다수당사자중재에 있어서 중재인 선정방법
The Method of appointing arbitrators in Multi-Party Arbitration
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When several parties are involved in a dispute, it is usually considered desirable that the issues should be dealt with in the same proceedings, rather than in a series of separate proceedings. This saves time and money. It avoids the possibility of conflicting decisions on the same issues of law and fact, since all issues are determined by the same tribunal at the same time. Where there is a multi-party arbitration, it may be because there are several parties to one contract, or it may be because there are several contracts with different parties that have a bearing on the matters in dispute. In international trade and commerce, for individuals, corporations or state agencies to join together in a joint venture or consortium or in some other legal relationship of this kind, in order to enter into a contract with another party or parties, where such a contract contains an arbitration clause and a dispute arises, the members of the consortium or joint venture may decided that they would each like to appoint an arbitrator. A different problem arises where there are several contracts with different parties, each of which has a bearing on the issues in dispute. A major international construction project is likely to involve not only the employer and the main contractor, but also a host of special suppliers and sub-contractors. Each of them will be operating under different contracts often with different choice of law and arbitration clauses. The appointment of the arbitrator or the composition of the arbitral tribunal should be in accordance with the agreement of the parties. The parties have to be equally treated in the constituting of the arbitral tribunal and the arbitral proceedings. However, the right of the parties to nominate a member of the arbitral tribunal could be taken away from them, if they are subject to the restrictions by means of the law of the country where the arbitration is taking place. That is, multiple parties jointly should nominate one arbitrator, where there they have to exercise their substantive right in common, or one of them exert his substantive right, then it has an effect on another parties, or they, whether as claimant or as respondent, get the same or similar treatment in the arbitral procedure. Therefore it is necessary to intend to settle multi-party disputes quickly and efficiently.
Abstract
When several parties are involved in a dispute, it is usually considered desirable that the issues should be dealt with in the same proceedings, rather than in a series of separate proceedings. This saves time and money. It avoids the possibility of conflicting decisions on the same issues of law and fact, since all issues are determined by the same tribunal at the same time. Where there is a multi-party arbitration, it may be because there are several parties to one contract, or it may be because there are several contracts with different parties that have a bearing on the matters in dispute. In international trade and commerce, for individuals, corporations or state agencies to join together in a joint venture or consortium or in some other legal relationship of this kind, in order to enter into a contract with another party or parties, where such a contract contains an arbitration clause and a dispute arises, the members of the consortium or joint venture may decided that they would each like to appoint an arbitrator. A different problem arises where there are several contracts with different parties, each of which has a bearing on the issues in dispute. A major international construction project is likely to involve not only the employer and the main contractor, but also a host of special suppliers and sub-contractors. Each of them will be operating under different contracts often with different choice of law and arbitration clauses. The appointment of the arbitrator or the composition of the arbitral tribunal should be in accordance with the agreement of the parties. The parties have to be equally treated in the constituting of the arbitral tribunal and the arbitral proceedings. However, the right of the parties to nominate a member of the arbitral tribunal could be taken away from them, if they are subject to the restrictions by means of the law of the country where the arbitration is taking place. That is, multiple parties jointly should nominate one arbitrator, where there they have to exercise their substantive right in common, or one of them exert his substantive right, then it has an effect on another parties, or they, whether as claimant or as respondent, get the same or similar treatment in the arbitral procedure. Therefore it is necessary to intend to settle multi-party disputes quickly and efficiently.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김상원, "주석 신민사소송법(Ⅰ)", 한국사법행정학회 (2004)
- 大?一武, "國際商事仲裁における多數當事者間仲裁-最近事例をめぐって-(3·完)”", JCAジャナル, 42(1) (1995), 國際商事仲裁協會
- 大?一武, "仲裁の當事者", 國際商事法務, 21(1) (1993), 國際商事法硏究所
- 澤田壽夫, "多數當事者仲裁:付託事項書:仲裁人契約と責任:判斷の補正[國際商事仲裁の現在の諸問題", JCAジャナル, 43(3) (1996), 國際商事仲裁學會
- 中村英郞, "多數當事者關與の仲裁に關する諸問題-仲裁人の選定の問題を中心として-”, ギリシャの民事訴訟法學" (1999), 成文堂
- 谷口安平, "多數當事者間の國際商事仲裁(民事紛爭處理[民事手續法論集 第3卷)" (2000), 信山社
- "Franz Laschet, “Die Mehrparteienschiedsgerichtsbarkeit,” Festschrift f?r Arthur B?low zum 80. Geburtstag, C. Heymanns, 1981", ~ (1981)
- "G?nter Henn, “Die Unparteilichkeit des Schiedsrichteramts,” DIS", RSP 1993, 13, 1993
- "Heinz Thomas", Hans Putzo, Zivilproze?rdnung, C. H. Beck, 2005, 2005
- Iv?n Sz?sz, "Disputes in joint ventures and with subcontractors,” International Arbitration in Multi-Party Commercial Disputes" (1982), International Chamber of Commerce
- "Karl Heinz Schwab, Mehrparteienschiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Streitgenossenschaft, Festschrift f?r Walter J. Habscheid zum 65. Geburtstag, Gieseking, 1989", ~ (1989)
- "Karl Heinz Schwab, “Die Gleichheit der Parteien bei der Bildung des Schiedsgerichts,” DIS 1992, 17", ~
- Karl Heinz Schwab, "Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit" (2005), C. H. Beck
- Peter Schlosser, "Das Recht der internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit" (1989), J. C. B. Mohr
- Stellos Koussoulis, "Beit?ge zur modernen Rechtskraftlehre" (1986), C. Heymanns
- "Udo Kornmeier, “Schiedsf?higkeit und materielle Vergleichsbefugnis,” ZZP 94(1981), 27", ~ (1981)
- Walter J. Habscheid, "Zum Problem der Mehrparteienschiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Schweizer Beitr?ge zur internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit" (1984), Schulthess
- Wilhelm Kisch, "Beitr?ge zum Schiedsverfahren:Klagezur?cknahme, Klag?nderung, Widerklage, Klageverbindungen" (1933), J. Bensheimer
