16 May 2017, N° 15", 17442, République démocratique du Congo v. Custom and Tax Consultancy LLC, Rev. arb., 2018.248, note J.-B. Racine, 2018
  43. "Paris Court of Appeal, 16 January 2018, Société MK Group v. SARL Onix et autres, Rev. arb., 2018.401, note S. Lemaire; JDI, July 2018, comm. 12, p. 883, note S. Bollée; JDI, July 2018, comm. 13, p. 898, note E. Gaillard; D., 2018.1635, note M. Audit; D., 2018.1934, obs. L. d'Avout; D., 2018 2448, obs. Th. Clay", ~ (2018)
  44. "Paris Court of Appeal, 10 April 2018, N° 16", 11182, Société Alstom Transport SA and Société Alstom Network UK Ltd v. Société Alexander Brothers Ltd, D. 2018. 1934, obs. L. d’Avout; RTD com., 2019.42, obs. E. Loquin; RTD com. 2020. 283, obs. E. Loquin; Rev. arb. 2018. 574, note E. Gaillard; Cah. arb. 2018. 465, note A. Pinna; JDI n°2, April 2019, chron. 4, K. Mehtiyeva, 2019
  45. "Paris Court of Appeal, 28 May 2019, N°16", 11182, Société Alstom Transport SA and Société Alstom Network UK Ltd v. Société Alexander Brothers Ltd, Rev. arb., 2019.850, note E. Gaillard; Cah. arb., 2020, note L-C. Delanoy and R. Dethomas; JDI n°2, April 2020, 10, comm. E. Loquin; Gaz. Pal., 2 July 2019, p.22, obs. D. Bensaude, 2020
  46. "Paris Court of Appeal, 27 October 2020, N° 19", 04177, République du Bénin v. Société Securiport Bénin et Société Securiport LLC, Rev. arb., 2021.748, note P. Mayer, 2021
  47. "Paris Court of Appeal, 17 November 2020, N° 18", 02568, Etat de Libye v. SA Société orléanaise d'électricité et de chauffage électrique Sorelec, Rev. arb., 2021.762, note P. Mayer, 2021
  48. "Paris Court of Appeal, 25 May 2021, N° 18", 18708, République Gabonaise and Commune de X v. Webcor ITP Ltd. et autre, Rev. arb., 2021.778, note P. Mayer; Gaz. Pal., 13 July 2021, p. 24, obs. D. Bensaude; JDI, 2022, comm. 11, note S. Manciaux, 2022
  49. "Paris Court of Appeal, 25 May 2021, N° 18", 27648, Etat de Libye v. Cengiz İnsaat Sanayive Ticaret A.S, Rev. arb., 2021.1154, note G. Bertrou, H. Piguet and D. Bayandin; D. Actualité, 18 June 2021, obs. J. Jourdan Marques; JDI, 2022. Comm. 4, note S. Manciaux, 2022
  50. "Paris Court of Appeal, 7 September 2021, N° 19", 17531, République de Guinée and Autorité de régulation des postes et des télécommunications de la Guinée v. Société Global Voice Groupe S.A., Rev. arb., 2021.974; D. Actualité, 19 November 2021, obs. J. Jourdan-Marques, 2021
  51. "Paris Court of Appeal, 5 April 2022, N°20", 03242, République Gabonaise v. Société Groupement Santullo Sericom Gabon, Rev. arb., 2022.620, note I. Fadlallah; JDI n°2, April 2022, chron. 4, K. Mehtiyeva; D. Actualité, 20 May 2022, J. Jourdan-Marques, 2022
  52. "Versailles Court of Appeal, 14 March 2023, N° 21", 06191, Société Alstom Transport SA and Société Alstom Network UK Ltd v. Société Alexander Brothers Ltd, Rev. Arb., 2023.371, note I. Fadlallah; D. Actualité, 30 May 2023, obs. J. Jourdan-Marques;JDI, n°3, July-August-September 2023, chron.5, note K.Mehtiyeva, 2023
  53. "Judgment of the Swiss Federal Tribunal, 3 November 2016, 4A_136", 2016, 2016
  54. EWHC 1584, , 2020
  55. S. W. Schill, "ICCA Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 2021 – Volume XLVI, Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, Volume 46" (2021)
  56. "Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1520", ~
  57. "ICC Guidelines on Agents, Intermediaries and Other Third Parties", ~ (2010)
  58. "New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958, Article V(2)(b)", ~ (1958)
  59. "United Nations Convention against Corruption (adopted on 31 October 2003, entered into force on 14 December 2005", ~ (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

ILLEGALITY IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATIONLeng Sun Chan한국중재학회 · 중재연구2025 · 제35권 제3호Public Policy under the Russian Arbitration박은옥, Andreevskikh Liliia한국중재학회 · 중재연구2022 · 제32권 제3호The ICC Scrutiny Process and Enhanced Enforceability of Arbitral AwardsGustav Flecke-Giammarco한국중재학회 · 중재연구2014 · 제24권 제3호Revising the Korean Arbitration Act From a Civil Law Jurisdiction Perspective: The Example of the French Arbitration ReformJalal El Ahdab한국중재학회 · 중재연구2014 · 제24권 제3호The Principle of Confidentiality in Arbitration: A Necessary CrisisBernardo M. Cremades, Rodrigo Cortés한국중재학회 · 중재연구2013 · 제23권 제3호국제중재판정의 집행을 거부하기 위한 사유로서의 공서박영길한국중재학회 · 중재연구2002 · 제12권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

Recent Debates in Attorney-Client related Privilege and Confidentiality in Korea and Its Implications to International Arbitration김준기pp. 3-30ENFORCING RIGHTS OVER DIGITAL ASSETSChan Leng Sunpp. 69-93Third-Party Funding as a Panacea for an Amicable Adjudication of International Arbitration Disputes in Nigeria under the Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023Clement Ighodargho OSUYApp. 95-106Adverse Inferences as Sanctions in International Arbitration전정원pp. 107-128Arbitrator’s Reputation and PR Cost: A Signaling Approach김성룡, 권준엽pp. 129-146
원문 보기