본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국에서의 복수당사자 중재에 관하여

Multiparty Arbitration in the U.S.A

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Abstract

The majority of arbitrations are conducted by a individually single procedures which have two parties and are governed by one contract with one arbitration agreement between two parties. Recently, however, arbitrations involving multiparty disputes have been increased, which arise in the context of the more complex international transaction, insurance and construction, etc. Such disputes may concern more than one contractual agreement, and one or more of those agreements may not contain arbitration clauses. Under this circumstances, the issues are whether arbitration is enforceable when no all parties to the dispute are bound to arbitrate. A party's ability to arbitrate any disputes arises from its consent as a signatory to a contract between himself and other party which includes an arbitration clause. Non-signatory to a contract with arbitral agreement, therefore, should not be bound to arbitrate any disputes without his consent to do so. But a related party that has not signed an agreement to arbitrate may be compelled or permitted to participate in an arbitration when he is found in circumstances of piercing the corporate veil, principal-agent relationship, assumption of agreement to arbitrate, or estoppel. Civil Procedure Rules permits the consolidation of litigations, joinder of parties or claims into a single procedure, and the third party's intervention to it, where common issues of law and fact exit, for reasons of economy and consistency of the judgments. Similarly, in the arbitration procedure, arbitral tribunals or courts may permit or order consolidations, joinders, or interventions with all parties's consents. The U.S. class/classwide arbitration or an arbitral class action is a hybrid procedure of class action and mandatory binding arbitration, in which any dispute is required to be resolved through an arbitration by an agreement. While the AAA has the rules for this classwide arbitration, the Federal Arbitration Act or the Uniform Arbitration Act don't provide for it at all. For the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, courts' assistances will be necessary to determine class issues for class certification, notice, adequacy of class representation, and settlement, etc.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김상균, "미국 중재절차에서 집단분쟁의 해결", 비교사법, 15(4), pp.605~647 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
  2. 명순구, "미국계약법입문" (2008), 법문사
  3. 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구 제1권" (2007), 박영사
  4. 심 영, "미국에 있어서의 소송대체적 분쟁해결제도- 증권분쟁을 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 11(2), pp.531~565 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
  5. 양명조, "미국계약법" (1996), 법문사
  6. Alan S. Kaplinsky, "Arbitration And Class Actions: A Contradiction In Terms, Litigation and Administrative Practice Course Handbook Series", Practising Law Institute, ~ (2006)
  7. Bernard Hanotiau, "Complex Arbitrations", Kluwer Law International, ~ (2005)
  8. Carolyn B. Lamm, "Defining the Party ― Who is a Proper Party in an International Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association and Other International Institutions", Geo.Wash.Int'l L. Rev, 34, pp.712~ (2003)
  9. Edward Brunet, "Arbitration Law in America" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  10. Jack H. Friedenthal, "Civil Procedure", pp.2005, Thompson
  11. Jean R.Sternlight, "As Mandatory Binding Arbitration Meets The Class Action, Will The Class Action Survive?", William & Mary L. Rev, 42, pp.1~ (2000)
  12. Jean R. Sternlight, "Mandatory Arbitration: Using Arbitration to Eliminate Consumer Class Actions: Efficient Business Practice or Unconscionable Abuse?", Law & Comtemp. Prob., 67, pp.75~ (2004)
  13. Michael F. Hollering, "Consolidated Arbitration: Will It Result in Increased Efficiency or Am Affront to Party Autonomy?", Dispute Resolution Journal, ~ (1997)
  14. Richard L. Marcus, "Civil Procedure", pp.2005, Thomson
  15. Stelios Koussoulis, "Fragen zur Mehrparteienschiedsgerichsbarkeit, insbesondere zur Bestellung der Schiedsrichter", ZZP 109 Band, 2 Heft, ~ (1994)
  16. Note, "Classwide Arbitration: Efficient Adjudication or Procedural Quagmire?", Va. L. Rev, 67, pp.787~ (1981)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)